The graph of the absolute value function for real numbers
The absolute value of a number may be thought of as its distance from zero.
In mathematics, the absolute value or modulus|x| of a real numberx is the non-negative value of x without regard to its sign. Namely, |x| = x for a positivex, |x| = −x for a negativex (in which case −x is positive), and |0| = 0. For example, the absolute value of 3 is 3, and the absolute value of −3 is also 3. The absolute value of a number may be thought of as its distance from zero.
In 1806, Jean-Robert Argand introduced the term module, meaning unit of measure in French, specifically for the complex absolute value, and it was borrowed into English in 1866 as the Latin equivalent modulus. The term absolute value has been used in this sense from at least 1806 in French and 1857 in English. The notation |x|, with a vertical bar on each side, was introduced by Karl Weierstrass in 1841. Other names for absolute value include numerical value and magnitude. In programming languages and computational software packages, the absolute value of x is generally represented by abs(x), or a similar expression.
The vertical bar notation also appears in a number of other mathematical contexts: for example, when applied to a set, it denotes its cardinality; when applied to a matrix, it denotes its determinant. Vertical bars denote the absolute value only for algebraic objects for which the notion of an absolute value is defined, notably an element of a normed division algebra, for example a real number, a complex number, or a quaternion. A closely related but distinct notation is the use of vertical bars for either the euclidean norm or sup norm of a vector in , although double vertical bars with subscripts ( and , respectively) are a more common and less ambiguous notation.
Definition and properties
For any real numberx, the absolute value or modulus of x is denoted by |x| (a vertical bar on each side of the quantity) and is defined as
The absolute value of x is thus always either positive or zero, but never negative: when x itself is negative (x < 0), then its absolute value is necessarily positive (|x| = −x > 0).
From an analytic geometry point of view, the absolute value of a real number is that number's distance from zero along the real number line, and more generally the absolute value of the difference of two real numbers is the distance between them. Indeed, the notion of an abstract distance function in mathematics can be seen to be a generalisation of the absolute value of the difference (see "Distance" below).
Since the square root symbol represents the unique positive square root (when applied to a positive number), it follows that
is equivalent to the definition above, and may be used as an alternative definition of the absolute value of real numbers.
The absolute value has the following four fundamental properties (a, b are real numbers), that are used for generalization of this notion to other domains:
Non-negativity, positive definiteness, and multiplicativity are readily apparent from the definition. To see that subadditivity holds, first note that one of the two alternatives of taking s as either –1 or +1 guarantees that Now, since and , it follows that, whichever is the value of s, one has for all real . Consequently, , as desired. (For a generalization of this argument to complex numbers, see "Proof of the triangle inequality for complex numbers" below.)
Some additional useful properties are given below. These are either immediate consequences of the definition or implied by the four fundamental properties above.
Idempotence (the absolute value of the absolute value is the absolute value)
Two other useful properties concerning inequalities are:
These relations may be used to solve inequalities involving absolute values. For example:
The absolute value, as "distance from zero", is used to define the absolute difference between arbitrary real numbers, the standard metric on the real numbers.
The absolute value of a complex number is the distance of from the origin. It is also seen in the picture that and its complex conjugate have the same absolute value.
Since the complex numbers are not ordered, the definition given at the top for the real absolute value cannot be directly applied to complex numbers. However, the geometric interpretation of the absolute value of a real number as its distance from 0 can be generalised. The absolute value of a complex number is defined by the Euclidean distance of its corresponding point in the complex plane from the origin. This can be computed using the Pythagorean theorem: for any complex number
where x and y are real numbers, the absolute value or modulus of z is denoted |z| and is defined by
where Re(z) = x and Im(z) = y denote the real and imaginary parts of z, respectively. When the imaginary part y is zero, this coincides with the definition of the absolute value of the real number x.
When a complex number z is expressed in its polar form as
with (and θ ∈ arg(z) is the argument (or phase) of z), its absolute value is
Since the product of any complex number z and its complex conjugate with the same absolute value, is always the non-negative real number , the absolute value of a complex number can be conveniently expressed as
resembling the alternative definition for reals:
The complex absolute value shares the four fundamental properties given above for the real absolute value.
