This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.
|WikiProject United States|
|This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Victoria University of Wellington supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.|
This sentence slightly fails NPOV
"The university started an investigation about the research, which went on for nearly two years hindering the publication of the findings that had great importance for the public."
Also in what is now the subsequent section the phrase "considerable evidence" is used like a delimiter of fact.
I'm not going to change anything, but whoever wrote this can do better. Saying that publication was 'hindered' isn't a fair representation if facts are disputed. You have to use a neutral word here. And using the phrase "considerable evidence" like a hammer to drive home a point is sloppy or at least orig research.Createangelos (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)