The Moklenic or Moken–Moklen languages consist of a pair of two closely related but distinct languages, namely Moken and Moklen. Larish (1999) establishes the two languages as forming two distinct subgroups of a larger Moken–Moklen branch. Larish (2005) suggests Moklenic as an alternative name for Moken–Moklen, the latter term which was originally used by Larish (1999).
Moken, spoken by about 2,500-3,000 Moken people or "Sea Gypsies" of Thailand and Myanmar.
Moklen, spoken by 2,500-3,000 Moklen people of southern Thailand.
Moken and Moklen are linguistically and culturally related but distinct from each other, with Moken speakers primarily being sea-based hunter-gatherers, while Moklen speakers are land-based people living in villages and towns of southern Thailand (Larish 2005). Comparative studies of Moken and Moklen include those of Leerabhandh (1984), Makboon (1981), and Larish (1999).
The Moklenic languages are spoken along a 650-kilometer stretch of the west coast of southern Myanmar and southern Thailand, from Tavoy Island, Burma to Phi Phi Island, Thailand (Larish 2005). Moken has a very wide distribution, while Moklen is exclusively spoken on the western coast of southern Thailand. Moklen displays heavy Southern Thai influence and is more endangered than Moken.
Larish (1999, 2005) considers Moklenic to be a sister of the Chamic and Malayic languages rather than as part of them. Moklenic languages have also been strongly influenced by Austroasiatic languages, with many of those Austroasiatic loanwords, such as 'bird', also found in Chamic.
Larish (1999) classifies the two languages Moken and Moklen as part of a larger Moklenic–Acehnese-Chamic-Malayic ("MACM") subgroup.
Proto-Moken-Moklen has been reconstructed by Larish (1999).
^Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2017). "Moken–Moklen". Glottolog 3.0. Jena, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
^ abcLarish, Michael. 2005. "Moken and Moklen." in Alexander Adelaar and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 513-533. London: Routledge. ISBN0-7007-1286-0.
^Leerabhandh, S. (1984) Phonological reconstruction of Proto Orang-Laut, MA Thesis at Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development, Salaya Campus.
^Makboon, S. (1981) Survey of Sea People’s dialects along the West Coast of Thailand, MA Thesis at Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Language and Culture for Rural Development.
^ abcLarish, Michael David. 1999. The Position of Moken and Moklen Within the Austronesian Language Family. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa.
^Smith, Alexander D. (2017). "The Western Malayo-Polynesian Problem". Oceanic Linguistics. 56 (2): 435–490. doi:10.1353/ol.2017.0021.
Larish, Michael David (1991). ‘The special relationship between Moken, Acehnese, Chamic and Mon-Khmer: Areal influence or genetic affinity?’ Unpublished paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Honoluluπ University of Hawai'i.
Larish, Michael David (1993) ‘Who are the Moken and Moklen on the Islands and Coasts of the Andaman Sea?’ in Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University, January 8–10, 1992, volume III:1305–19, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House.
Larish, Michael David (1997) ‘Moklen-Moken phonology: Mainland or insular Southeast Asian typology?’, in C. Odé and W. Stokhof (eds), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 125–50, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Naw Say Bay. 1995. "The phonology of the Dung dialect of Moken", in Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 13, Studies in Burmese Languages, ed. D. Bradley, vol. 13, pp. 193–205. Pacific Linguistics, the Australian National University.