This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.

In mathematics, an **inequality** is a relation that connects two numbers or other mathematical objects. (see also: equality).

- The notation
*a*<*b*means that*a*is**less than***b*. - The notation
*a*>*b*means that*a*is**greater than***b*.

- In either case,
*a*is not equal to*b*. These relations are known as**strict inequalities**, meaning that*a*is strictly less than*b*.

In contrast to strict inequalities, there are two types of inequality relations that are not strict:

- The notation
*a*≤*b*or*a*⩽*b*means that*a*is**less than or equal to***b*(or, equivalently,**not greater than***b*, or**at most***b*). - The notation
*a*≥*b*or*a*⩾*b*means that*a*is**greater than or equal to***b*(or, equivalently,**not less than***b*, or**at least***b*).

- "not greater than" can also be represented by
*a*≯*b*, the symbol for "greater than" bisected by a vertical line, "not". The same is true for "not less then" and*a*≮*b*.

If the values in question are elements of an ordered set, such as the integers or the real numbers, they can be compared in size.

- The notation
*a*≠*b*means that*a*is**not equal to***b*.

- It does not say that one is greater than the other, or even that they can be compared in size.

In engineering sciences, less formal use of the notation is to state that one quantity is "much greater" than another, normally by several orders of magnitude. This implies that the lesser value can be neglected with little effect on the accuracy of an approximation. (For example, the ultrarelativistic limit in physics.)

- The notation
*a*≪*b*means that*a*is**much less than***b*. (In measure theory, however, this notation is used for absolute continuity, an unrelated concept.) - The notation
*a*≫*b*means that*a*is**much greater than***b*.

In all of the cases above, any two symbols mirroring each other are symmetrical; *a* < *b* and *b* > *a* are equivalent, etc.

- Properties on the number line
- Formal Definitions and Generalizations
- Chained notation
- Sharp inequalities
- Inequalities between means
- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality
- Power inequalities
- Well-known inequalities
- Complex numbers and inequalities
- Vector inequalities
- General existence theorems
- See also
- References
- Sources
- External links

Inequalities are governed by the following properties. All of these properties also hold if all of the non-strict inequalities (≤ and ≥) are replaced by their corresponding strict inequalities (< and >) and (in the case of applying a function) monotonic functions are limited to *strictly* monotonic functions.

The relations ≤ and ≥ are each other's converse, meaning that for any real numbers *a* and *b*:

*a*≤*b*and*b*≥*a*are equivalent.

The transitive property of inequality states that for any real numbers *a*, *b*, *c*:^{[1]}

- If
*a*≤*b*and*b*≤*c*, then*a*≤*c*.

If *either* of the premises is a strict inequality, then the conclusion is a strict inequality:

- If
*a*≤*b*and*b*<*c*, then*a*<*c*. - If
*a*<*b*and*b*≤*c*, then*a*<*c*.

A common constant *c* may be added to or subtracted from both sides of an inequality. So, for any real numbers *a*, *b*, *c*:

- If
*a*≤*b*, then*a*+*c*≤*b*+*c*and*a*−*c*≤*b*−*c*.

i.e., the real numbers are an ordered group under addition.

The properties that deal with multiplication and division state that for any real numbers, *a*, *b* and non-zero *c*:

- If
*a*≤*b*and*c*> 0, then*ac*≤*bc*and*a*/*c*≤*b*/*c*. - If
*a*≤*b*and*c*< 0, then*ac*≥*bc*and*a*/*c*≥*b*/*c*.

More generally, this applies for an ordered field; for more information, read the section *Ordered fields*.

The property for the additive inverse states that for any real numbers *a* and *b*:

- If
*a*≤*b*, then −*a*≥ −*b*.

If both numbers are positive, the relation between the multiplicative inverses us the opposite of the relation between the original number. more generally, for any non-zero real numbers *a* and *b* that are both positive or both negative:

- If
*a*≤*b*, then 1/*a*≥ 1/*b*.

