This page uses content from Wikipedia and is licensed under CC BY-SA.

1980 Campeonato Brasileiro Série B

Campeonato Brasileiro Série B
Season1980
ChampionsLondrina (1st title)
PromotedLondrina
CSA
Matches played278
Goals scored677 (2.44 per match)
Top goalscorerOsmarzinho (Botafogo-SP) - 12 goals
Biggest home winPaysandu 5-0 Rio Negro (March 12, 1980)
Botafogo-SP 5-0 Goiânia (April 6, 1980)
Botafogo-SP 6-1 Paysandu (April 20, 1980)
Biggest away winBotafogo-BA 0-7 Americano (March 15, 1980)
Highest scoringAmérica-SP 6-2 Figueirense (March 15, 1980)
1972
1981

The 1980 Campeonato Brasileiro Série B, officially, the Taça de Prata 1980, was the 3rd edition of the Campeonato Brasileiro Série B. The championship was performed by 64 clubs, divided into 8 groups of 8 teams each, in which the first-placed team of each group proceeded to a playoff in which the winners would be promoted to the Second phase of the Copa Brasil of the same year. The losers would proceed to the second phase of the Taça de Prata, in which 20 teams (the losers of the promotion playoff, and the second and third-placed teams in each group)were divided into four groups of five teams. The winner of each group qualified to the semifinals, disputed in a knockout tournament format, in which the winners were promoted to the Taça de Ouro of the following year.

First phase

Group A

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Pará Paysandu 11 7 4 3 0 12 4 +8
2 Maranhão Sampaio Corrêa 9 7 3 3 1 14 10 +4
3 Pará Tuna Luso 8 7 3 2 2 13 9 +4
4 Piauí River 8 7 2 4 1 6 3 +3
5 Maranhão Moto Club 7 7 1 5 1 10 10 0
6 Amazonas (Brazilian state) Rio Negro 5 7 2 1 4 8 16 -8
7 Piauí Piauí 4 7 2 0 5 8 13 -5
8 Amazonas (Brazilian state) Fast 4 7 0 4 3 6 12 -6

Group B

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Rio de Janeiro (state) Americano 11 7 5 1 1 20 7 +13
2 Alagoas CSA 10 7 5 0 2 13 7 +6
3 Rio de Janeiro (state) Bonsucesso 10 7 4 2 1 10 6 +4
4 Alagoas ASA 8 7 3 2 2 6 6 0
5 Bahia Itabuna 7 7 3 1 3 9 9 0
6 Sergipe Confiança 4 7 1 2 4 4 9 -5
7 Sergipe Sergipe 3 7 1 1 5 8 15 -7
8 Bahia Botafogo-BA 3 7 1 1 5 6 17 -11

Group C

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Pernambuco Sport 12 7 5 2 0 9 1 +8
2 Ceará Fortaleza 9 7 4 1 2 12 7 +5
3 Rio Grande do Norte ABC 7 7 3 1 3 7 5 +2
4 Paraíba Campinense 7 7 1 5 1 4 4 0
5 Pernambuco Central 6 7 1 4 2 3 3 0
6 Bahia Leônico 6 7 1 4 2 3 6 -3
7 Rio Grande do Norte Baraúnas 5 7 2 1 4 6 13 -7
8 Paraíba Treze 4 7 0 4 3 5 10 -5

Group D

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Goiás Anapolina 10 7 4 2 1 11 5 +6
2 Goiás Itumbiara 10 7 5 0 2 11 6 +5
3 Minas Gerais Uberaba 10 7 4 2 1 10 7 +3
4 Federal District (Brazil) Brasília 8 7 4 0 3 12 8 +4
5 Mato Grosso Operário-MT 7 7 2 3 2 6 6 0
6 Minas Gerais Villa Nova 5 7 1 3 3 4 5 -1
7 Mato Grosso União Rondonópolis 5 7 2 1 4 6 12 -6
8 Federal District (Brazil) Guará 1 7 0 1 6 3 14 -11

Group E

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Minas Gerais Uberlândia 9 7 4 1 2 8 5 +3
2 Mato Grosso do Sul Comercial-MS 8 7 3 2 2 8 6 +2
3 Minas Gerais América-MG 8 7 3 2 2 7 6 +1
4 Goiás Goiânia 8 7 2 4 1 4 3 +1
5 Minas Gerais Caldense 7 7 3 1 3 8 4 +4
6 Espírito Santo Vitória 6 7 2 2 3 6 8 -2
7 Goiás Goiás 6 7 1 4 2 5 6 -1
8 Espírito Santo Rio Branco-ES 4 7 1 2 4 5 13 -8

