This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.
Yin Zhu | Agriculture Department of Hubei Province
Yin Zhu
Agriculture Department of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China · Agriculture Department of Hubei Province
Describing the gravitational redshift with graviton-photon interaction, relating the energy of the photons and gravitons to the energy density of the fields, we obtained an equation for the interaction between the gravitational and magnetic fields. In this equation, the variation of gravitational field by a magnetic field is determined with the magnetic field strength B and the parameter A which determines the variation of the frequency of photon by gravitational redshift. Treating the gravitational redshift on the surface as a constant, we obtained a table to show that as ∆B is varied from 1T to 103T, the weight of 1kg of a body in this field should be varied from 1.79×10-3g to 1.79g. Now, we can make a magnetic field with the strength of 2.8×103T. It indicates that the variation of gravitational field by a strong magnetic field could be easily measured.
To detect gravitational wave with artificial Hill sphereExperiment FindingsFile available
The mass of Pluto’s moon Charon is almost 1/10times that of the Pluto. And four little moons are out of the orbit of the Charon. If the gravitational field could be neutralized, it should be observed directly from the orbits of the four little moons of the Pluto. Now, these orbits around the barycenter of the Pluto-Charon systemwereworked out. But, it is contradicted with observation. If the orbits of these moons around the Pluto are reworked out, it maydirectly show the neutralization of gravitational field.
The Principle of Physics and MathematicsResearchFile available
The invariance of the speed of light is taken as the fundamental of modern physics. But, in recent, the faster-than-light was observed. It requires that the fundamental of the whole physics be reassessed. In this paper, in the mathematics, the definitions in Euclidean Elements are stressed. It is pointed out that these definitions are only the concepts. They are not related to a certain real object or body. In physics, the Newtonian framework is stressed. It is pointed out that, in Newtonian theory, the abstract concepts are used as the definitions in Euclidean Elements. For example, the Sun is treated just as a point particle. And the initial law only is an abstracted concept which cannot be checked with experiment while it can be understood by our brain. According to the Euclidean Elements and Newtonian theory, some of the mathematical and physical concepts in modern physics are discussed. For example, it is pointed out that the extra dimension in modern physics is not a mathematical concept of Euclidean geometry as it is related to a real pillar. It is stressed that high and fractional coordinate systems are used to describe the object that can be described with the Cartesian one. And, the equations of physics in different coordinate systems and the transformation of the equations among different coordinate systems are discussed.
A possible approach to EmDriveExperiment FindingsFile available
By analogy to the light mill, the EmDrive could be invented with the materials which have different microwave radiation and absorption.
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Dear László Attila Horváth,
LIGO's detection of gravitational waves is one of the typical problem in current physics. Before this detection was confirmed, it was taken as a ground to establish many other "theories".
However, there are evidences to show that LIGO's detection is wrong. Then, these "theories" are nonsense. It is a big misfortune.
Best regards. Yin
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
It is clear, in the geral relativity, it has never been considered that all of the gravitational fields are always interacting with other ones. But, it was declared as the greatest theory of gravity. In fact, it is invalid to understand anything about gravity. It is only a faked story by Einstein.
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field?
Yin Zhu
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
To all readers:
If one think that the line run by a light line from a very distant place to the Earth is a straight line, then, I think one is wrong. And, I shall not reply one's comment again.
Now, it is well-known that, the direction of a light ray can be varied by many factors. So, we can consider this problem from the status: as a light ray is running across a galaxy, which factors can make its direction varied.
Best.
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Malcolm,
1.This is just a assumption: "If space is "bent" they do not "see" it as "bent" (any more than light does) but travel along geodesics just as light does."
2. "It is refracted by earths atmosphere, not in interstellar space"
The question is that there may be "atmosphere" in interstellar space. And, it is certain, there are electromagnetic field in interstellar space which can vary the direction of light.
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Malcolm White，
You are right at: light is "bent" by the curvature of space.
This is a well-known observation.
But, what is the evidence for: “gravity waves will be "bent" in the same way by the curvature of space”.
So, LIGO’s detection is based on the assumption: “gravity waves will be "bent" in the same way by the curvature of space”. This assumption needs valid evidence.
It is sorry, you are wrong at: “light in interstellar space is hardly bent at all by refraction”.
Please note that: in the GPS, this is the main factor that need be corrected.
Best regards.
Yin
Johan K. Fremerey please reference this reply.
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Johan K. Fremerey:
Should you think that the line run by a light ray from a distant place to the Earth is a straight one?"
"Yes, I do, especially in view of what we are currently discussing in a parallel thread,"
However, I cannot think so. Even in the atomsphere, the direction of a light ray is varied by the air.
