This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Inbreeding avoidance in rhesus macaques: Whose choice? - Manson - 1993 - American Journal of Physical Anthropology - Wiley Online Library

By continuing to browse this site you agree to us using cookies as described in About Cookies

Remove maintenance message
American Journal of Physical Anthropology Explore this journal >
Article

Inbreeding avoidance in rhesus macaques: Whose choice?

Authors

  • Dr. Joseph H. Manson,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1382
    • Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1382
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Susan E. Perry

    1. Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1382
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Whether nonhuman primates avoid copulating with close kin living in their social group is controversial. If sexual aversion to relatives occurs, it should be stronger in females than in males because of females' greater investment in each offspring and hence greater costs resulting from less viable offspring. Data presented here show that adult male rhesus macaques breeding in their natal groups at Cayo Santiago experienced high copulatory success, but copulated less with females of their own matrilineages than with females of other matrilineages. Adult females were never observed to copulate with males of their own matrilineage during their fertile periods. Although natal males sometimes courted their relatives, examination of two measures of female mate choice showed that females chose unrelated natal males over male kin. Female aversion to male kin was specific to the sexual context; during the birth season, females did not discriminate against their male relatives in distributing grooming. Evolved inbreeding avoidance mechanisms probably produce different outcomes at Cayo Santiago than in wild rhesus macaque populations. Gender differences in sexual aversion to relatives may be partly responsible for differences between studies in reported frequency of copulations by related pairs. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Continue reading full article

Ancillary

Article Information

DOI

10.1002/ajpa.1330900307

Format Available

Full text: PDF

Copyright © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company

Request Permissions

Keywords

  • Mate Choice;
  • Cayo Santiago

Publication History

  • Issue online: 27 April 2005
  • Version of record online: 27 April 2005
  • Manuscript Accepted: 26 June 1992
  • Manuscript Received: 10 October 1991

Related content

Articles related to the one you are viewing

Citing Literature

  • Number of times cited: 27
  1. 1Carol M. Berman, Primate Kinship: Contributions from Cayo Santiago, American Journal of Primatology, 2016, 78, 1, 63Wiley Online Library
  2. 2Erica M. Tennenhouse, M. Hauber, Inbreeding Avoidance in Male Primates: A Response to Female Mate Choice?, Ethology, 2014, 120, 2, 111Wiley Online Library
  3. 3Maria V. Rakhovskaya, Correlates of Male Consortship Rate in Free-Ranging Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), International Journal of Primatology, 2013, 34, 4, 662CrossRef
  4. 4Jorg J. M. Massen, Elisabeth H. M. Sterck, Stability and Durability of Intra- and Intersex Social Bonds of Captive Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), International Journal of Primatology, 2013, 34, 4, 770CrossRef
  5. 5H. A. MacCormick, D. R. MacNulty, A. L. Bosacker, C. Lehman, A. Bailey, D. Anthony Collins, C. Packer, Male and female aggression: lessons from sex, rank, age, and injury in olive baboons, Behavioral Ecology, 2012, 23, 3, 684CrossRef
  6. 6Jorg J. M. Massen, Anne M. Overduin-de Vries, Annemiek J. M. de Vos-Rouweler, Berry M. Spruijt, Gaby G. M. Doxiadis, Elisabeth H. M. Sterck, Male Mating Tactics in Captive Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta): The Influence of Dominance, Markets, and Relationship Quality, International Journal of Primatology, 2012, 33, 1, 73CrossRef
  7. 7Constance Dubuc, Kelly D. Hughes, Julie Cascio, Laurie R. Santos, Social tolerance in a despotic primate: Co-feeding between consortship partners in rhesus macaques, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2012, 148, 1, 73Wiley Online Library
  8. 8Constance Dubuc, Laura Muniz, Michael Heistermann, Antje Engelhardt, Anja Widdig, Testing the priority-of-access model in a seasonally breeding primate species, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011, 65, 8, 1615CrossRef
  9. 9Emma Nelson, Martin Voracek, Heritability of digit ratio (2D:4D) in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), Primates, 2010, 51, 1, 1CrossRef
  10. 10Trevor E. Pitcher, F. Helen Rodd, Locke Rowe, Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), Genetica, 2008, 134, 1, 137CrossRef
  11. 11LARA MODOLO, ROBERT D. MARTIN, CAREL P. VAN SCHAIK, MARIA A. VAN NOORDWIJK, MICHAEL KRÜTZEN, When dispersal fails: unexpected genetic separation in Gibraltar macaques (Macaca sylvanus), Molecular Ecology, 2008, 17, 18, 4027Wiley Online Library
  12. 12Joanna M. Setchell, E. Jean Wickings, Mate Choice in Male Mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx), Ethology, 2006, 112, 1, 91Wiley Online Library
  13. 13John Berard, A four-year study of the association between male dominance rank, residency status, and reproductive activity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), Primates, 1999, 40, 1, 159CrossRef
  14. 14CAROL M. BERMAN, ELLEN KAPSALIS, Development of kin bias among rhesus monkeys: maternal transmission or individual learning?, Animal Behaviour, 1999, 58, 4, 883CrossRef
  15. 15Joseph Soltis, Fusako Mitsunaga, Keiko Shimizu, Yoshimi Yanagihara, Masumi Nozaki, Female mating strategy in an enclosed group of Japanese macaques, American Journal of Primatology, 1999, 47, 4, 263Wiley Online Library
  16. 16P. S. Rodman, Whither Primatology? The Place of Primates in Contemporary Anthropology, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1999, 28, 1, 311CrossRef
  17. 17Joseph H. Manson, Evolved psychology in a novel environment, Human Nature, 1998, 9, 2, 97CrossRef
  18. 18CAROL M BERMAN, K.L.R RASMUSSEN, STEPHEN J SUOMI, Group size, infant development and social networks in free-ranging rhesus monkeys, Animal Behaviour, 1997, 53, 2, 405CrossRef
  19. 19Laura Smale, Scott Nunes, Kay E. Holekamp, , 1997, 26, 181CrossRef
  20. 20Doris Zumpe, Richard P. Michael, Social factors modulate the effects of hormones on the sexual and aggressive behavior of macaques, American Journal of Primatology, 1996, 38, 3, 233Wiley Online Library

View all 27 citations

Close article support pane