Group F

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 Rio de Janeiro (state) Bangu 11 7 5 1 1 13 5 +8
2 São Paulo (state) Ferroviária 9 7 4 1 2 11 7 +4
3 São Paulo (state) Botafogo-SP 7 7 3 1 3 11 7 +4
4 São Paulo (state) Internacional de Limeira 7 7 3 1 3 8 6 +2
5 São Paulo (state) Noroeste 7 7 3 1 3 5 8 -3
6 Rio de Janeiro (state) Goytacaz 6 7 2 2 3 4 9 -5
7 Rio de Janeiro (state) Campo Grande 5 7 2 1 4 10 11 -1
8 Rio de Janeiro (state) Serrano-RJ 4 7 1 2 4 4 13 -9

Group G

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 São Paulo (state) América-SP 13 7 6 1 0 23 9 +14
2 Rio Grande do Sul Caxias 10 7 3 4 0 8 5 +3
3 Paraná (state) Grêmio Maringá 8 7 3 2 2 12 7 +5
4 Santa Catarina (state) Figueirense 7 7 3 1 3 13 12 +1
5 São Paulo (state) XV de Piracicaba 6 7 2 2 3 11 11 0
6 Rio Grande do Sul Novo Hamburgo 5 7 2 1 4 5 13 -8
7 Paraná (state) Operário-PR 4 7 2 0 5 6 14 -8
8 Santa Catarina (state) Avaí 3 7 1 1 5 7 14 -7

Group H

Pos. Team Pt Pld W D L GF GA GD
1 São Paulo (state) Juventus 11 7 5 1 1 12 6 +6
2 São Paulo (state) Comercial-SP 11 7 4 3 0 10 2 +8
3 Paraná (state) Londrina 9 7 4 1 2 10 8 +2
4 Paraná (state) Atlético-PR 9 7 2 5 0 5 3 +2
5 Rio Grande do Sul Juventude 6 7 2 2 3 8 9 -1
6 Rio Grande do Sul Brasil de Pelotas 5 7 0 5 2 7 9 -2
7 Santa Catarina (state) Criciúma 4 7 1 2 4 6 10 -4
8 Santa Catarina (state) Chapecoense 1 7 0 1 6 2 13 -11

Promotion play-off

Team 1 Agg. Team 2 1st leg 2nd leg
Paysandu 2-3 Americano 2-1 0-2
Juventus 2-2 América-SP[1] 2-0 0-2
Anapolina 1-4 Sport 1-1 0-3
Uberlândia 2-4 Bangu 2-0 0-4

Second phase

Group I

P
Team
Pts
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Promotion or relegation
1. Botafogo-SP 7 4 3 1 0 18 5 +13 Qualified to Semifinals
2. Fortaleza 5 4 1 3 0 5 3 +2
3. Goiânia 3 4 1 1 2 3 7 -4
4. Paysandu 3 4 1 1 2 3 9 -6
5. Itumbiara 2 4 1 0 3 5 11 -6

Group J

P
Team
Pts
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Promotion or relegation
1. Londrina 8 4 4 0 0 8 2 +6 Qualified to Semifinals
2. Grêmio Maringá 6 4 3 0 1 10 4 +6
3. Sampaio Corrêa 3 4 1 1 2 6 8 -2
4. Anapolina 2 4 0 2 2 4 9 -5
5. Bonsucesso 1 4 0 1 3 4 9 -5

Group K

P
Team
Pts
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Promotion or relegation
1. CSA 6 4 2 2 0 5 3 +2 Qualified to Semifinals
2. Caxias 5 4 2 1 1 4 3 +1
3. Comercial-SP 4 4 2 0 2 7 5 +2
4. Tuna Luso 3 4 1 1 2 2 4 -2
5. Uberlândia 2 4 1 0 3 3 6 -3

Group L

P
Team
Pts
Pld
W
D
L
GF
GA
GD
Promotion or relegation
1. Ferroviária 7 4 3 1 0 7 1 +6 Qualified to Semifinals
2. Uberaba 5 4 2 1 1 6 3 +3
3. ABC 5 4 2 1 1 9 10 -1
4. Juventus 2 4 0 2 2 4 6 -2
5. América-MG 1 4 0 1 3 4 10 -6

Semifinals

Team 1 Agg. Team 2 1st leg 2nd leg
Botafogo-SP 1-3 Londrina 1-2 0-1
CSA 2-0 Ferroviária 1-0 1-0

Finals

First leg

CSA Alagoas1 – 1Paraná (state) Londrina
Dentinho Goal 76' Paulinho Goal 85'
Attendance: 25,659
Referee: São Paulo (state) Oscar Scolfaro

Second leg

Londrina Paraná (state)4 – 0Alagoas CSA
Zé Antônio Goal 29'
Lívio Goal 33'
Paulinho Goal 80', Goal 84'
Attendance: 36,489

References

  1. ^ América-SP qualified due to having a better performance in the first phase.

Sources