This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Yin Zhu | Agriculture Department of Hubei Province

Yin Zhu Agriculture Department of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China · Agriculture Department of Hubei Province

8.83 · MD About 424 Research items 35,703 Reads 18 Citations Introduction From gravitational redshift and law of conservation of energy, I got equations, ∆g=√(fG/μ_0 ) B and ∆g=√(fGε_0 ) E, for the interaction between gravitational and magnetic/electric field. The variation of gravitational acceleration ∆g is determined with the gravitational redshift parameter ƒ and the magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E; G, μ_0 and ε_0 are gravitational, magnetic and electric constant. It should mean that we shall can manipulate the gravitational field as the Faraday’s law of induction did the electromagnetic one. This work was published in: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379718314128. Now, I very hope the equations can be confirmed experimentally. Skills and Expertise Quantum Mechanics Artificial Intelligence Astronomy & Astrophysics Electromagnetics General Relativity Quantum Field Theory Theoretical Physics Special and General Relativity Mathematical Physics Gravitational Physics Quantum Physics Field Theory Fundamental Physics Theoretical High Energy Physics Theoretical Astrophysics Electromagnetic Fields Physical Cosmology Galaxy Quantum Entanglement Classical Mechanics Electrodynamics Quantum Gravity Spacecraft Quantum Cosmology Planets String Theory Solar System Sun Modern Physics Foundations of Physics Gravity Philosophy of Physics Newtonian Mechanics Relativity History Of Physics Space Time Mathematical Concepts Network Followers Following Projects Projects (6) To use gravitational field Project Observation of speed of gravity Project Observation of the neutralization of gravitational field Project
Research Research Items (424) The Principle of Physics and Mathematics Research File available
  • Jun 2015
The invariance of the speed of light is taken as the fundamental of modern physics. But, in recent, the faster-than-light was observed. It requires that the fundamental of the whole physics be reassessed. In this paper, in the mathematics, the definitions in Euclidean Elements are stressed. It is pointed out that these definitions are only the concepts. They are not related to a certain real object or body. In physics, the Newtonian framework is stressed. It is pointed out that, in Newtonian theory, the abstract concepts are used as the definitions in Euclidean Elements. For example, the Sun is treated just as a point particle. And the initial law only is an abstracted concept which cannot be checked with experiment while it can be understood by our brain. According to the Euclidean Elements and Newtonian theory, some of the mathematical and physical concepts in modern physics are discussed. For example, it is pointed out that the extra dimension in modern physics is not a mathematical concept of Euclidean geometry as it is related to a real pillar. It is stressed that high and fractional coordinate systems are used to describe the object that can be described with the Cartesian one. And, the equations of physics in different coordinate systems and the transformation of the equations among different coordinate systems are discussed. To detect gravitational wave with artificial Hill sphere Experiment Findings File available
  • Dec 2016
Gravitational-magnetic-electric Field Interaction Article Full-text available
  • Aug 2018
From gravitational redshift/blueshift and the law of conservation of energy, we obtained equations, ∆g=√(fG/μ_0 ) B and ∆g=√(fGε_0 ) E, for the interaction between gravitational and magnetic/electric field. The variation of gravitational acceleration ∆g is determined with the gravitational redshift parameter ƒ and the magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E; G, μ_0 and ε_0 are gravitational, magnetic and electric constant. The equations show that the variation of the gravitational field could be measured. And, we found that, the energy density of the magnetic field is close to that of the gravitational one. It also indicates that a strong magnetic field could make the variation of the energy of gravitational field measurable. The equations should mean that not only we have a new way to understand gravity, but also we shall can manipulate the gravitational field as we did the electromagnetic one. Observation of the Direction and Neutralization of Gravitational Field Research File available
  • Jul 2015
This observation begins from the famous old problem: Why the orbit of the Moon around the Earth is stable under the condition that the attractive force of the Sun on the Moon is almost 2.5 times that of the Earth? The orbit of the Moon around the Earth is the most fundamental to the theory of gravity. It need be understood by high school student. But, till now, it has not been right explained. Here, from the Hill sphere, we directly showed that the gravitational field of the Moon is trapped or limited in the Hill radius by the Earth. So, the Sun cannot attract the Moon with the force F=G Mm/R^2 . We concluded that, the trapped gravitational field means that it is neutralized as the interacted electric fields. We emphasized that, an actual gravitational field is always interacting with other ones. There is an energy exchange between the interacting fields and the fields are varied by the energy flux. So, the gravitational field only can be right explained and understood with the interacted and varied fields. Therefore, we need new theory for gravity. And, for there is no positive and negative gravitational field and to explain the structure of the disc stellar system, we hypothesized that, the gravitational field is analogous to the magnetic field. Observations show that it is better than the hypothesis that the gravitational field is analogous to the electric field. We concluded that an artificial Hill sphere could be constructed. This observation should be a fundamental to develop the new theory of gravity. Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory of relativity (V2) Preprint File available
  • Jul 2018
1) All of the conclusions are copied from or based on the arguments and discussions in the researchgate.net. Sometimes, the arguments are very intense and sharp. Till now, these conclusions seem solidly standing. 2) The discussed problems are easily understood. Only simple mathematics is used. From the literatures, it is clearly shown that Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. It just is a faked story that Einstein independently presented all the conclusions of the theory of relativity. 3) The conclusions are radically violent. It is certainly declared that Einstein's theory of relativity is only pseudoscience and the pseudoscience is produced from the anti-ethics: Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. But, now, all of the results in the theory of relativity are ascribed to Einstein. 4) General readers may not believe the conclusions. But, as you know that all of Einstein's mathematics derivations in the theory of relativity are faked, you shall know what it means. 5) The arguments in the researchgate.net showed that, at least, no relativist can disprove the conclusions. And, some of the rational relativists have to agree some of these conclusions. But, most of the relativists only can select silent. 6) Maybe, relativists will close their eyes on the conclusions to continue the declaration that the theory of relativity is a great theory as they did in the past. But, now, it is the internet time. The conclusions cannot be concealed and shielded as did before. Now, they can be generally and quickly spread and transformed. Relativists shall lose their public credibility quickly if they could not have a valid response. 7) We clearly know, it is risk to criticize Einstein. But, we believe, all scientists, including relativists, want to know scientific truth. And, we believe, we have the clear and simple arguments. Therefore, we hope, some of the mainstream physicists should accept the conclusions. 8) It is important, Einstein's theory affected the whole system of modern physics. The modern physics was misled badly by Einstein's theory. The Standard Model and Theory for Everything are questioned. Question - Is It Time Now to Discard Einstein’s Theories of Relativity Like Ptolemy’s Epicycles? Yin Zhu