All of the cases for the signs of *a* and *b* can also be written in chained notation as follows:

- If 0 <
*a*≤*b*, then 1/*a*≥ 1/*b*> 0. - If
*a*≤*b*< 0, then 0 > 1/*a*≥ 1/*b*. - If
*a*< 0 <*b*, then 1/*a*< 0 < 1/*b*.

Any monotonically increasing function may be applied to both sides of an inequality, provided they are in the domain of that function, and it will still hold. Applying a monotonically decreasing function to both sides of an inequality means the opposite inequality now holds. The rules for the additive inverse, and the multiplicative inverse for positive numbers, are both examples of applying a monotonically decreasing function.

If the inequality is strict (*a* < *b*, *a* > *b*) *and* the function is strictly monotonic, then the inequality remains strict. If only one of these conditions is strict, then the resultant inequality is non-strict. The rules for additive and multiplicative inverses are both examples of applying a *strictly* monotonically decreasing function.

A few examples of this rule are:

- Exponentiating both sides of an inequality by
*n*> 0 when*a*and*b*are positive real numbers:

*a*≤*b*⇔*a*≤^{n}*b*.^{n}*a*≤*b*⇔*a*^{−n}≥*b*^{−n}.

- Taking the natural logarithm to both sides of an inequality when
*a*and*b*are positive real numbers:

*a*≤*b*⇔ ln(*a*) ≤ ln(*b*).*a*<*b*⇔ ln(*a*) < ln(*b*).- This is true because the natural logarithm is a strictly increasing function.

A (non-strict) **partial order** is a binary relation ≤ over a set *P* which is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive.^{[2]} That is, for all *a*, *b*, and *c* in *P*, it must satisfy:

*a*≤*a*(reflexivity)- if
*a*≤*b*and*b*≤*a*, then*a*=*b*(antisymmetry) - if
*a*≤*b*and*b*≤*c*, then*a*≤*c*(transitivity)

A set with a partial order is called a **partially ordered set**. Those are the very basic axioms, that every kind of order has to satisfy. other axioms that exist for other definitions of orders on a set *P* include:

*a*≤*b*or*b*≤*a*for every*a*and*b*(total order)- for all
*a*and*b*for which*a*<*b*, there is a*c*in*P*such that*a*<*c*<*b*(dense order) - every non-empty subset of
*P*with an upper bound has a*least*upper bound (supremum) in*P*(least-upper-bound property)

If (*F*, +, ×) is a field and ≤ is a total order on *F*, then (*F*, +, ×, ≤) is called an **ordered field** if and only if:

*a*≤*b*implies*a*+*c*≤*b*+*c*;- 0 ≤
*a*and 0 ≤*b*implies 0 ≤*a*×*b*.

Both (**Q**, +, ×, ≤) and (**R**, +, ×, ≤) are ordered fields, but ≤ cannot be defined in order to make (**C**, +, ×, ≤) an ordered field, because −1 is the square of *i* and would therefore be positive.

Besides from being an ordered field, **R** also has the Least-upper-bound property. **R** can be defined as the only ordered field with that quality.^{[3]}

The notation ** a < b < c** stands for "

This notation can be generalized to any number of terms: for instance, ** a_{1} ≤ a_{2} ≤ ... ≤ a_{n}** means that

When solving inequalities using chained notation, it is possible and sometimes necessary to evaluate the terms independently. For instance, to solve the inequality 4*x* < 2*x* + 1 ≤ 3*x* + 2, it is not possible to isolate *x* in any one part of the inequality through addition or subtraction. Instead, the inequalities must be solved independently, yielding *x* < 1/2 and *x* ≥ −1 respectively, which can be combined into the final solution −1 ≤ *x* < 1/2.

Occasionally, chained notation is used with inequalities in different directions, in which case the meaning is the logical conjunction of the inequalities between adjacent terms. For instance, *a* < *b* = *c* ≤ *d* means that *a* < *b*, *b* = *c*, and *c* ≤ *d*. This notation exists in a few programming languages such as Python.

