Regardless of culturing status, the Zetaproteobacteria show up worldwide in estuarine and marine habitats associated with opposing steep redox gradients of reduced (ferrous) iron and oxygen, either as a minor detectable component or as the dominant member of the microbial community. Zetaproteobacteria have been most commonly found at deep-sea hydrothermal vents, though recent discovery of members of this class in near-shore environments has led to the reevaluation of Zetaproteobacteria distribution and significance.
Microbial mats encrusted with iron oxide on the flank of Loihi Seamount, Hawaii. Microbial communities in this type of habitat can harbor microbial communities dominated by the iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria.
The Zetaproteobacteria are distributed worldwide in deep sea and near shore environments at oxic/anoxic interfaces. With this wide distribution, the Zetaproteobacteria have the potential to play a substantial role in biogeochemical cycling, both past and present. Ecologically, the Zetaproteobacteria play a major role in the engineering of their own environment through the use of the controlled deposition of mineralized iron oxides, also directly affecting the environment of other members of the microbial community.
Prevalence of the Zetaproteobacteria in near-shore metal (e.g. steel) coupon biocorrosion experiments highlights the impact of these marine iron oxidizers on expensive problems such as the rusting of ship hulls, metal pilings, and pipelines.
Mariprofundus ferrooxydans PV-1 twisted stalks TEM image. One example of Fe oxide morphotypes produced by the Zetaproteobacteria. Image by Clara Chan.
Subsequent isolation of two strains of M. ferrooxydans, PV-1 and JV-1, along with the increasing realization that a phylogenetically distinct group of Proteobacteria (the Zetaproteobacteria) could be found globally as dominant members of bacterial communities led to the suggestion for the creation of this new class of the Proteobacteria.
Neutrophilic microaerophilic Fe-oxidizing bacteria are typically cultivated using an agarose-stabilized or liquid culture with an FeS or FeCO3 plug. The headspace of the culture tube is then purged with air or a low concentration of oxygen (often 1% or less O2). Fe-oxidizers have also successfully been cultivated in liquid culture with FeCl2 as the Fe source. These cultivation techniques follow those found in Emerson and Floyd (2005).
Recently, researchers have been able to culture the Zetaproteobacteria using graphite electrodes at a fixed voltage. Researchers have also aimed to improve cultivation techniques using a high-biomass batch culturing technique.
One of the most distinctive ways of identifying circumneutral iron oxidizing bacteria visually is by identifying the structure of the mineralized iron oxyhydroxide product created during iron oxidation. Oxidized, or ferric iron is insoluble at circumneutral pH, thus the microbe must have a way of dealing with the mineralized "waste" product. It is thought that one method to accomplish this is to control the deposition of oxidized iron. Some of the most common morphotypes include: amorphous particulate oxides, twisted or helical stalks (figure), sheaths, and y-shaped irregular filaments.
These morphologies exist both in freshwater and marine iron habitats, though common freshwater iron-oxidizing bacteria such as Gallionella sp. (twisted stalk) and Leptothrix ochracea (sheath) have only extremely rarely been found in the deep sea (not significant abundance). One currently published morphotype that has been partially resolved is the twisted stalk, which is commonly formed by M. ferrooxydans. This bacteria is a gram negative kidney-bean-shaped cell that deposits iron oxides on the concave side of the cell, forming twisted stalks as it moves through its environment.
Iron oxidation morphotypes can be preserved and have been detected in ancient hydrothermal deposits preserved in the rock record. Some current work is focused on how the Zetaproteobacteria form their individual biominerals in the modern environment so that scientists can better interpret Fe biominerals found in the rock record.
Phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic placement of the Zetaproteobacteria (orange branches) within the Proteobacteria. Asterisks highlight the Zetaproteobacteria cultured isolates.
An operational taxonomic unit, or an OTU, allows a microbiologist to define a bacterial taxa using defined similarity bins based on a gene of interest. In microbial ecology, the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene is generally used at a cut off of 97% similarity to define an OTU. In the most basic sense, the OTU represents a bacterial species.
For the Zetaproteobacteria, 28 OTUs have been defined. Of interest were the two globally distributed OTUs that dominated the phylogenetic tree, two OTUs that seemed to originate in the deep subsurface, and several endemic OTUs, along with the relatively limited detection of the isolated Zetaproteobacteria representative.