  • May 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Abdul Malek, I think you are right. Einstein’s theory of relativity just is a faked story. First, the key problem of the theory of relativity is unethical. Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. As you input “Einstein plagiarism” into the bing.com, you can get more than 100,000 results to show that Einstein is a plagiarist. Second, the scientific problem is that, Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime is not true. Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime was crucially disproven with the high energy accelerator/collider. Third, the crucial problem is that Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime has not been and cannot be used to invent any new production. If you are interesting, you are welcome to see: [www.researchgate.net] … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck,If you could excute the authority of the RG, I should stop my comment. My most important work is first posted on RG and RG sent it to many experts although now it was published in a normal journal. So, I very thank the founders of RG. I do not hope I have trouble with RG or I should make trouble to RG. So, I shall end any comment and reply here. This is my last comment here. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, I cannot know what you have said. But, I am certain what you said has nothing to do with my cited work and my comments. You said: “The constant "c" can have any value in mathematics.” My original sentence is: “In mathematics (not in physics), the speed of light in the Lorentz transformation can be infinite large.” It clearly pointed out that Einstein’s Lorentz transformation is wrong in mathematics and is invalid in physics. You said “Your second sentence is correct.” What do you want to tell the readers? Best regards. Zhu … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, You talked about the “gamma factor with in it the term (v/c)2” and the limit of the speed of light. Then, do you know the exact meaning of the “gamma factor with in it the term (v/c)2”. In the link I cited to you, it was shown that, the “gamma factor with in it the term (v/c)2” makes the speed of light infinite large. You do not care my evidence, how could we continue this discussion? I sentence again: the Lorentz transformation cannot be derived from the invariance of the speed of light because it first was derived from the condition that the speed of light is variable. In mathematics (not in physics), the speed of light in the Lorentz transformation can be infinite large. Best regards. Zhu … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer GD: because the time of your reply is the night in my location, so I did not reply once. Your original words is: “the Lorentz Transforms could be derived from Maxwell's Equations” The Einstein’s words you cited is: "It is known that Maxwell’s electrodynamics - as usually understood at the present time - when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries which do not appear to be inherent in the phenomena." And "... as has already been shown to the first order of small quantities, the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good. We will raise this conjecture (the purport of which will hereafter be called the “Principle of Relativity”) to the status of a postulate, and also introduce another postulate, which is only apparently irreconcilable with the former, namely, that light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body. These two postulates suffice for the attainment of a simple and consistent theory of the electrodynamics of moving bodies based on Maxwell’s theory for stationary bodies." How could you from Einstein’s words obtain the conclusion: “the Lorentz Transforms could be derived from Maxwell's Equations”? Which well trained relativists should think you are right? I tell you that the standard express is: From the principle of relativity and the invariance of speed of light, Einstein derived the lorenta transformation. So, I suggest again: do more homework for your discussion. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, You said: “A transformation that is mathematically defined can't lose its mathematical validity. These transformations are a mathematical set that have as an assumption that the speed of light is constant in one condition of one inertial reference frame and then describe how you can define any other IRF such that then there the speed of light seems to be constant also.” I told you that “The Lorentz transformation is first derived from the condition that the speed of light is varied. But, Einstein derived it from the condition of the invariance of the speed of light.” Do you think The Lorentz transformation is valid for which one of the conditions, the variance of the speed of light or the invariance of the speed of light? Why? … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, What is the validity of SRT? In physics, the validity need be confirmed experimentally. Therefore, what is the crucial experiment for Einstein’s relative space time? I think, the high speed accelerator is the crucial experiment. Why? The particles in the accelerator is that that the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light. The condition is the most stable, accurate and repeatable. But, under the condition the relative space and time are not true. And, till now, no relativist had claimed that an accelerator need be designed according to SRT. As the relative spacetime is not true in the accelerator, why relativists claimed it observed in other place? This is that relativists made fake declarations. It was analyzed in detailed in the references I cited in the previous comments. Best regards. Zhu You had many words on mathematics. If you should know the problem of mathematics in Einstein's theory of relativity, please see: Working Paper Contradiction between invariance of speed of light and Loren...  … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, The Lorentz transformation is first derived from the condition that the speed of light is varied. But, Einstein derived it from the condition of the invariance of the speed of light. Of course, one of the derivations is wrong. Then, who is wrong? However, I believe the previous derivation is right. How can Einstein get the same conclusion from conversely condition? The only way is to fake the mathematics derivation. Please see: [www.researchgate.net] So, this is the story: Einstein “borrowed” others’ conclusion. With faked derivation, Einstein obtained the conclusion from converse condition. Then, what is you conclusion about Einstein and the Lorentz transformation? My conclusion is: 1) Einstein plagiarized the Lorentz transformation. 2) Einstein faked the mathematic derivation. 3) The Lorentz transformation is invalid in mathematics and physics. It cannot be valid in the converse conditions. Best regards. Zhu … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr.George Dishman, Your these words: “Many people at that time had similar approaches but the original contribution was to show that the Lorentz Transforms could be derived from Maxwell's Equations whereas others were proposing them merely as ad hoc solutions. Nobody else had done that prior to his 1905 publication.” Show that you knew little about Einstein and his theory of relativity. It is certain, in Einstein’s 1905 publication, the Lorentz Transforms is not derived from Maxwell's Equations. And, in any of Einstein’s works, I have not read that the Lorentz Transforms is derived from Maxwell's Equations Although I did read many of his works. Should you tell me in his which work it was done so? So, I think, you have to do more homework for the discussion. You said, “It (SR and GR) passes all observational tests, that is the only arbiter of truth in science.” I told you that “But, in the past more than 100 years, relativists claimed again and again, Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime was proven with experiments. While, in internet, Einstein is questioned by many people in his original and in his mistakes of his relative and curved spacetime.” You only repeated that declared by relativists. … 
Question - Is Any Effective Refutation of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity Possible? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Thierry De Mees, The effect of oblateness of the Sun on the orbit around the Sun is all-around, including the precession, axis, velocity of the planets and the direction of the velocity, am so on. The effect is larger as the distance to the planet is less. Best regards. Zhu … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, Science need be questioned, doubted and denied. As you said: “Any attempt to deny SR should be blocked”, it means that you regard that SR is not science. And, no one has the authority to block other denying SR. Where is your authority from?  … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, I cannot understand your “topic”. You said: “Any attempt to deny SR should be blocked, as not scientifically credible, as well as political or conspiracy theories.” But, you claimed several times that I am off-topic. Why? I clearly show that denying SR is credible. As you want to arrive at “Any attempt to deny SR should be blocked”, you have to give the absolute evidence that SR cannot be questioned. But, we know, no science subject cannot be questioned and denied. If SR cannot be denied, it is not science. So, I tell you again, what you are doing is anti-science. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer GD: Thank you very much for your reply. You have to know that there three problems for Einstein and his theory of relativity. First, Einstein did have no original work in his theory of relativity. But, in the past time, all of the equations and conclusions in the theory of relativity were declared to be presented independently by Einstein. So, many stories were faked for Einstein and his theory of relativity. So, the key problem of the theory of relativity is unethical. Second, in a widespread book “Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius”, it was shown that, Einstein made 23 mistakes in mathematics, almost including all of the main conclusions in his theory of relativity. But, from the wrong derivations, he just obtained the current (in that time) conclusions. Logically, no one can always obtain right conclusions from wrong derivations. So, this cannot be a “Failings of Genius”. Now, it was shown that some of the current (in that time) conclusions are wrong. Therefore, we only can conclude that Einstein faked his mathematics derivations and conclusions. Third, Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime is not true. Please see: [www.researchgate.net] [www.researchgate.net] So, the story of Einstein’s theory of relativity is: from the faked mathematics derivation, Einstein obtained the conclusions presented by other people. And it was declared that these conclusions are presented by Einstein. Factually, in science, Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime are not true. But, in the past more than 100 years, relativists claimed again and again, Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime was proven with experiments. While, in internet, Einstein is questioned by many people in his original and in his mistakes of his relative and curved spacetime. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck:If we should discuss a scientific problem, we need use scientific standard. Do not misguide the discussion with unscientific factors. If you think honestly that Einstein is the greatest physicist, you need tell the readers that, in his theory of relativity, which one of the conclusions is originally presented by Einstein himself. If no one of the conclusions is originally presented by Einstein himself, therefore, some people call him the plagiarizer is suitable. Should you willingly argue for a plagiarizer? So, what you have to do is clarify whether or not Einstein plagiarized in science. If you could do so, you should stand. And, no one should believe one of my words again. Conversely, if you could not, all of your effort to support Einstein is in vain. We believe, all of the readers in RG are well trained and many of them are professorial. They can well assess what we said. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, There are two different opinions for Einstein with his theory of relativity. The mainstream social physicists claimed that Einstein with his theory of relativity is the greatest. The doubt ant question about him was and is being certainly blocked in their journals and forums. But, there are many people know that Einstein just is a plagiarizer and his theory of relativity is simply wrong. So, as you input “Einstein plagiarism” in bing.com (I cannot use google), you can get more than 100,000 results. The mainstream physicists or relativists have to be faced with these facts. They have no the ability to prove that Einstein’s theory of relativity is scientifically right. So, the only way for them supporting Einstein with his theory of relativity is to make these voices vanished. However, now, it is the internet time. Relativists cannot let all of the voices vanished although they tried very big effort. So, there do be more than 100,000 results to show that Einstein just is a plagiarizer. So, Dr. Ed Gerck, I am certain, you shall fail to block the voice to show the facts that Einstein is a plagiarizer and Einstein faked his mathematics derivation in his theory of relativity and no relativist can scientifically show that the theory of relativity is not a faked story. … 
Question - Is Any Effective Refutation of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity Possible? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. John Hodge, and all friends, As you talk about Einstein’s general relativity, you have to know these basic facts: 1.It is Gunnar Nordström who first presented to describe gravity with curved space. Einstein did not have original work in the theory of relativity. 2.Einstein’s curved spacetime has not been and cannot be used to design an orbit of a real artificial spacecraft/satellite. Relativists may argue that it can. But, they cannot argue that the curved spacetime has been used to design an orbit. 3.In fact, it cannot. To use the Einstein’s field theory designing an orbit, the Einstein gravitational time dilation must be used. But, the Hafele-keating experiment is incredible for two reasons: First, the time on the level of nanosecond cannot be measured in a vibrating and shocking plane. Second, the Newtonian gravitational force has an effect on the atoms in an atomic clock. This effect is much larger than Einstein gravitational time dilation. But, it has never been considered in the Hafele-keating experiments. 4. An orbit of a planet is usually perturbed by many factors. It is described with the Lagrange’ planetary equation which express Newtonian gravitational force and other force. The curved spacetime cannot be expressed with the Lagrange’ planetary equation. 5.The precession of perihelion of Mercury is perturbed by the oblateness of the Sun. It has never been mentioned in the textbook of a general relativity. This perturbation cannot be explained by Einstein’s general relativity. It only can be explained with Newtonian theory of gravity. So, 1. it is only a faked story that Einstein originated GR. 2. In fact, GR is never been a theory of gravity. Any theory of gravity must can be used to study the orbit. But, GR cannot. 3. The declaration that GR has been well experimentally tested only is a cheat. 4. The mathematics in GR is simply wrong. In a widespread book “Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius”, it was shown that, Einstein made 23 mistakes in mathematics, almost including all of the main conclusions in his theory of relativity. But, from the wrong derivations, he just obtained the current (in that time) conclusions. Logically, no one can always obtain right conclusions from wrong derivations. So, this cannot be a “Failings of Genius”. Now, it was shown that some of the current (in that time) conclusions are wrong. Therefore, we only can conclude that Einstein faked his mathematics derivations and conclusions. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear friends, I very agree with Dr. Eric Baird: One of ResearchGate's big selling points is that it's "the alternative" to existing moderated forums. While people can be banned for misbehaviour (not the case on Usenet) the openness of its content makes it a more professional environment than moderated forums such as AOL's, which (last time I looked) tended to be not much more than glorified homework discussion groups. If RG blocks critical discussion of SR and GR – arguably two of the biggest theories in C20th physics – then it becomes a dumbed down homework forum, with perhaps some engineering and technical Q&A. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear friends, No one has the authority to claim that a theory of physics is right and denying it is anti-science. Science need doubt and question. The development of science showed that many generally accepted theories were given up. In a developing theory, the frontier of this theory is usually made up of hypotheses and conjectures. And, the development of science is to prove and disprove these hypotheses and conjectures. So, in the frontier, many of the hypotheses or accepted “theories” were given up. In physics, after the Michelson-Morey experiment, the Ether Theory that is thought a fundamental theory was given up. In another hand, if there is a taboo against doubting or discussing a science subject, the wrong hypotheses and conjectures cannot be given up. The pseudoscience shall certainly be produced. Only the pseudoscience is afraid of being doubted and argued. Normally, doubt and argument are welcomed by all of the scientists. It is absurd to regard a people who did have no original work as the greatest physicist. Now, it is shown that Einstein faked all of his mathematics derivations. It should be disgrace if we still argued that Einstein is the greatest physicist and the theory of relativity is the greatest theory of physics. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, You said: “Denying them (Einstein’s SR and GR) is anti-science." But, you cannot discuss them with scientific standard in fair status. For you, what does anti-science mean? In my understanding, what you doing is anti-science. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, In the journals dominated by mainstream physicists or relativists, the blocking was done well. In a open forum, it usually cannot. In any case, it need discuss Einstein with his theory of relativity in a fair status. If that Einstein faked his results could be argued and discussed in a famous scientific journal, the mistakes in the theory of relativity should be clarified much more quickly. If you tried to block such kind a discussion, you must be lost in an open forum. But, you should do it with moderator, editor and other unscientific power. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, As we discuss a scientific subject, we only need the scientific standard. We do not need moderator. And, we do not need a scientific discussion stopped by a unscientific power. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr.Jerry Decker, Although I do not agree with you, in some degree, I think you tried your effort to be objective in these sentences: Precession of perihelion of Mercury has several causes. The Einstein contribution is not the complete precession. Light bending by gravity is predicted by Newton. Einstein did not originate SR or GR, but in both cases he provided an essential part. The question is that, this is not the general declaration by relativists. You said: N-Body problem is solved by minimizing the change of Lagrangian Function, conserving the Hamilton energy and total momentum. These together are sufficient and necessary. I have not had the knowledge about it. If you should give me an information on it, I should thank you very much. But, as I know, in current theory of gravity, the understanding about the N-body problem is wrong. The N-body problem only can be understood with the Hill sphere. But, it have not done so. As I know, in a widespread book “Einstein's Mistakes: The Human Failings of Genius”, it was shown that, Einstein made 23 mistakes in mathematics, almost including all of the main conclusions in his theory of relativity. But, from the wrong derivations, he just obtained the current (in that time) conclusions. Logically, no one can always obtain right conclusions from wrong derivations. So, this cannot be a “Failings of Genius”. Now, it was shown that some of the current (in that time) conclusions are wrong. Therefore, we only can conclude that Einstein faked his mathematics derivations and conclusions. So, it is impossible: “in both cases he provided an essential part” as your said. The crucial problem is that Einstein’s relative and curved spacetime is not true. If you are interesting, please see: [www.researchgate.net] [www.researchgate.net] … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, What is your question and waht is your topic? And, what is fair status for a discussion? … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Ed Gerck, It is absolutely: an orbit is always based on the N-body problem. And, there is no isolated gravitational field. All gravitational field are always interacted with other ones. Einstein’s the GR only is based on the isolated single one field. It is far away from the factual gravitational field. >>“This is off-topic.” But, it was previously discussed Einstein here. We need a fair status to discuss any subject. -------------------- Please note what your question is. … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr. Jerry Decker Thank you for the information: “Gunnar Nordstrom competed with Albert Einstein for developing GR, but found Einstein's version to be better than his and became a supporter of Einstein in Finland.” But, it still shows that “Einstein did not have original work in GR.” The worse problem is that Gunnar Nordstrom with his original disappeared historically. This is an ethics problem. So, the key problem of the theory of relativity is unethical. Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. But, in the past time, all of the equations and conclusions in the theory of relativity were declared to be presented independently by Einstein. The original workers with their works were shielded or covered. And, it is not so simple that “N-Body problem is solved by minimizing the change of Lagrangian Function.” The fact is: 2.Einstein’s curved spacetime has not been and cannot be used to design an orbit of a real artificial spacecraft/satellite. Relativists may argue that it can. But, they cannot argue that the curved spacetime has been used to design an orbit. 3.In fact, it cannot. To use the Einstein’s field theory designing an orbit, the Einstein gravitational time dilation must be used. But, the Hafele-keating experiment is incredible for two reasons: First, the time on the level of nanosecond cannot be measured in a vibrating and shocking plane. Second, the Newtonian gravitational force has an effect on the atoms in an atomic clock. This effect is much larger than Einstein gravitational time dilation. But, it has never been considered in the Hafele-keating experiments. 4. An orbit of a planet is usually perturbed by many factors. It is described with the Lagrange’ planetary equation which express Newtonian gravitational force and other force. The curved spacetime cannot be expressed with the Lagrange’ planetary equation. 5.The precession of perihelion of Mercury is perturbed by the oblateness of the Sun. It has never been mentioned in the textbook of a general relativity. This perturbation cannot be explained by Einstein’s general relativity. It only can be explained with Newtonian theory of gravity. And, the light bending by gravity is predicted by Newton with the classic physics. It has nothing to do with curved space. But, it was taken as a strong evidence for the curved space. And, that bending of light by gravity was regarded as the evidence to overcome Newtonian theory. It is just an absurd story! … 
Question - Should denying Einstein, special and general relativity be blocked? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2019
Answer Dear Dr.Jerry Decker, Maybe, it is a faked story that "Albert Einstein got a lot of help from the world's best mathematicians in producing GR." In fact, it is Gunnar Nordström who first presented to describe gravity with curved space and developed the mathematics. Einstein did not have original work in GR. In any case, GR is not a theory of gravity. A theory of gravity must be valid to study the orbit. An orbit is always based on the N-body problem, i.e., several planets or star, moons. But, GR is invalid to the N-body problem. Even, in GR, the N-body problem is not involved. Best regards. Zhu … 
What is the gravitational wave? Question
  • Feb 2019
Electromagnetic waves are emitted by electrically charged particles undergoing acceleration. But, it is noted that, only the charged particles that has not interacted with others can generate the electromagnetic radiation. The interacted ones cannot do so. In Einstein’s theory of relativity, the gravitational wave is generated by accelerated masses. But, it is noted that, all of the masses are always interacting with others. Why the interacted masses can generate the wave analogous to the un-interacted charged particles? …  Question - I have a problem with Einstein's field equation vs. dark matter. Can somebody "make light"? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2019
Answer Dear Dr. I think you are right. I have a work:Preprint Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o... It is shown that the conclusion from the arguments and discussions in the reseachgate showing that Einstein's theory of relativity is just a faked story. Therefore, the "dark energy", "dark mass" and "big bang" are just faked stories based on another faked story (Einstein's theory of relativity). Best regards. Zhu … 
Question - Is that possible to have peer reviewed RESEARCHGATE PUBLICATIONS like Phy. Rev. ones? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2019
Answer Good suggestion. … 
Question - I have a problem with Einstein's field equation vs. dark matter. Can somebody "make light"? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2019
Answer How to know a theory/hypothsis is a theory for gravity? I think, the only evidence is that whether it can explain and design the orbit. An orbit is always determined with N-body problem. Einstein's general relativity is unable to process the N-body problem. So, it is not a theory for gravity. Factually, it is just a faked story. Please see: Preprint Is the math in current physics beautiful? Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o... … 
The invariance of the speed of light is not true? Question
  • Feb 2019
In Einstein’s theory of relativity, it was claimed that the speed of light in a vacuum is invariant/constant. It is noted that all the speed of light are measured in the gravitational field. But, at the same time, it also well known that, a light line can be bent by gravity. So, light can be accelerated by gravity along the direction vertical to the light line. So, it just is a faked claim that the speed of light in a vacuum is invariant/constant. Could the light can be accelerated along the light line? Now, we have not had evidence for it. But, we knew, that a light line can be bent by gravity is predicted by Newton with classic physics. So, I prefer to believe that the light can be accelerated along the light line. What do you think about? …  Question - Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity ? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2019