An inequality is said to be *sharp*, if it cannot be *relaxed* and still be valid in general. Formally, a universally quantified inequality *φ* is called sharp if, for every valid universally quantified inequality *ψ*, if *ψ* ⇒ *φ* holds, then *ψ* ⇔ *φ* also holds. For instance, the inequality ∀*a* ∈ ℝ. *a*^{2} ≥ 0 is sharp, whereas the inequality ∀*a* ∈ ℝ. *a*^{2} ≥ −1 is not sharp.^{[citation needed]}

There are many inequalities between means. For example, for any positive numbers *a*_{1}, *a*_{2}, …, *a*_{n} we have *H* ≤ *G* ≤ *A* ≤ *Q*, where

(harmonic mean), (geometric mean), (arithmetic mean), (quadratic mean).

The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality states that for all vectors *u* and *v* of an inner product space it is true that

where is the inner product. Examples of inner products include the real and complex dot product; In Euclidean space *R*^{n} with the standard inner product, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is

A "**power inequality**" is an inequality containing terms of the form *a*^{b}, where *a* and *b* are real positive numbers or variable expressions. They often appear in mathematical olympiads exercises.

- For any real
*x*,

- If
*x*> 0 and*p*> 0, then

- In the limit of
*p*→ 0, the upper and lower bounds converge to ln(*x*).

- If
*x*> 0, then

- If
*x*≥ 1, then

- If
*x*,*y*,*z*> 0, then

- For any real distinct numbers
*a*and*b*,

- If
*x*,*y*> 0 and 0 <*p*< 1, then

- If
*x*,*y*,*z*> 0, then

- If
*a*,*b*> 0, then

- This inequality was solved by I.Ilani in JSTOR,AMM,Vol.97,No.1,1990.

- If
*a*,*b*> 0, then

- This inequality was solved by S.Manyama in AJMAA,Vol.7,Issue 2,No.1,2010 and by V.Cirtoaje in JNSA, Vol.4, Issue 2, 130–137, 2011.

- If
*a*,*b*,*c*> 0, then

- If
*a*,*b*> 0, then

Mathematicians often use inequalities to bound quantities for which exact formulas cannot be computed easily. Some inequalities are used so often that they have names:

- Azuma's inequality
- Bernoulli's inequality
- Bell's inequality
- Boole's inequality
- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality
- Chebyshev's inequality
- Chernoff's inequality
- Cramér–Rao inequality
- Hoeffding's inequality
- Hölder's inequality
- Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means
- Jensen's inequality
- Kolmogorov's inequality
- Markov's inequality
- Minkowski inequality
- Nesbitt's inequality
- Pedoe's inequality
- Poincaré inequality
- Samuelson's inequality
- Triangle inequality

The set of complex numbers with its operations of addition and multiplication is a field, but it is impossible to define any relation ≤ so that becomes an ordered field. To make an ordered field, it would have to satisfy the following two properties:

- if
*a*≤*b*, then*a*+*c*≤*b*+*c*; - if 0 ≤
*a*and 0 ≤*b*, then 0 ≤*a b*.

Because ≤ is a total order, for any number *a*, either 0 ≤ *a* or *a* ≤ 0 (in which case the first property above implies that 0 ≤ −*a*). In either case 0 ≤ *a*^{2}; this means that and ; so and , which means ; contradiction.

However, an operation ≤ can be defined so as to satisfy only the first property (namely, "if *a* ≤ *b*, then *a* + *c* ≤ *b* + *c*"). Sometimes the lexicographical order definition is used:

- , if or and

It can easily be proven that for this definition *a* ≤ *b* implies *a* + *c* ≤ *b* + *c*.

Inequality relationships similar to those defined above can also be defined for column vectors. If we let the vectors (meaning that and , where and are real numbers for ), we can define the following relationships:

- , if for .
- , if for .
- , if for and .
- , if for .

Similarly, we can define relationships for , , and . This notation is consistent with that used by Matthias Ehrgott in *Multicriteria Optimization* (see References).