Zetaproteobacteria OTUs can now be classified according to the naming scheme used in McAllister et al. (2011). The program ZetaHunter uses closed reference binning to identify sequences closely related to the established OTUs in addition to identifying novel Zetaproteobacteria OTUs. ZetaHunter's feature list continues to grow, but includes: 1) stable OTU binning, 2) sample comparison, 3) database and mask management options, 4) multi-threaded processing, 5) chimera checking, 6) checks for non-database-related sequences, and 7) OTU network maps. The ZetaHunter software can be downloaded at: [github.com]
All of the habitats where Zetaproteobacteria have been found have (at least) two things in common: 1) they all provide an interface of steep redox gradients of oxygen and iron. & 2) they are marine or brackish.
Reduced hydrothermal fluids, for instance, exiting from vents in the deep-sea carry with them high concentrations of ferrous iron and other reduced chemical species, creating a gradient upward through a microbial mat of high to low ferrous iron. Similarly, oxygen from the overlying seawater diffuses into the microbial mat resulting in a downward gradient of high to low oxygen. Zetaproteobacteria are thought to live at the interface, where there is enough oxygen for use as an electron acceptor without there being too much oxygen for the organism to compete with the increased rate of chemical oxidation, and where there is enough ferrous iron for growth.
Iron oxidation is not always energetically favorable. Reference discusses favorable conditions for iron oxidation in habitats that otherwise may have been thought to be dominated by the more energy yielding metabolisms of hydrogen or sulfur oxidation.
Note: Iron is not the only reduced chemical species accociated with these redox gradient environments. It is likely that Zetaproteobacteria are not all iron oxidizers.
Iron oxidation pathways in both acidophilic and circumneutral freshwater iron oxidation habitats, such as acid mine drainage or groundwater iron seeps, respectively, are better understood than marine circumneutral iron oxidation.
In recent years, researchers have made progress in suggesting possibilities for how the Zetaproteobacteria oxidize iron, primarily through comparative genomics. With this technique, genomes from organisms with similar function, for example the freshwater Fe-oxidizing Betaproteobacteria and the marine Fe-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria, are compared to find genes that may be required for this function. Identifying the iron oxidation pathway in the Zetaproteobacteria began with the publication of the first described cultured representative, M. ferrooxydans strain PV-1. In this genome, the gene neighborhood of a molybdopterin oxidoreductase protein was identified as a place to start looking at candidate iron oxidation pathway genes. In a follow up analysis of a metagenomic sample, Singer et al. (2013) concluded that this molybdopterin oxidoreductase gene cassette was likely involved in Fe oxidation. Comparative analysis of several single cell genomes, however, suggested an alternative conserved gene cassette with several cytochrome c and cytochrome oxidase genes to be involved in Fe oxidation. For further reading on Fe oxidation pathways see reference.
The phylogenetic distance between the Zetaproteobacteria and the Fe-oxidizing freshwater Betaproteobacteria suggests that Fe oxidation and the produced biominerals are the result of convergent evolution. Comparative genomics has been able to identify several genes that are shared between the two clades, however, suggesting that the trait of Fe oxidation could have been horizontally transferred, possibly virally-mediated.
Fe mats associated with the Zetaproteobacteria, in addition to oxidizing Fe have been found to have the genetic potential for denitrification, arsenic detoxification, Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle, and reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycles. Novel primers have been designed to detect these genes in environmental samples.
It is difficult at this point to speculate on the metabolism of the entire class of Zetaproteobacteria (with at least 28 different OTUs/species) with the limited sample size.
Emerson et al., 2010. Iron-oxidizing bacteria: an environmental and genomic perspective.
Hedrich et al., 2011. The iron-oxidizing proteobacteria.
Ilbert and Bonnefoy, 2013. Insights into the evolution of the iron oxidation pathways.
Kato, 2015. Ecophysiology of neutrophilic iron-oxidizing microorganisms and its significance in global biogeochemical cycling.
Ishibashi et al. eds, 2015. Subseafloor Biosphere Linked to Hydrothermal Systems.
Melton et al., 2014. The interplay of microbially-mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical Fe cycle.
^ abDavis, R. E.; Stakes, D. S.; Wheat, C. G.; Moyer, C. L. (2009). "Bacterial Variability within an Iron-Silica-Manganese-rich Hydrothermal Mound Located Off-axis at the Cleft Segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge". Geomicrobiology Journal. 26 (8): 570–580. doi:10.1080/01490450902889080.
^ abHandley, K. M.; Boothman, C.; Mills, R. A.; Pancost, R. D.; Lloyd, J. R. (2010). "Functional diversity of bacteria in a ferruginous hydrothermal sediment". The ISME Journal. 4 (9): 1193–1205. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.38. PMID20410934.