Is there the evidence that the direction of a gravitational waves can be varied at the same degree?
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. K. Kassner,
In the general relativity, how is the gravitational field self-interactions?
And, what can "self-interactions of the gravitational field" mean?
Best regards.
Yin
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
Dear [email protected] K. Fremerey,
Should you think that the line run by a light ray from a distant place to the Earth is a straight one?
Question - Is there the isolated gravitational field?
Yin Zhu
Question - Am I the only one that is doubtful of LIGO’s detection of gravitational wave GW150914?
Yin Zhu
Sep 2018
Answer
It is clear, LIGO’s detection of gravitational waves is not true, especially the detection from the double neutron star. LIGO is crucially confused in the theory of the gravitational wave propagation. Please see: [www.researchgate.net]
Question - Dr. Dennis P. Allen Jr.
Yin Zhu
Aug 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Dennis P. Allen Jr.,
Thank you very much for your and coworker's book. I shall read it.
In my oppinion, Einstein's theory of relativity is only a faked story. So, I agree the conclusion that the theories and experiments for the theory of relativity also is invalid. But, I did not study the seismic wave.
Best regards.
Yin
Gravitational-magnetic-electric Field InteractionArticleFull-text available
From gravitational redshift/blueshift and the law of conservation of energy, we obtained equations, ∆g=√(fG/μ_0 ) B and ∆g=√(fGε_0 ) E, for the interaction between gravitational and magnetic/electric field. The variation of gravitational acceleration ∆g is determined with the gravitational redshift parameter ƒ and the magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E; G, μ_0 and ε_0 are gravitational, magnetic and electric constant. The equations show that the variation of the gravitational field could be measured. And, we found that, the energy density of the magnetic field is close to that of the gravitational one. It also indicates that a strong magnetic field could make the variation of the energy of gravitational field measurable. The equations should mean that not only we have a new way to understand gravity, but also we shall can manipulate the gravitational field as we did the electromagnetic one.
Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory of relativity (V2)PreprintFile available
1) All of the conclusions are copied from or based on the arguments and discussions in the researchgate.net. Sometimes, the arguments are very intense and sharp. Till now, these conclusions seem solidly standing. 2) The discussed problems are easily understood. Only simple mathematics is used. From the literatures, it is clearly shown that Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. It just is a faked story that Einstein independently presented all the conclusions of the theory of relativity. 3) The conclusions are radically violent. It is certainly declared that Einstein's theory of relativity is only pseudoscience and the pseudoscience is produced from the anti-ethics: Einstein did have no original work in the theory of relativity. But, now, all of the results in the theory of relativity are ascribed to Einstein. 4) General readers may not believe the conclusions. But, as you know that all of Einstein's mathematics derivations in the theory of relativity are faked, you shall know what it means. 5) The arguments in the researchgate.net showed that, at least, no relativist can disprove the conclusions. And, some of the rational relativists have to agree some of these conclusions. But, most of the relativists only can select silent. 6) Maybe, relativists will close their eyes on the conclusions to continue the declaration that the theory of relativity is a great theory as they did in the past. But, now, it is the internet time. The conclusions cannot be concealed and shielded as did before. Now, they can be generally and quickly spread and transformed. Relativists shall lose their public credibility quickly if they could not have a valid response. 7) We clearly know, it is risk to criticize Einstein. But, we believe, all scientists, including relativists, want to know scientific truth. And, we believe, we have the clear and simple arguments. Therefore, we hope, some of the mainstream physicists should accept the conclusions. 8) It is important, Einstein's theory affected the whole system of modern physics. The modern physics was misled badly by Einstein's theory. The Standard Model and Theory for Everything are questioned.
Einstein was right again?
Question
Jul 2018
Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field?
Yin Zhu
May 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Hassan Nima,
Thank you very much for your information.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field?
Yin Zhu
May 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Rancourt,
Thank you very much for your infomation.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field?
Yin Zhu
I hope Dr. James Hartle should discuss this problem in a fair status. I think, the problem need be discussed by the people who are teaching their students and readers that Einstein’s theory of relativity is the greatest theory. I believe, the people who are honest to search for the scientific truth should hope to clarify this problem.
Question - Do we need to abandon the Standard Model in Physics?
Yin Zhu
May 2018
Answer
Dear Ed,
It is the nature of the standard model or final theory to reject or to kill new idea. Without exception, all of the standard model or final theory made the development of science slow or stopped. And, a great development of science usually comes after a standard model or final theory was broken. Factually, we have known little about the world. We have a very big distance from the final theory. In physics, if we know a very little about the nature, we shall have a very big step in the human history. For example, Faraday’s law of induction changed the world much greater in the 180 years than in the early several thousands. If we can manipulate the gravitational field as manipulated the electromagnetic field, the world shall have been much greater changed. But, the standard model can tell us nothing about it. And, much worse, as an empirical model is valued to be final theory, it must result in pseudoscience.
