This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.

Bottineau LRT

Bottineau LRT
Overview
Type Light rail
System Metro Transit
Status Engineering phase[2]
Locale Hennepin County, Minnesota
Termini Brooklyn Park, Minnesota
Target Field, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Stations 11 planned
Daily ridership 27,000 (2030)[1]
Operation
Planned opening 2022; 4 years' time (2022)
Character Surface
Technical
Track gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Electrification Overhead lines
Route map

 
Oak Grove Parkway
93rd Avenue
85th Avenue
Shingle Creek
Brooklyn Boulevard
63rd Avenue
Parking
Bass Lake Road
ParkingPrivate airfield
Robbinsdale
Parking
North Rice Pond/Grimes Pond
Golden Valley Road
Parking
Plymouth Ave/Theodore Wirth Park
Penn Avenue
Van White Boulevard
Target Field
 Blue  and  Green  lines

The Bottineau LRT (Metro Blue Line Extension) is a proposed light rail line extension in the Minneapolis – Saint Paul Metro area, projected to run northwest from downtown Minneapolis along County Road 81 to Brooklyn Park. If built, Bottineau LRT would be the next light rail line in the Twin Cities after the Southwest LRT.[3]

Alignment alternatives

The Bottineau Transitway Alternative Analysis Study, released in 2009, outlined several different alternatives for both the northern and southern ends of the corridor.[4] In 2010, the final AA report recommended the A-D1 light rail alignment as the best option, but also suggested B-D1, A-D2 and B-D2 should continue to be studied. A-D1 and B-D1 were also recommended for continued study as possible bus rapid transit alignments.[5]

Northern alternatives

There are two northern alternatives:

Alternative A begins in Maple Grove, Minnesota and runs along Arbor Lakes Parkway and 77th Avenue from Hemlock Lane to the railroad tracks of BNSF Railway's Monticello Subdivision. The potential stations were Hemlock Lane, Zachary Lane, Boone Avenue and 71st Avenue.

Alternative B begins in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota near Target North Corporate Campus and runs south along West Broadway to the BNSF railroad tracks. The potential stations are 97th Avenue, 93rd Avenue, 85th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard. 71st Avenue Station, though it would run along this alignment's right-of-way, would not be built if this alternative was selected.

Middle segment

Through the middle portion of the corridor, the study has selected a single alternative. This alternative follows the BNSF right-of-way, paralleling County Road 81, from Interstate 694 to 36th Avenue. The proposed stations are 63rd Avenue, Bass Lake Road and Robbinsdale Transit Center. This alignment is known as Alternative C.

Southern alternatives

The southern part of the corridor has four potential alignments. Three could be used for light rail or bus rapid transit and one would be strictly for bus rapid transit. Every alternative would still terminate at Target Field station.

Alternative D1 would continue to follow the BNSF right of way south to Olson Memorial Highway (Minnesota State Highway 55) and would follow Olson Memorial Highway into downtown. Stations would be located at Theodore Wirth Park, Golden Valley Road, Penn Avenue and Van White Boulevard.

Alternative D2 would run entirely along streets, instead of partially along railroad right-of-way. It would follow West Broadway to Penn Avenue and Penn Avenue to Olson Memorial Highway into downtown. Stations would be located at North Memorial Medical Center, West Broadway at Penn Ave, Penn Ave at Plymouth Ave and Olson Memorial Highway at Van White Boulevard.

Two additional alternatives, D3 and D4, were essentially eliminated in the 2010 report.[5]

Transit mode

The Northwest Corridor was proposed as a Tier I transitway, for rapid development, in the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Transportation Policy Plan published in 2004.[6] In a region with no operational light rail lines, ridership numbers appeared too low to justify the expense of light rail in this corridor. The line was fast-tracked for development into a busway and much of the work was completed to receive federal funding for construction of a busway.[7]

Though this corridor was advanced by the Metropolitan Council for development as a busway, the success of the Blue Line and lobbying by Hennepin County commissioner Mike Opat forced the mode choice to be re-evaluated. In March 2007, the Bottineau Partnership resolved to conduct an alternatives analysis rather than simply building the busway. Hennepin County commissioned a full Alternatives Analysis, to be completed by mid-2009.[8]

The recent creation of the Counties Transit Improvement Board, which controls a new dedicated transit tax for the Twin Cities region, has created a strong new push for light rail corridor development. According to the legislation enacting the Counties Transit Improvement Board, in order for a project to receive CTIB funding, it must be part of the Metropolitan Council's long-term transit plan; new planning documents released April 11, 2008 by the Metropolitan Council indicate that the Bottineau Corridor is a strong prospect for LRT, with numbers supporting LRT development.[9] Ridership predictions for the corridor, though lower than those for either the Central or Southwest corridors, are much higher than estimates before the opening of the Blue Line.

Alignment alternatives study results

The alternative analysis study concluded that the best alignment for the Bottineau Corridor would be light rail transit service using Alternatives B, C and D1. The line scored well overall for the three categories of Corridor Benefits, Development Opportunities and Environmental Impacts. The Cost/Benefit Analysis pushed this corridor to the highest position of the potential corridors. This corridor would serve an estimated 27,000 daily riders by 2030. It would take 29 minutes to travel from Brooklyn Park to downtown Minneapolis, a couple minutes more than average express bus service. The construction cost estimate for the corridor is $1 billion, in 2017 dollars. Though bus rapid transit would have cost significantly less, estimated at $560 million, it is also estimated that there would have been only 19,900 daily riders.[10]

Design

In August 2014, the Metropolitan Council received federal approval to enter the design phase for the Bottineau LRT, with service expected to begin in 2021. The $997 million light rail extension would be fifty percent funded by the Federal Transit Administration, 30 percent by the Counties Transit Improvement Board, 10 percent by Hennepin County and 10 percent by the state of Minnesota.[11] Kimley-Horn was awarded an engineering contract worth up to $110 million in September 2014.[12]

References

  1. ^ "Bottineau LRT community works". Hennepin County. Retrieved 10 May 2015. 
  2. ^ [1]
  3. ^ "Transit Projects". Metropolitan Council. Retrieved 29 March 2015. 
  4. ^ "Bottineau Transitway Alternatives Analysis Study Presentation" (PDF). Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2011-07-25. Retrieved 2009-10-09. 
  5. ^ a b "Bottineau Transitway Alternatives Analysis Study Final Report" (PDF). March 2010. Retrieved September 28, 2010. 
  6. ^ "2030 Transportation Policy Plan". Metropolitan Council. 2004-12-15. Archived from the original on 2004-08-26. Retrieved 2008-04-17. 
  7. ^ "LRT v. BRT". Bottineau Boulevard Partnership. 2007-03-13. Archived from the original on 2007-05-25. Retrieved 2007-04-22. 
  8. ^ "Bottineau Corridor". Hennepin County Railroad Authority. Retrieved 2008-04-17. [permanent dead link]
  9. ^ "Council Unveils Transit Study". Metropolitan Council. 2007-04-11. Archived from the original on 2008-07-20. Retrieved 2008-04-17. 
  10. ^ "Alternatives Analysis Summary Report" (PDF). BottineauTransitway. Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority. May 2013. Retrieved 10 May 2015. 
  11. ^ Vadis, Meredith (August 22, 2014). "Feds: Met Council Can Begin Designing Metro Blue Line Extension". Metropolitan Council. Retrieved 10 May 2015. 
  12. ^ Owings, Cali (September 25, 2014). "Kimley-Horn lands Bottineau LRT engineering contract". Finance & Commerce. Retrieved 10 May 2015. 

External links