^ abcKato, S.; Yanagawa, K.; Sunamura, M.; Takano, Y.; Ishibashi, J. I.; Kakegawa, T.; Utsumi, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Toki, T.; Noguchi, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Moroi, A.; Kimura, H.; Kawarabayasi, Y.; Marumo, K.; Urabe, T.; Yamagishi, A. (2009). "Abundance of Zetaproteobacteria within crustal fluids in back-arc hydrothermal fields of the Southern Mariana Trough". Environmental Microbiology. 11 (12): 3210–3222. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02031.x. PMID19691504.
^McBeth, J. M.; Fleming, E. J.; Emerson, D. (2013). "The transition from freshwater to marine iron-oxidizing bacterial lineages along a salinity gradient on the Sheepscot River, Maine, USA". Environmental Microbiology Reports. 5 (3): 453–63. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12033. PMID23754725.
^ abcMcAllister, S. M.; Barnett, J. M.; Heiss, J. W.; Findlay, A. J.; MacDonald, D. J.; Dow, C. L.; Luther, G. W.; Michael, H. A.; Chan, C. S. (2015). "Dynamic hydrologic and biogeochemical processes drive microbially enhanced iron and sulfur cycling within the intertidal mixing zone of a beach aquifer". Limnology and Oceanography. 60 (1): 329–345. Bibcode:2015LimOc..60..329M. doi:10.1002/lno.10029.
^ abDang, H.; Chen, R.; Wang, L.; Shao, S.; Dai, L.; Ye, Y.; Guo, L.; Huang, G.; Klotz, M. G. (2011). "Molecular characterization of putative biocorroding microbiota with a novel niche detection of Epsilon- and Zetaproteobacteria in Pacific Ocean coastal seawaters". Environmental Microbiology. 13 (11): 3059–3074. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02583.x. PMID21951343.
^ abComolli, L. R.; Luef, B.; Chan, C. S. (2011). "High-resolution 2D and 3D cryo-TEM reveals structural adaptations of two stalk-forming bacteria to an Fe-oxidizing lifestyle". Environmental Microbiology. 13 (11): 2915–2929. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02567.x. PMID21895918.
^Saini, G.; Chan, C. S. (2013). "Near-neutral surface charge and hydrophilicity prevent mineral encrustation of Fe-oxidizing micro-organisms". Geobiology. 11 (2): 191–200. doi:10.1111/gbi.12021. PMID23279435.
^ abcFleming, E. J.; Davis, R. E.; McAllister, S. M.; Chan, C. S.; Moyer, C. L.; Tebo, B. M.; Emerson, D. (2013). "Hidden in plain sight: Discovery of sheath-forming, iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteriaat Loihi Seamount, Hawaii, USA". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 85 (1): 116–127. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12104. PMID23480633.
^Juniper, S. Kim; Yves Fouquet (1988). "Filamentous iron-silica deposits from modern and ancient hydrothermal sites". Canadian Mineralogist. 26: 859–869.
^Hofmann, B. A.; Farmer, J. D.; von Blanckenburg, F.; Fallick, A. E. (2008). "Subsurface Filamentous Fabrics: An Evaluation of Origins Based on Morphological and Geochemical Criteria, with Implications for Exopaleontology". Astrobiology. 8 (1): 87–117. Bibcode:2008AsBio...8...87H. doi:10.1089/ast.2007.0130. PMID18241094.
^Planavsky, N.; Rouxel, O.; Bekker, A.; Shapiro, R.; Fralick, P.; Knudsen, A. (2009). "Iron-oxidizing microbial ecosystems thrived in late Paleoproterozoic redox-stratified oceans". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 286 (1–2): 230–242. Bibcode:2009E&PSL.286..230P. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.06.033.
^Krepski, S. T.; Emerson, D.; Hredzak-Showalter, P. L.; Luther, G. W.; Chan, C. S. (2013). "Morphology of biogenic iron oxides records microbial physiology and environmental conditions: Toward interpreting iron microfossils". Geobiology. 11 (5): 457–71. doi:10.1111/gbi.12043. PMID23790206.
^Bennett, S. A.; Toner, B. M.; Barco, R.; Edwards, K. J. (2014). "Carbon adsorption onto Fe oxyhydroxide stalks produced by a lithotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria". Geobiology. 12 (2): 146–156. doi:10.1111/gbi.12074. PMID24428517.
^Rassa, A. C.; McAllister, S. M.; Safran, S. A.; Moyer, C. L. (2009). "Zeta-ProteobacteriaDominate the Colonization and Formation of Microbial Mats in Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Vents at Loihi Seamount, Hawaii". Geomicrobiology Journal. 26 (8): 623–638. doi:10.1080/01490450903263350.
^Emerson, D.; Moyer, C. (2010). "Microbiology of Seamounts: Common Patterns Observed in Community Structure". Oceanography. 23: 148–163. doi:10.5670/oceanog.2010.67.