Answer Dear Friends, Einstein's theory of relativity needs valid experimental evidence. It is only a faked story. Please see: Preprint Einstein's Relative and Curved Spacetime Needs Valid Evidence Preprint Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o... … 
Question - Can the mathematics sometimes obscure the physics? Yin Zhu
  • Jan 2019
Answer Einstein faked his mathematics derivation in his theory of relativity. Very unfortunately, the equations in the theory of relativity has great dominated on both physics and mathematics. So, there are fundamental problems in the mathematics in physics and pure mathematics. Please see: [www.researchgate.net] … 
Is the math in current physics beautiful? Preprint File available
  • Jan 2019
Misled by Einstein’s theory of relativity, many mathematics equations in current physics are wrong.Much worse, in current physics society, the basic scientific standard was neglected. Any theory or experiment which claimed to prove Einstein’s theory can be published and widely spread although it is far away from the clear and initial scientific standard. We listed three typical cases: LIGO’s detection of gravitational waves, Hafele-keating experiment and Neil Ashby’s papers on the Relativistic Effects in the Global Positioning System. A possible approach to EmDrive Experiment Findings File available
  • Sep 2018
To different materials, photon can be reflected and absorbed. The translation of momentum of the photon to different materials is different. Therefore, in a cubic box, as the materials of different sides are different, the momentum of the same photons translated to different sides are different. The difference of the momentum to different sides could make the box moved. So, the EmDrive could be invented with the materials which have different light/microwaves reflection and absorption. Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear László Attila Horváth, LIGO's detection of gravitational waves is one of the typical problem in current physics. Before this detection was confirmed, it was taken as a ground to establish many other "theories". However, there are evidences to show that LIGO's detection is wrong. Then, these "theories" are nonsense. It is a big misfortune. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer It is clear, in the geral relativity, it has never been considered that all of the gravitational fields are always interacting with other ones. But, it was declared as the greatest theory of gravity. In fact, it is invalid to understand anything about gravity. It is only a faked story by Einstein. … 
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear László Attila Horváth László Attila Horváth Thank you very much for your information. Best regards. Yin … 
Observation of the gravitomagnetic field Preprint
  • Sep 2018
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer To all readers: If one think that the line run by a light line from a very distant place to the Earth is a straight line, then, I think one is wrong. And, I shall not reply one's comment again. Now, it is well-known that, the direction of a light ray can be varied by many factors. So, we can consider this problem from the status: as a light ray is running across a galaxy, which factors can make its direction varied. Best. … 
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Malcolm, 1.This is just a assumption: "If space is "bent" they do not "see" it as "bent" (any more than light does) but travel along geodesics just as light does." 2. "It is refracted by earths atmosphere, not in interstellar space" The question is that there may be "atmosphere" in interstellar space. And, it is certain, there are electromagnetic field in interstellar space which can vary the direction of light. … 
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Malcolm White, You are right at: light is "bent" by the curvature of space. This is a well-known observation. But, what is the evidence for: “gravity waves will be "bent" in the same way by the curvature of space”. So, LIGO’s detection is based on the assumption: “gravity waves will be "bent" in the same way by the curvature of space”. This assumption needs valid evidence. It is sorry, you are wrong at: “light in interstellar space is hardly bent at all by refraction”. Please note that: in the GPS, this is the main factor that need be corrected. Best regards. Yin Johan K. Fremerey please reference this reply. … 
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Johan K. Fremerey: Should you think that the line run by a light ray from a distant place to the Earth is a straight one?" "Yes, I do, especially in view of what we are currently discussing in a parallel thread," However, I cannot think so. Even in the atomsphere, the direction of a light ray is varied by the air. Is there the evidence that the direction of a gravitational waves can be varied at the same degree? … 
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear Dr. K. Kassner, In the general relativity, how is the gravitational field self-interactions? And, what can "self-interactions of the gravitational field" mean? Best regards. Yin … 
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear [email protected] K. Fremerey, Should you think that the line run by a light ray from a distant place to the Earth is a straight one? … 
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer Dear [email protected] Ernest Grimm, You are interesting in manipulating gravity. Maybe, this is a possible way: Article Gravitational-magnetic-electric Field Interaction Best regards. Yin … 
Is there the isolated gravitational field? Question
  • Sep 2018
Till now, the gravitational field is studied and understood under the assumption that a gravitational field was not interacting with other gravitational fields. Under this assumption, it is assumed that a gravitational field is a static sphere or equipotential surface. It is analogous to an electric field. In Einstein’s general relativity, it is described with curved space. But, in fact, none of the gravitational field is isolated from other ones. All of the gravitational fields are always interacting with others. So, the gravitational field only can be right explained and understood with the interacting fields. The conclusion is: till now, no theory of gravitational field is valid in describing the actual gravitational fields. We need new theory for the gravitational field. Please see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286192164_Observation_of_the_Direction_and_Neutralization_of_Gravitational_Field_V10?_sg=k53TEJmCmT_YBVdCaS4rhzXz5rfKMDjbCkK9hvhfzmjTJNFR2CK9TThLO0PYyqU2R8yaHNCLB_biHMxJOviRlIbVa0PXjEqaW6ZJMpGL.GVijqHa5pDvhbYZYcACmTY1k8R4xuvieH59uuNT_ioHFTPaG_2Ljzzn3T0PkGnQ7MkYoQPQh1V_moqf1KqTluQ …  Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914? Yin Zhu
  • Sep 2018
Answer It is clear, LIGO’s detection of gravitational waves is not true, especially the detection from the double neutron star. LIGO is crucially confused in the theory of the gravitational wave propagation. Please see: [www.researchgate.net] … 
Question - Dr. Dennis P. Allen Jr. Yin Zhu
  • Aug 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Dennis P. Allen Jr., Thank you very much for your and coworker's book. I shall read it. In my oppinion, Einstein's theory of relativity is only a faked story. So, I agree the conclusion that the theories and experiments for the theory of relativity also is invalid. But, I did not study the seismic wave. Best regards. Yin … 
Einstein was right again? Question
  • Jul 2018
In the mainstream media, including scientific journal, it was reported again and again that “Einstein was right again!” But, very unfortunately, it has never been reported that a new production was invented with Einstein’s theory of relativity. So, as I read such kind of reports, I know a new faked story for the theory of relativity was produced. Till now, Einstein’s theory of relativity is invalid for inventing new production. Why? My answer is that this theory is just a faked story. Please see Refs.[1,2]. Maybe, more reports for that “Einstein was right again!” shall be produced. Should this kind of report be continued forever? I do not know. But, I think, the mainstream physical society need reconsider Einstein and his theory of relativity. Now, it is internet time. On internet it is generally claimed that Einstein is a plagiarist and he faked his derivations in mathematics, and, the theory of relativity is simply wrong. For example, as you input “Einstein plagiarism” into bing.com, you can get more than 100,000 results. If the mainstream physical society cannot have a valid response to it, their credit should be questioned generally. However, it is not good to respect a plagiarist as the greatest physicist. References [1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325297171_Einstein's_Relative_and_Curved_Spacetime_Needs_Valid_Evidence?_sg=P0rQl4DkF5DiiybJWtJtX-Ms17FJ2o0f3B7bNsNZBSmGuJEAkEeAguRah8pzy-2bxX-B3kAGDn8EdvDSeHmRNBb0DIUdwocNoUt8OatR.JFTe2Gc1XNAfJ3Ccvx3HkNkPRf7RQ3xFAuHw754wk4rw7SCfUd-ckK-I-neomEBjCOFB6246IVP0aUad0M8ZbA [2] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317014509_Anti-ethics_and_pseudoscience_On_Albert_Einstein's_theory_of_relativity?_sg=5lNTds4W0JOyV-eUKTCXGPCtGoslhrIJz7g_BX0kSpmEZ87NMhQcqWejaBsDIWW9VXh_8N-s5d9-AFBm36EaPBNtYsqBaQostumNtjVx.EPezU_CBAUR-25HYB22ySgsPuOc4wcgA8SUIdMuYwQMMVVJrEm8AsCIIZvyuLi5rtiAnl2jpFFvInLn1xbp4iA …  Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field? Yin Zhu