Please see:
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Best regards.
Yin
Einstein's Relative and Curved Spacetime Needs Valid EvidencePreprintFile available
In the high energy accelerator/collider, the particles are accelerated only with absolute time and the line of the particles running is designed only with absolute space ant time. The speed of the particles in an accelerator/collider is the highest close to the speed of light, the condition is the most stable, accurate and repeatable. So, this is the crucial experiment for Einstein's relative spacetime. In addition, there is no stationary meson, it is nonsense that the mean lifetime of the highspeed meson is longer than that of the stationary one. And, the so-called Einstein's gravitational time effect of the Sun acting on the GPS is larger than that of the Earth. But, this effect of the Sun has never been considered to correct the GPS. It clearly shows that the GPS has nothing to do with Einstein's theory of relativity.
Gravitational-magnetic-electric Field Interaction (V3)Experiment FindingsFile available
From gravitational redshift/blueshift and the law of conservation of energy, we obtained equations, ∆í µí± = √í µí±í µí°º/í µí¼ 0 B and ∆í µí± = √í µí±Gí µí¼ 0 E, for the interaction between gravitational and magnetic/electric field. The variation of gravitational acceleration í µí± by a magnetic or an electric field is determined with the magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E and the gravitational redshift parameter ƒ; G, í µí¼ 0 and í µí¼ 0 are gravitational, magnetic and electric constant. The equations show that the variation of gravitational field could be measured. The analogous equations are also obtained from that a magnetic/electric field is a source to produce a gravitational field. The equations should mean that not only we have a new way to understand gravity, but also we shall can use the gravitational field as we used the electromagnetic one. ************************************************* I very hope to put this work into experiment. I need co-workers. I am waiting for you.
Project - To use gravitational fieldYin Zhu
May 2018
Question
Can we have a material that is insulated to a strong magnetic field?
We know, under a very strong magnetic field, a material is magnetized, including diamagnetism and paramagnetism. Can we have a material that cannot be affected by magnetism as this material is under a very strong magnetic field?
Question - What is time?
Yin Zhu
Apr 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Zin Eddine Dadach,
A clock is that that can be used to measure the variation of time. So, in Moon, we can take Sun and Earth as clocks.
Question - What is time?
Yin Zhu
Apr 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Zin Eddine Dadach,
"the position of the sun in the sky" and "size of the crescent and the moon" are also clocks.
Best
Question - What is time?
Yin Zhu
Apr 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Adnan Abbas,
I agree with you.
Best
Question - What is time?
Yin Zhu
Apr 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. K N Sheth,
Thank you very much for your recommendation.
I think, your opinion is very interesting.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Apr 2018
Answer
Dear Dr.Bishal Banjara,
Thank you very much for your information.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Vikram Zaveri,
I do not think there is the so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model. Now, we have known little about our world. For example, why the gravity and electromagnetic force are attractive force? Can we use the gravity field as we used the electromagnetic one? The so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model can tell nothing about these problems.
And, in history, there were different the so-called Theory for Everything or Standard Model. All of them made the development of new theory stopped or slower.
Please see:Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr.Vikram Zaveri,
In gravitational redshift, a photon absobed or emitted a energy of a gravitational field. How do you think about it? Is the gravitational field quantized? Why?
Best
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr.Vikram Zaveri,
You are right: "There is no experimental proof for length contraction".
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Alexander Chepick,
Thank you very much for your asnwer.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Vikram Zaveri,
Here, relative spacetime only refers the length contraction and time dilation.
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Vikram Zaveri,
No one think that the time does not existent.
We only said that the space and time are not relative.
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Alexander Chepick,
Thank you very much for your information.
I also agree with you.
I also think that "4-dimensional space-time does not exist". May you should see:
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr.Jouko A. Rautio,
Thank you very much for your information.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Paul Pistea,
I think you are right. This another crucial problem for the theory of relativity.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear friends,
I am very sorry for that I am wrong again.
This time, I am certain I am right.
In my previous version, all of the conclusions are right but the formula N(t)=N_{0}e^{-ikt} is wrong.
The right formula for particles decay is N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt}. There is not the complex number i.
This is the fundamental formula for particles decay. The formula N(t)=N_{0}e^{-t/T} is that used by relativist to explain that the life of highspeed mesons is longer than the so-called stationary ones. In N(t)=N_{0}e^{-t/T}, the mean life T need be derived from N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt}. So, N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt} is basic while N(t)=N_{0}e^{-t/T} is secondary.