^Sudek, L. A.; Templeton, A. S.; Tebo, B. M.; Staudigel, H. (2009). "Microbial Ecology of Fe (hydr)oxide Mats and Basaltic Rock from Vailulu'u Seamount, American Samoa". Geomicrobiology Journal. 26 (8): 581–596. doi:10.1080/01490450903263400.
^Meyer-Dombard, D. A. R.; Amend, J. P.; Osburn, M. R. (2012). "Microbial diversity and potential for arsenic and iron biogeochemical cycling at an arsenic rich, shallow-sea hydrothermal vent (Tutum Bay, Papua New Guinea)". Chemical Geology. 348: 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.02.024.
^Li, J.; Zhou, H.; Peng, X.; Wu, Z.; Chen, S.; Fang, J. (2012). "Microbial diversity and biomineralization in low-temperature hydrothermal iron-silica-rich precipitates of the Lau Basin hydrothermal field". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 81 (1): 205–216. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01367.x. PMID22443540.
^Dekov, V. M.; Petersen, S.; Garbe-Schönberg, C. -D.; Kamenov, G. D.; Perner, M.; Kuzmann, E.; Schmidt, M. (2010). "Fe–Si-oxyhydroxide deposits at a slow-spreading centre with thickened oceanic crust: The Lilliput hydrothermal field (9°33′S, Mid-Atlantic Ridge)". Chemical Geology. 278 (3–4): 186–200. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.09.012.
^ abcMacDonald, D. J.; Findlay, A. J.; McAllister, S. M.; Barnett, J. M.; Hredzak-Showalter, P.; Krepski, S. T.; Cone, S. G.; Scott, J.; Bennett, S. K.; Chan, C. S.; Emerson, D.; Luther Iii, G. W. (2014). "Using in situ voltammetry as a tool to identify and characterize habitats of iron-oxidizing bacteria: From fresh water wetlands to hydrothermal vent sites". Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. 16 (9): 2117. doi:10.1039/c4em00073k.
^Kato, S.; Ikehata, K.; Shibuya, T.; Urabe, T.; Ohkuma, M.; Yamagishi, A. (2015). "Potential for biogeochemical cycling of sulfur, iron and carbon within massive sulfide deposits below the seafloor". Environmental Microbiology. 17 (5): 1817–35. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12648. PMID25330135.
^Emerson, J. B.; Thomas, B. C.; Alvarez, W.; Banfield, J. F. (2015). "Metagenomic analysis of a high carbon dioxide subsurface microbial community populated by chemolithoautotrophs and bacteria and archaea from candidate phyla". Environmental Microbiology. 18 (6): 1686–1703. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12817. PMID25727367.
^Colman, D. R.; Garcia, J. R.; Crossey, L. J.; Karlstrom, K.; Jackson-Weaver, O.; Takacs-Vesbach, C. (2014). "An analysis of geothermal and carbonic springs in the western United States sustained by deep fluid inputs". Geobiology. 12: 83–98. doi:10.1111/gbi.12070. PMID24286205.
^Ionescu, D.; Heim, C.; Polerecky, L.; Ramette, A.; Haeusler, S.; Bizic-Ionescu, M.; Thiel, V.; De Beer, D. (2015). "Diversity of Iron Oxidizing and Reducing Bacteria in Flow Reactors in the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory". Geomicrobiology Journal. 32 (3–4): 207–220. doi:10.1080/01490451.2014.884196.
^Zbinden, M.; Cambon-Bonavita, M. A. (2003). "Occurrence of Deferribacterales and Entomoplasmatales in the deep-sea Alvinocarid shrimp Rimicaris exoculata gut". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 46 (1): 23–30. doi:10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00176-4. PMID19719579.
^ abGlazer, B. T.; Rouxel, O. J. (2009). "Redox Speciation and Distribution within Diverse Iron-dominated Microbial Habitats at Loihi Seamount". Geomicrobiology Journal. 26 (8): 606–622. doi:10.1080/01490450903263392.
^Kato, Shingo (2015). "Ecophysiology of neutrophilic iron-oxidizing microorganisms and its significance in global biogeochemical cycling". Chikyukagaku (Geochemistry). 49: 1–17. doi:10.14934/chikyukagakuI.1 (inactive 2019-10-14).
^Melton, E. D.; Swanner, E. D.; Behrens, S.; Schmidt, C.; Kappler, A. (2014). "The interplay of microbially mediated and abiotic reactions in the biogeochemical Fe cycle". Nature Reviews Microbiology. 12 (12): 797–808. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3347. PMID25329406.