  • May 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Hassan Nima, Thank you very much for your information. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field? Yin Zhu
  • May 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Rancourt, Thank you very much for your infomation. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field? Yin Zhu
  • May 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Wraae, Thank you very much for your reply. Best regards. Yin … 
an open letter to dr james hartle Data File available
  • May 2018
I hope Dr. James Hartle should discuss this problem in a fair status. I think, the problem need be discussed by the people who are teaching their students and readers that Einstein’s theory of relativity is the greatest theory. I believe, the people who are honest to search for the scientific truth should hope to clarify this problem. Question - Do we need to abandon and maybe scavenge the Standard Model in physics? Yin Zhu
  • May 2018
Answer Dear Ed, It is the nature of the standard model or final theory to reject or to kill new idea. Without exception, all of the standard model or final theory made the development of science slow or stopped. And, a great development of science usually comes after a standard model or final theory was broken. Factually, we have known little about the world. We have a very big distance from the final theory. In physics, if we know a very little about the nature, we shall have a very big step in the human history. For example, Faraday’s law of induction changed the world much greater in the 180 years than in the early several thousands. If we can manipulate the gravitational field as manipulated the electromagnetic field, the world shall have been much greater changed. But, the standard model can tell us nothing about it. And, much worse, as an empirical model is valued to be final theory, it must result in pseudoscience. Please see: Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o... Best regards. Yin … 
Einstein's Relative and Curved Spacetime Needs Valid Evidence Preprint File available
  • May 2018
In the high energy accelerator/collider, the particles are accelerated only with absolute time and the line of the particles running is designed only with absolute space ant time. The speed of the particles in an accelerator/collider is the highest close to the speed of light, the condition is the most stable, accurate and repeatable. So, this is the crucial experiment for Einstein's relative spacetime. In addition, there is no stationary meson, it is nonsense that the mean lifetime of the highspeed meson is longer than that of the stationary one. And, the so-called Einstein's gravitational time effect of the Sun acting on the GPS is larger than that of the Earth. But, this effect of the Sun has never been considered to correct the GPS. It clearly shows that the GPS has nothing to do with Einstein's theory of relativity. Gravitational-magnetic-electric Field Interaction (V3) Experiment Findings File available
  • May 2018
From gravitational redshift/blueshift and the law of conservation of energy, we obtained equations, ∆í µí±” = √í µí±“í µí°º/í µí¼‡ 0 B and ∆í µí±” = √í µí±“Gí µí¼€ 0 E, for the interaction between gravitational and magnetic/electric field. The variation of gravitational acceleration í µí±” by a magnetic or an electric field is determined with the magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E and the gravitational redshift parameter ƒ; G, í µí¼‡ 0 and í µí¼€ 0 are gravitational, magnetic and electric constant. The equations show that the variation of gravitational field could be measured. The analogous equations are also obtained from that a magnetic/electric field is a source to produce a gravitational field. The equations should mean that not only we have a new way to understand gravity, but also we shall can use the gravitational field as we used the electromagnetic one. ************************************************* I very hope to put this work into experiment. I need co-workers. I am waiting for you. Project - To use gravitational field Yin Zhu
  • May 2018
Question Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field? We know, under a very strong magnetic field, a material is magnetized, including diamagnetism and paramagnetism. Can we have a material that cannot be affected by magnetism as this material is under a very strong magnetic field? …  Question - What is time? Yin Zhu
  • Apr 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Zin Eddine Dadach, A clock is that that can be used to measure the variation of time. So, in Moon, we can take Sun and Earth as clocks. … 
Question - What is time? Yin Zhu
  • Apr 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Zin Eddine Dadach, "the position of the sun in the sky" and "size of the crescent and the moon" are also clocks. Best … 
Question - What is time? Yin Zhu
  • Apr 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Adnan Abbas, I agree with you. Best … 
Question - What is time? Yin Zhu
  • Apr 2018
Answer Dear Dr. K N Sheth, Thank you very much for your recommendation. I think, your opinion is very interesting. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO Yin Zhu
  • Apr 2018
Answer Dear Dr.Bishal Banjara, Thank you very much for your information. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Vikram Zaveri, I do not think there is the so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model. Now, we have known little about our world. For example, why the gravity and electromagnetic force are attractive force? Can we use the gravity field as we used the electromagnetic one? The so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model can tell nothing about these problems. And, in history, there were different the so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model. All of them made the development of new theory stopped or slower. Please see:Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o... … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr.Vikram Zaveri, In gravitational redshift, a photon absobed or emitted a energy of a gravitational field. How do you think about it? Is the gravitational field quantized? Why? Best … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr.Vikram Zaveri, You are right: "There is no experimental proof for length contraction". … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Alexander Chepick, Thank you very much for your asnwer. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Vikram Zaveri, Here, relative spacetime only refers the length contraction and time dilation. … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Vikram Zaveri, No one think that the time does not existent. We only said that the space and time are not relative. … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Alexander Chepick, Thank you very much for your information. I also agree with you. I also think that "4-dimensional space-time does not exist". May you should see: Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr.Jouko A. Rautio, Thank you very much for your information. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Pistea, I think you are right. This another crucial problem for the theory of relativity. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear friends, I am very sorry for that I am wrong again. This time, I am certain I am right. In my previous version, all of the conclusions are right but the formula N(t)=N0e-ikt is wrong. The right formula for particles decay is N(t)=N0e-kt. There is not the complex number i. This is the fundamental formula for particles decay. The formula N(t)=N0e-t/T is that used by relativist to explain that the life of highspeed mesons is longer than the so-called stationary ones. In N(t)=N0e-t/T, the mean life T need be derived from N(t)=N0e-kt. So, N(t)=N0e-kt is basic while N(t)=N0e-t/T is secondary. From N(t)=N0e-kt, the previous conclusions are valid. These conclusions are: First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N0e-kt. The life of some mesons is longer than others. Third, crucially, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, First, we have to know what is the mean life of the lowspeed or stationary mesons. As I know, there is not a measured value for it. It is only assumed as the measured life of a single meason. Best It is right:The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones. … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear friends, I am very sorry, N(t)=N0e-ikt is wrong. This is my serious mistake. I apology for it. The right formula is N(t)=N0e-t/T, where T is the mean life of the mesons, t is the time of the mesons moving, N0 is the initial numbers of the mesons, N(t) is the numbers at time t. Therefore, the mean life is not determined with N0. But, I think, the current explanation about the life of the highspeed mesons still is invalid. There are three problems in the current explanation. First, it is assumed there are the stationary mesons. It is not true. Second, the mean life of the so-called stationary is not true. Third, in some of the observations, the mesons are interacting with air and other objects. For example, the life of the so-called stationary mesons is measured in a kind of liquid. It results in that these observations are inaccurate and incomparable. Best regards. Yin This question is revised according to this reply. … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Thank you for your information. Let’s consider a group of flying mesons. These mesons are decaying continually. Some decayed while some do not. As these mesons flied from a to b, the numbers at a and b are differently Na and Nb. It is described with Nb=Nae-iktab. Because e-iktab is same, Nb is only determined with Na. As Na is few and the distance ab is long, no meson can arrive at b. As Na is a very large, some of the mesons Nb can arrive at b. So, only the mean life of the mesons is important while that of a single meson is unimportant. This is the fundamental for the life of mesons. we can used it to understand the observation about the life of mesons. In all the published articles for observations of the life of the highspeed mesons, only the numbers Nb of the mesons arrived at point b is observed. And, it is assumed that there is the life of a single stationary meson. So, no valid conclusion can be obtained from these observations as usual did. Best … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, that the value 5 times time dilation could be explained by that If you should give a case, I should thank you very much. When the muons fly in one direction and can bridge with that speed a certain distance A and when they travel with half that speed they only can cover about the distance A/5. Please give a link for this observation. … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, Muons are observed to have a time dilation that extends their existence by a factor 5. I explained the life of mesons, including muons. You have not read the late part of this question. Best regards. Yin … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Vikram Zaveri, Physics is such a science that studies a natural (or real existed) object to describe some characteristic of this object. If an object with its characteristic is non-existent, we cannot have a theory of physics based on it. The relative spacetime is non-existent, where is a theory of physics for it? … 
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz, Thank you very much for your advise. I shall have some revisal on my words. Best regards. Yin … 
Project - To spread that the theory of relativity is a faked story Yin Zhu
  • Mar 2018
Question What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity? The crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity is that the relative spacetime (length contraction and time dilation) is not true. If the relative spacetime was true, in any sense, Einstein’s theory of relativity should be a very great theory. But, in fact, relative spacetime does be false. The crucial experiment is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation was observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other objects? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the highspeed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N0e-kt. The lifetime of some mesons is longer than others. Third, the mean lifetime is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones. We analysized a paper for the lifetime of highspeed muons. It is shown that the conclusion is questioned: Assuming two groups of mesons Na0=10 decaying with Na(t)=Na0e-t/Ta and Nb0=100 with Nb(t)=Na0e-t/Tb . After a time duration t, as e-t/Ta=0.01 and e-t/Tb=0.001. One muon is observed in a distance of L. Then, there are the conclusions: first, we cannot know, whether this one muon is belong to Na0 or Nb0. Second, we cannot know Ta or Tb from this one muon. So, the question is: what was measured in “Measurement of the Relativistic Time Dilation Using μ-Mesons”.[1] In [1], it was measured: The numbers of N0=563 and N(t)=408 per hour. i.e., on average, 1.56*10-7 muon is measured in one μsecond. So, in [1], it is not 563 muons of one group were measured. In a very big probability, it implies that 563 groups of N(t) were measured and one muon of one group was measured. From the above conclusions we know, first, they cannot know the mean lifetime T from one muon of one group. Second, the mean lifetime for every group is different. But, they give a same mean lifetime for all of the 563 groups. So, the conclusion in [1] is questioned. In “Measurement of the Muon Lifetime”[2], it is reported that “We find a muon lifetime of (864.6 ± 1.2) ns”. We know, in the papers to prove time dilation, the mean lifetime of the so called stationary muons is 2.19μs. If [2] is validly related with these papers, it means that all the papers for proving time dilation are invalid. As the relative spacetime does be non-existent, the hypotheses and “theories” based on it are false. Unfortunately, in the past 110 years, many theories and experiments were based on it. A lot of false stories were produced. More unfortunately, these false stories are regarded as great theories and the experiments are very dominated. So, if we hope to understand modern physics and Einstein with his theory of relativity, we have to first know whether or not the relative spacetime is true. And, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. As the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful. This question is revised according to the arguments with Professor Kåre Olaussen on Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and... …  Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Kåre Olaussen> This is my reply on Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and... in Eq.(2), T=f(g). What kind of explanation you needed? For an atomic clock, the gravitational acceleration g can make the speed of atoms in this clock varied. It results in the phase of the frequency of the atoms to shift. also, What kind of explanation you needed? Why have you not see these explanations? What happened to you? … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Kåre Olaussen> Now, we are discussing a scientific problem. Therefore, let’s only care about the science, but not law. If you prefer to law, please stop this discussion. Let’s be honest for science. I think, the Hafele-keating experiment is one of the problems of the theory of relativity. As the theory of relativity is clarified, the Hafele-keating experiment shall be well known. So, let’s discuss the problems of the theory of relativity one by one and step by step. First, all of Einstein’s conclusions in the theory of relativity are plagiarized. If you do not agree this sentence, please tell us which one of the conclusions is originally presented by Einstein. In addition, I stress that, as I said that the theory of relativity is filled with faked stories, I stressed that I do not believe the conspiracy theory. I believe everyone who made the faked story is honest. He/she is not purpose to make a faked story but believes that his work is right. We know, an experimental data is not directly accordant with a theory. It must be processed under a series of theories or assumptions. As the theories or assumptions are different, the different conclusions shall be obtained from the same data. As the theory of relativity is only a faked story, the experiment based on it is also a faked story. This status is general in scientific history. For example, some presented that Galileo cannot obtain the right data for the free fall for that in his time we have not had the ability to accurately measure such a result. Factually, almost no experimental data just is that predicted by a theory. So, it was presented that many experiments are not repeatable. So, as I saying an experiment is only a faked story, I do not critique the experimenter. I just stress that the theory of relativity made the faked stories. Just for this reasons, we need first discuss the theory of relativity. If you are an honest scientist rather than a lawyer even a shyster, please discuss the first problem. … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Kåre Olaussen>as you will talk about a court case, I prefer to talk about physics. As a honest people, please tell me, could you undersrand