From N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt}, the previous conclusions are valid. These conclusions are:
First, there are not the so-called stationary particles.
Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt}. The life of some mesons is longer than others.
Third, crucially, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N_{0}. If the number N_{0} of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz,
First, we have to know what is the mean life of the lowspeed or stationary mesons. As I know, there is not a measured value for it. It is only assumed as the measured life of a single meason.
Best
It is right:The mean life is determined with N_{0}. If the number N_{0} of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones.
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear friends,
I am very sorry, N(t)=N_{0}e^{-ikt} is wrong. This is my serious mistake. I apology for it.
The right formula is N(t)=N_{0}e^{-t/T}, where T is the mean life of the mesons, t is the time of the mesons moving, N_{0} is the initial numbers of the mesons, N(t) is the numbers at time t.
Therefore, the mean life is not determined with N_{0}.
But, I think, the current explanation about the life of the highspeed mesons still is invalid.
There are three problems in the current explanation.
First, it is assumed there are the stationary mesons. It is not true.
Second, the mean life of the so-called stationary is not true.
Third, in some of the observations, the mesons are interacting with air and other objects. For example, the life of the so-called stationary mesons is measured in a kind of liquid. It results in that these observations are inaccurate and incomparable.
Best regards.
Yin
This question is revised according to this reply.
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr.
Thank you for your information.
Let’s consider a group of flying mesons. These mesons are decaying continually. Some decayed while some do not. As these mesons flied from a to b, the numbers at a and b are differently N_{a }and N_{b}. It is described with N_{b}=N_{a}e^{-ikt}_{ab}. Because e^{-iktab} is same, N_{b} is only determined with N_{a}. As N_{a} is few and the distance ab is long, no meson can arrive at b. As N_{a} is a very large, some of the mesons N_{b} can arrive at b.
So, only the mean life of the mesons is important while that of a single meson is unimportant.
This is the fundamental for the life of mesons. we can used it to understand the observation about the life of mesons.
In all the published articles for observations of the life of the highspeed mesons, only the numbers N_{b} of the mesons arrived at point b is observed. And, it is assumed that there is the life of a single stationary meson. So, no valid conclusion can be obtained from these observations as usual did.
Best
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz,
that the value 5 times time dilation could be explained by that
If you should give a case, I should thank you very much.
When the muons fly in one direction and can bridge with that speed a certain distance A and when they travel with half that speed they only can cover about the distance A/5.
Please give a link for this observation.
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Paul Gradenwitz,
Muons are observed to have a time dilation that extends their existence by a factor 5.
I explained the life of mesons, including muons. You have not read the late part of this question.
Best regards.
Yin
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Mar 2018
Answer
Vikram Zaveri，
Physics is such a science that studies a natural (or real existed) object to describe some characteristic of this object. If an object with its characteristic is non-existent, we cannot have a theory of physics based on it.
The relative spacetime is non-existent, where is a theory of physics for it?
Question - What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
Yin Zhu
Question
What is the crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity?
The crucial problem of Einstein’s theory of relativity is that the relative spacetime (length contraction and time dilation) is not true.
If the relative spacetime was true, in any sense, Einstein’s theory of relativity should be a very great theory. But, in fact, relative spacetime does be false.
The crucial experiment is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation was observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other objects? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the highspeed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N_{0}e^{-kt}. The lifetime of some mesons is longer than others. Third, the mean lifetime is determined with N_{0}. If the number N_{0} of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the highspeed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the highspeed ones.
We analysized a paper for the lifetime of highspeed muons. It is shown that the conclusion is questioned:
Assuming two groups of mesons Na0=10 decaying with Na(t)=Na0e-t/Ta and Nb0=100 with Nb(t)=Na0e-t/Tb . After a time duration t, as e-t/Ta=0.01 and e-t/Tb=0.001. One muon is observed in a distance of L.
Then, there are the conclusions:
first, we cannot know, whether this one muon is belong to Na0 or Nb0.
Second, we cannot know Ta or Tb from this one muon.
So, the question is: what was measured in “Measurement of the Relativistic Time Dilation Using μ-Mesons”.[1]
In [1], it was measured: The numbers of N0=563 and N(t)=408 per hour. i.e., on average, 1.56*10-7 muon is measured in one μsecond.
So, in [1], it is not 563 muons of one group were measured. In a very big probability, it implies that 563 groups of N(t) were measured and one muon of one group was measured.