The trichotomy property (as stated above) is not valid for vector relationships. For example, when and , there exists no valid inequality relationship between these two vectors. Also, a multiplicative inverse would need to be defined on a vector before this property could be considered. However, for the rest of the aforementioned properties, a parallel property for vector inequalities exists.

For a general system of polynomial inequalities, one can find a condition for a solution to exist. Firstly, any system of polynomial inequalities can be reduced to a system of quadratic inequalities by increasing the number of variables and equations (for example, by setting a square of a variable equal to a new variable). A single quadratic polynomial inequality in *n* − 1 variables can be written as

where *X* is a vector of the variables , and *A* is a matrix. This has a solution, for example, when there is at least one positive element on the main diagonal of *A*.

Systems of inequalities can be written in terms of matrices *A*, *B*, *C*, etc., and the conditions for existence of solutions can be written as complicated expressions in terms of these matrices. The solution for two polynomial inequalities in two variables tells us whether two conic section regions overlap or are inside each other. The general solution is not known, but such a solution could be theoretically used to solve such unsolved problems as the kissing number problem. However, the conditions would be so complicated as to require a great deal of computing time or clever algorithms.

- Binary relation
- Bracket (mathematics), for the use of similar ‹ and › signs as brackets
- Fourier–Motzkin elimination
- Inclusion (set theory)
- Inequation
- Interval (mathematics)
- List of inequalities
- List of triangle inequalities
- Partially ordered set
- Relational operators, used in programming languages to denote inequality

**^**Drachman, Bryon C.; Cloud, Michael J. (2006).*Inequalities: With Applications to Engineering*. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 2–3. ISBN 0-3872-2626-5.**^**Simovici, Dan A. & Djeraba, Chabane (2008). "Partially Ordered Sets".*Mathematical Tools for Data Mining: Set Theory, Partial Orders, Combinatorics*. Springer. ISBN 9781848002012.**^**Stewart, Ian (2007).*Why Beauty Is Truth: The History of Symmetry*. Hachette UK. p. 106. ISBN 0-4650-0875-5.

- Hardy, G., Littlewood J. E., Pólya, G. (1999).
*Inequalities*. Cambridge Mathematical Library, Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-05206-8.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Beckenbach, E. F., Bellman, R. (1975).
*An Introduction to Inequalities*. Random House Inc. ISBN 0-394-01559-2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Drachman, Byron C., Cloud, Michael J. (1998).
*Inequalities: With Applications to Engineering*. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-98404-6.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Grinshpan, A. Z. (2005), "General inequalities, consequences, and applications",
*Advances in Applied Mathematics*,**34**(1): 71–100, doi:10.1016/j.aam.2004.05.001 - Murray S. Klamkin. "'Quickie' inequalities" (PDF).
*Math Strategies*. - Arthur Lohwater (1982). "Introduction to Inequalities". Online e-book in PDF format.
- Harold Shapiro (2005, 1972–1985). "Mathematical Problem Solving".
*The Old Problem Seminar*. Kungliga Tekniska högskolan. Check date values in:`|date=`

(help) - "3rd USAMO". Archived from the original on 2008-02-03.
- Pachpatte, B. G. (2005).
*Mathematical Inequalities*. North-Holland Mathematical Library.**67**(first ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-51795-2. ISSN 0924-6509. MR 2147066. Zbl 1091.26008. - Ehrgott, Matthias (2005).
*Multicriteria Optimization*. Springer-Berlin. ISBN 3-540-21398-8. - Steele, J. Michael (2004).
*The Cauchy-Schwarz Master Class: An Introduction to the Art of Mathematical Inequalities*. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54677-5.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to .Inequalities (mathematics) |

- Hazewinkel, Michiel, ed. (2001) [1994], "Inequality",
*Encyclopedia of Mathematics*, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4 - Graph of Inequalities by Ed Pegg, Jr., Wolfram Demonstrations Project.
- AoPS Wiki entry about Inequalities