that the Newtonian gravity on an atomic clock is much larger than the Einstein's gravitational time effect? … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Kåre Olaussen>Please give us a quantitative prediction of the effect of Newtonian gravity on atomic clocks orbiting the Earth. With physical explanations, and preferably supported by published results. Please see: Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and... … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Kåre Olaussen, If you should tell the readers whether the experiment is a faked story, I should thank you very much. The experiment is: the life of the high speed of mesons is longer than that of the so called stationary one. I think, in any standard, “the life of the stationary meson” is just and only a faked story. And, if you should be able to tell the readers the mistakes in the words, I should thank you very much. The words: The key to Einstein’s theory of relativity is that whether or not the relative space and time (the length contraction and time dilation) is true. If it was true, in any sense, the theory of relativity should be a great theory. But, it is the fact that the relative space and time only is a faked story. The determined evidence is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation were observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other object? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the high speed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N0e-ikt. The life of some mesons is longer than others. Third, crucially, the mean life of the mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the high speed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the high speed ones. As the relative space and time only is a faked story, the coordinate transformation for it, including the Lorentz transformation, also is only a faked story. So, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. If the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful. … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer It is very sorry that Dr. Kåre Olaussen will say “You should be aware that you can be brought to court for persistent postings of false accusations”. I prefer to see that you have strong evidence to show your argument is valid. Please tell the readers: The Newtonian gravity has an effect on an atomic clock. And, the Newtonian effect is much larger than Einstein’s gravitational tine effect. Why have not the Newtonian effect been measured in the Hafele-keating experiment? … 
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Johannes Harder Andersen, You posted the same arguments again and again. But, you have never considered the arguments that others and I presented. Please consider a question: the Newtonian gravity has an effect on an atomic clock. And, the Newtonian effect is much larger than Einstein’s gravitational tine effect. Why have not the Newtonian effect been measured in the Hafele-keating experiment? Before you have not answered this problem, please not repost your argument again. … 
Question - Where special theory of relativity breaks down, and why? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Dear Dr. s h s hussainsha, Einstein’s theory of relativity just and only is a faked story. First, all of the conclusions are plagiarized. Second, all of the mathematics derivations are faked. Third, the accelerator shows that the length contraction and tie dilation are not true. So, all the experiments claimed to prove Einstein’s predictions are incredible. It is stressed: The key to Einstein’s theory of relativity is that whether or not the relative space and time (the length contraction and time dilation) is true. If it was true, in any sense, the theory of relativity should be a great theory. But, it is the fact that the relative space and time only is a faked story. The determined evidence is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation were observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other object? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the high speed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N0e-ikt. The life of some mesons is longer than others. Third, crucially, the mean life of the mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the high speed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the high speed ones. As the relative space and time only is a faked story, the coordinate transformation for it, including the Lorentz transformation, also is only a faked story. So, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. If the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful. May you see: [www.researchgate.net] … 
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Kåre Olaussen, Now, you have known that, it is a faked story that GPS need be corrected with the Hafele-keating experiment. Why do you still believe in such a "great theoy" that is made up of faked story? Best … 
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer We clearly know, a hourglasses, a mechanical clock and an atomic cklock are always acted by the Newtonian gravity. But, in all the experiments to "have proven" Einstein's theory of relativity, the Newtonian gravitational effect has never been considered. And, in these experiments, Einstein's theory were "rightly" proven. Why? Because these experiments are all faked. So, in the Hafele-keating experiment, the time on the acurate of nanosecond was measured in a shocking and vibrating plane. In any standard, this is such an experiment that is too irresponsible for science. … 
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible? Yin Zhu
  • Feb 2018
Answer Dear Dr. Johannes Harder Andersen, Please consider that what is the Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock. The effect of Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock is much larger than that of Einstein's general relativity. But, The effect of Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock has never been considered in the H-K experiment. … 
A Simple Comment on LIGO's Detection of Gravitational Wave Data File available
  • Dec 2017
Affected by gravity, air, nebula, ionized layer and so on, a light ray cannot run in a straight line. In a distance of 10 billion lightyears, a light ray is delayed and varied direction for many times. So, more time is needed compared it runs in a straight line. And, now, we have had little knowledge about gravitational wave. But, in LIGO's detection of the gravitational wave from two neutron stars merging, the gravitational wave arrive at the Earth is only 0.1 seconds before arrived at the Earth. It need that a gravitational wave is running at the speed of light and is affected by gravity, air, nebula, ionized layer and so on just as light. However, it seems incredible. Question - ResearchGate scientific journals? Yin Zhu
  • Dec 2017
Answer This is a very good idea. … 
A simple explanation for "Gravitational-magnetic-electric fields interaction" Data File available
  • Nov 2017
In ""Gravitational-magnetic-electric fields interaction", we obtain the equation ∆í µí±” = √í µí±“í µí°º/í µí¼‡ 0 ∆B. It is easy to think that, the variation of gravitational field by a magnetic one with this equation is too big to be believed. So, we have this explanation. Factually, this is an unexpected result. If this equation is valid, it means that not only we have a great progress to understand gravitational field, but also we shall can use the gravitational field as we used the electromagnetic one. Here, first, we explain why this equation is valid. Second, we show that, the ratio of energy density between a gravitational and a magnetic field is not very big. So, the variation of a gravitational by a magnetic one can be measured. Third, a gravitational field varied by a magnetic one is compared with a gravitational field produced from a magnetic field. It is shown that, this equation is valid for the two kinds of fields. Fourth, it presented, this equation can be used to design the GemDrive. 1. Condition The condition is that, in a given volume V, there are a gravitational and a magnetic field. Because of the gravitational redshift, the magnetic field is varied by the gravitational field. 2. The variation of the energy of the magnetic field Gravitational redshift showed that light varied by gravity is measurable. As the frequencies of the photons that make up of a magnetic field are varied by gravitational redshift, the energy of this magnetic field is varied correspondingly. And, this variation of energy is only related with that of the frequencies. 1 2 3 4 5 Current institution Agriculture Department of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
  • Agriculture Department of Hubei Province
Current position
  • Manager
International Laboratory of Contemporary Physics Lab head Daniele Sasso Lab members (81) +75 About News Company Careers Support Help center FAQ Business solutions Recruiting Advertising © ResearchGate 2019. All rights reserved. or Discover by subject area Join for free Log in