The triangle inequality, as given by , can be demonstrated by applying three easily verified properties of the complex numbers: Namely, for every complex number ,
(i): there exists such that and ;
Also, for a family of complex numbers , . In particular,
(iii): if , then .
Proof of: Choose such that and (summed over ). The following computation then affords the desired inequality:
It is clear from this proof that equality holds in exactly if all the are non-negative real numbers, which in turn occurs exactly if all nonzero have the same argument, i.e., for a complex constant and real constants for .
Since measurable implies that is also measurable, the proof of the inequality proceeds via the same technique, by replacing with and with .
Absolute value function
The graph of the absolute value function for real numbers
Both the real and complex functions are idempotent.
Relationship to the sign function
The absolute value function of a real number returns its value irrespective of its sign, whereas the sign (or signum) function returns a number's sign irrespective of its value. The following equations show the relationship between these two functions:
The second derivative of |x| with respect to x is zero everywhere except zero, where it does not exist. As a generalised function, the second derivative may be taken as two times the Dirac delta function.
The antiderivative (indefinite integral) of the real absolute value function is
The absolute value is closely related to the idea of distance. As noted above, the absolute value of a real or complex number is the distance from that number to the origin, along the real number line, for real numbers, or in the complex plane, for complex numbers, and more generally, the absolute value of the difference of two real or complex numbers is the distance between them.
This can be seen as a generalisation, since for and real, i.e. in a 1-space, according to the alternative definition of the absolute value,
and for and complex numbers, i.e. in a 2-space,
The above shows that the "absolute value"-distance, for real and complex numbers, agrees with the standard Euclidean distance, which they inherit as a result of considering them as one and two-dimensional Euclidean spaces, respectively.
The properties of the absolute value of the difference of two real or complex numbers: non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles, symmetry and the triangle inequality given above, can be seen to motivate the more general notion of a distance function as follows:
A real valued function d on a set X × X is called a metric (or a distance function) on X, if it satisfies the following four axioms:
Identity of indiscernibles
The definition of absolute value given for real numbers above can be extended to any ordered ring. That is, if a is an element of an ordered ring R, then the absolute value of a, denoted by |a|, is defined to be:
The four fundamental properties of the absolute value for real numbers can be used to generalise the notion of absolute value to an arbitrary field, as follows.
A real-valued function v on a fieldF is called an absolute value (also a modulus, magnitude, value, or valuation) if it satisfies the following four axioms:
Subadditivity or the triangle inequality
Where 0 denotes the additive identity element of F. It follows from positive-definiteness and multiplicativity that v(1) = 1, where 1 denotes the multiplicative identity element of F. The real and complex absolute values defined above are examples of absolute values for an arbitrary field.
If v is an absolute value on F, then the function d on F × F, defined by d(a, b) = v(a − b), is a metric and the following are equivalent:
d satisfies the ultrametric inequality for all x, y, z in F.
is a norm called the Euclidean norm. When the real numbers R are considered as the one-dimensional vector space R1, the absolute value is a norm, and is the p-norm (see Lp space) for any p. In fact the absolute value is the "only" norm on R1, in the sense that, for every norm ‖·‖ on R1, ‖x‖ = ‖1‖ ⋅ |x|. The complex absolute value is a special case of the norm in an inner product space. It is identical to the Euclidean norm, if the complex plane is identified with the Euclidean planeR2.
In general the norm of a composition algebra may be a quadratic form that is not definite and has null vectors. However, as in the case of division algebras, when an element x has a non-zero norm, then x has a multiplicative inverse given by x*/N(x).
^James Mill Peirce, A Text-book of Analytic Geometryat Google Books. The oldest citation in the 2nd edition of the Oxford English Dictionary is from 1907. The term absolute value is also used in contrast to relative value.
^Nicholas J. Higham, Handbook of writing for the mathematical sciences, SIAM. ISBN0-89871-420-6, p. 25
^Spivak, Michael (1965). Calculus on Manifolds. Boulder, CO: Westview. p. 1. ISBN0805390219.
^Munkres, James (1991). Analysis on Manifolds. Boulder, CO: Westview. p. 4. ISBN0201510359.