This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Wikidata:Diskusjon - Wikidata

Wikidata:Diskusjon

From Wikidata Jump to navigation Jump to search Wikidata-diskusjon Her kan vi diskutere Wikidata på norsk (bokmål, riksmål, nynorsk og høgnorsk). Start en/ein ny diskusjon Edit On this page, old discussions are archived after 90 days. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Diskusjon/Arkiv/2020. SpBot [[
en:Help:Archiving a talk page|archives]] all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.

Contents

Sletting[edit]

Kom til å opprette en dublett. Kan noen kyndige slette Q70972808 og beholde Q4560629? Hilsen GAD (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Jeg flettet sidene. Einar Myre (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Feedback wanted on Desktop Improvements project[edit]

Please help translate to your language

Hello. The Readers Web team at the WMF will work on some improvements to the desktop interface over the next couple of years. The goal is to increase usability without removing any functionality. We have been inspired by changes made by volunteers, but that currently only exist as local gadgets and user scripts, prototypes, and volunteer-led skins. We would like to begin the process of bringing some of these changes into the default experience on all Wikimedia projects.

We are currently in the research stage of this project and are looking for ideas for improvements, as well as feedback on our current ideas and mockups. So far, we have performed interviews with community members at Wikimania. We have gathered lists of previous volunteer and WMF work in this area. We are examining possible technical approaches for such changes.

We would like individual feedback on the following:

  • Identifying focus areas for the project we have not yet discovered
  • Expanding the list of existing gadgets and user scripts that are related to providing a better desktop experience. If you can think of some of these from your wiki, please let us know
  • Feedback on the ideas and mockups we have collected so far

We would also like to gather a list of wikis that would be interested in being test wikis for this project - these wikis would be the first to receive the updates once we’re ready to start building.

When giving feedback, please consider the following goals of the project:

  • Make it easier for readers to focus on the content
  • Provide easier access to everyday actions (e.g. search, language switching, editing)
  • Put things in logical and useful places
  • Increase consistency in the interface with other platforms - mobile web and the apps
  • Eliminate clutter
  • Plan for future growth

As well as the following constraints:

  • Not touching the content - no work will be done in terms of styling templates or to the structure of page contents themselves
  • Not removing any functionality - things might move around, but all navigational items and other functionality currently available by default will remain
  • No drastic changes to the layout - we're taking an evolutionary approach to the changes and want the site to continue feeling familiar to readers and editors

Please give all feedback (in any language) at mw:Talk:Reading/Web/Desktop Improvements

After this round of feedback, we plan on building a prototype of suggested changes based on the feedback we receive. You’ll hear from us again asking for feedback on this prototype.

Thank you! Quiddity (WMF) (talk)

06:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Ref-er fra Store norske leksikon[edit]

På no-WP vises Store norske leksikon i mange ref-er bare med Q-verdien (Q30172599). Eksempel, se: Hermann Starheimsæter. Årsaken er at denne verdien i mange tilfeller er registrert på WD, og at Q30172599 er en omdirigeringsside på WD - uten etiketter... Såvidt jeg skjønner bør det kjøres en bot på WD slik at Q30172599 erstattes av den egentlige siden Q746368? Noen som klarer å løse problemet? Kimsaka (talk) 10:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Det er ting som ofte blir løst av en eksisterende bot. Som det også har blitt i dette tilfellet [1]. - Premeditated (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Movement Learning and Leadership Development Project[edit]

Hello

The Wikimedia Foundation’s Community Development team is seeking to learn more about the way volunteers learn and develop into the many different roles that exist in the movement. Our goal is to build a movement informed framework that provides shared clarity and outlines accessible pathways on how to grow and develop skills within the movement. To this end, we are looking to speak with you, our community to learn about your journey as a Wikimedia volunteer. Whether you joined yesterday or have been here from the very start, we want to hear about the many ways volunteers join and contribute to our movement.

To learn more about the project, please visit the Meta page. If you are interested in participating in the project, please complete this simple Google form. Although we may not be able to speak to everyone who expresses interest, we encourage you to complete this short form if you are interested in participating!

-- LMiranda (WMF) (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Beskjeftigelse[edit]

@Hebue: @Asav: @Jeblad: @Erik den yngre: @Efloean: @Hebue, kan de engelske betegnelsene "vaskes" imot noen andre SSB dataer?, hva med historiske data? Jeg vet at ft1801 har en database på "beskjeftigelse" .Noen som vet forskjellen påp yrke og beskjeftigelse? Mvh Pmt (talk) 14:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

@Pmt: Det tekniske kan jeg ikke svare på. Betegnelsen "beskjeftigelse" ble vel i sin tid valgt til erstatning for "yrke", fordi det ble fylt på med stadig flere data i Wikidata som ikke passet med hva de fleste av oss forstår som et yrke. Dels har det handlet om hva som passer med norske forhold (eksempel: er politiker et yrke? — jeg vil av historisk-kulturelle grunner mene at det ikke er det), dels har det handlet om en utglidning i hva noen velger å mate Wikidata med (eksempel: er det å ha en blogg eller å ha skrevet en selvbiografi nok til å listes som blogger eller selvbiograf?). Det har også vært en viss sammenblanding av yrker og stillingstitler. Efloean (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
@Efloean: Ja det er jo helt slutt å bruke yrke på wikidata som du sier "alt" havner under beskjeftigelse og derfor tror jeg at det kunne være ok å ha en "norsk" yrkesbetegnelse der vi bruker SSB sine betegnelser. Når det gjelder verv og stilling så liker jeg å forholde meg til utnevnt av kongen i statsråd for nordmenn. Mvh Pmt (talk) 07:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Det er nok ikke veldig mye avvik mellom ISCO-08 og STYRK-08, men noen avvik kan forventes. 46.46.207.162
@46.46.207.162 Men det vil vel være mest korrekt å bruke ISCO-08 slik at det blir internasjonal dekning. Mvh Pmt (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "[www.wikidata.org]" Categories:

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

    Views

    More

      Navigation

      Tools

      In Wikipedia

        Add links

        In other projects