This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.
Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ProZ.com have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 16:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to ProZ.com. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. diff . Tornado chaser (talk) 16:25, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
This box feels WP:SOAPY
Hi Marianna, I admit that the very last sentence was a way for me to let out the steam because those people a REAL RASCALS - as admitted by ALL TRANSLATORS AND ALL VALUABLE TRANSLATION AGENCIES - I even added A LINK PROVING THAT THIS WAS NOT MY SOLE POINT OF VIEW BUT THAT OF MOST IF NOT ALL TRANSLATORS.
So WHY ON EARTH DID YOU HAVE THE GUTS OF DELETING MY ENTIRE ENTRY JUST BECAUSE OF AN UNDERSTANDABLE LAST SENTENCE?
THOSE PEOPLE ARE CROOKS AND THE WORLD MUST KNOW!
ENTERING CRITICISMS IS PART OF THE WIKIPEDIA PROCESS.
LICKING CROOKS' BOOTS WILL NOT HELP.
THIS DOES NOT AFFECT THE SO-CALLED "NEUTRAL" POINT OF VIEW.
IT IS MADE OUT OF POSITIVE ***AND*** NEGATIVE REMARKS.
AS TO TORNADO CHASER: GO GET FUCKED!!! YOU MUST BE ONE OF THOSE PSYCHOPATHS HIDING UNDER THE TITLE OF "WIKIPEDIA ADMINISTRATOR"
If you fucking asshole had only READ the CONTENT OF MY LINK
THE FUCKING IMBECILE YOU ARE WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THIS WAS NOT JUST MY PERSONAL POINT OF VIEW.
I AM SICK AND TIRED OF BEING CRITICIZED BY IMBECILES AND DISHONEST ASSHOLES.
GO GET FUCKED.
IF YOU PSYCHOPATHS CANNOT UNDERSTAND THAT A NORMAL HUMAN BEING (CONTRARY TO YOU) HAS EMOTIONS AND FEELINGS AND THAT LETTING THE STEAM OUT ON (ONLY) THE VERY LAST SENTENCE IS UNDERSTANDABLE
THEN YOU PLACE IS IN PRISON
AND CERTAINLY NOT TROLLING AROUND AS FUCKING WIKIPEDIA "AD-MI-NI-STRA-TORS".
YOU GOT THAT?
Hello Marjoram Curry, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Colonel Tom Parker have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
This box feels WP:SOAPY
Why don't you just change whatever detail bothers you,
rather than shockingly deleting hours of valuable work?
PSYCHOPATHS ARE NOT ADMITTED AS ADMINISTRATORS.
AND THEIR POINTS OF VIEW WILL BE THROWN TO TRASH.
GOT IT, NEO-ZIONIST INTRODUCING CENSORSHIP IN ENCYCLOPEDIAS?...
VAN KUIJK WAS A WELL-KNOWN PSYCHOPATH
AND YOUR FUCKING ENCYCLOPEDIA
DOES NOT REFLECT THIS.
IT IS NO LONGER AN ENCYCLOPEDIA.
IT IS CENSORSHIP
TO PROTECT THE DICTATORSHIP
OF MENTALLY ILL NEO-ZIONISTS.
THIS IS MY CONCLUSION.
AND THE ENTIRE WORLD WILL KNOW.
TRUST ME ON THIS :-)