According to a 2009 paper authored by GTx, "Readers are cautioned to note that the name ostarine is often mistakenly linked to the chemical structure of [S-4], which is also known as andarine. The chemical structure of ostarine has not been publicly disclosed." A 2009 review stated "Recently, GTx disclosed that compound 5 had advanced into clinical trials. The patent application described detailed data in an initial proof-of-concept Phase IIa clinical trial. It is not explicitly stated that compound 5 is Ostarine (MK-2866).
As of now, the mechanism of action of Enobosarm is still being debated and requires further investigation.
By 2007, enobosarm was in a Phase II trial, and that year GTx signed an exclusive license agreement for its SARM program with Merck & Co. The companies ended the deal in 2010.
In August 2011, there was a double-blind, placebo controlled phase II trial that focused on elderly men and postmenopausal women concluded that Enobosarm showed statistically significant improvements in total lean body mass and physical function without the negative side effects that are normally present with steroids.
In August 2013, GTx announced that enobosarm had failed in two Phase III clinical trials to treat wasting in people with lung cancer. The company had invested around $35 million in the development of the drug. The company said at that time that is planned to pursue approval of enobosarm in Europe; the company was also still developing GTx-758 for castration-resistant prostate cancer.
In 2016, GTx began Phase II trials, to see if enosobarm might be effective to treat stress urinary incontinence in women.
In 2018, GTx announced the Phase II trials on Enobosarm's efficacy on stress urinary incontinence in women failed to achieve its primary endpoint in the ASTRID Trial.
The FDA have warned that SARMs can have serious side effects ranging from risk of heart attack to stroke and liver damage.
Society and culture
SARMs including enobosarm may be and have been used by athletes to assist in training and increase physical stamina and fitness, potentially producing effects similar to anabolic steroids. For this reason, SARMs were banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency in January 2008, despite no drugs from this class yet being in clinical use, and blood tests for all known SARMs have been developed. There are a variety of known cases of doping in sports with enobosarm by professionalathletes.
^Mohler ML, Bohl CE, Jones A, Coss CC, Narayanan R, He Y, et al. (June 2009). "Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs): dissociating the anabolic and androgenic activities of the androgen receptor for therapeutic benefit". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 52 (12): 3597–617. doi:10.1021/jm900280m. PMID19432422.
^Dubois V, Laurent M, Boonen S, Vanderschueren D, Claessens F (May 2012). "Androgens and skeletal muscle: cellular and molecular action mechanisms underlying the anabolic actions". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 69 (10): 1651–67. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0883-3. PMID22101547.
^Thevis M, Kohler M, Thomas A, Maurer J, Schlörer N, Kamber M, Schänzer W (May 2008). "Determination of benzimidazole- and bicyclic hydantoin-derived selective androgen receptor antagonists and agonists in human urine using LC-MS/MS". Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 391 (1): 251–61. doi:10.1007/s00216-008-1882-6. PMID18270691.