From the above conclusions we know, first, they cannot know the mean lifetime T from one muon of one group.
Second, the mean lifetime for every group is different. But, they give a same mean lifetime for all of the 563 groups.
So, the conclusion in [1] is questioned.
In “Measurement of the Muon Lifetime”[2], it is reported that “We find a muon lifetime of (864.6 ± 1.2) ns”. We know, in the papers to prove time dilation, the mean lifetime of the so called stationary muons is 2.19μs. If [2] is validly related with these papers, it means that all the papers for proving time dilation are invalid.
As the relative spacetime does be non-existent, the hypotheses and “theories” based on it are false. Unfortunately, in the past 110 years, many theories and experiments were based on it. A lot of false stories were produced. More unfortunately, these false stories are regarded as great theories and the experiments are very dominated.
So, if we hope to understand modern physics and Einstein with his theory of relativity, we have to first know whether or not the relative spacetime is true.
And, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. As the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful.
This question is revised according to the arguments with Professor Kåre Olaussen on Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and...
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Kåre Olaussen>
This is my reply on Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and...
in Eq.(2), T=f(g). What kind of explanation you needed?
For an atomic clock, the gravitational acceleration g can make the speed of atoms in this clock varied. It results in the phase of the frequency of the atoms to shift. also, What kind of explanation you needed? Why have you not see these explanations?
What happened to you?
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Kåre Olaussen>
Now, we are discussing a scientific problem. Therefore, let’s only care about the science, but not law. If you prefer to law, please stop this discussion.
Let’s be honest for science.
I think, the Hafele-keating experiment is one of the problems of the theory of relativity. As the theory of relativity is clarified, the Hafele-keating experiment shall be well known. So, let’s discuss the problems of the theory of relativity one by one and step by step.
First, all of Einstein’s conclusions in the theory of relativity are plagiarized. If you do not agree this sentence, please tell us which one of the conclusions is originally presented by Einstein.
In addition, I stress that, as I said that the theory of relativity is filled with faked stories, I stressed that I do not believe the conspiracy theory. I believe everyone who made the faked story is honest. He/she is not purpose to make a faked story but believes that his work is right.
We know, an experimental data is not directly accordant with a theory. It must be processed under a series of theories or assumptions. As the theories or assumptions are different, the different conclusions shall be obtained from the same data. As the theory of relativity is only a faked story, the experiment based on it is also a faked story. This status is general in scientific history. For example, some presented that Galileo cannot obtain the right data for the free fall for that in his time we have not had the ability to accurately measure such a result. Factually, almost no experimental data just is that predicted by a theory. So, it was presented that many experiments are not repeatable.
So, as I saying an experiment is only a faked story, I do not critique the experimenter. I just stress that the theory of relativity made the faked stories.
Just for this reasons, we need first discuss the theory of relativity.
If you are an honest scientist rather than a lawyer even a shyster, please discuss the first problem.
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Kåre Olaussen>as you will talk about a court case, I prefer to talk about physics.
As a honest people, please tell me, could you undersrand that the Newtonian gravity on an atomic clock is much larger than the Einstein's gravitational time effect?
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Kåre Olaussen>Please give us a quantitative prediction of the effect of Newtonian gravity on atomic clocks orbiting the Earth. With physical explanations, and preferably supported by published results.
Please see:
Data A comparison between Newtonian gravitational time effect and...
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Kåre Olaussen,
If you should tell the readers whether the experiment is a faked story, I should thank you very much.
The experiment is: the life of the high speed of mesons is longer than that of the so called stationary one.
I think, in any standard, “the life of the stationary meson” is just and only a faked story.
And, if you should be able to tell the readers the mistakes in the words, I should thank you very much.
The words:
The key to Einstein’s theory of relativity is that whether or not the relative space and time (the length contraction and time dilation) is true. If it was true, in any sense, the theory of relativity should be a great theory. But, it is the fact that the relative space and time only is a faked story. The determined evidence is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation were observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other object? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the high speed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N_{0}e^{-ikt}. The life of some mesons is longer than others. Third, crucially, the mean life of the mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N_{0} of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the high speed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the high speed ones.
As the relative space and time only is a faked story, the coordinate transformation for it, including the Lorentz transformation, also is only a faked story. So, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. If the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful.
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
It is very sorry that Dr. Kåre Olaussen will say “You should be aware that you can be brought to court for persistent postings of false accusations”. I prefer to see that you have strong evidence to show your argument is valid.
Please tell the readers:
The Newtonian gravity has an effect on an atomic clock. And, the Newtonian effect is much larger than Einstein’s gravitational tine effect. Why have not the Newtonian effect been measured in the Hafele-keating experiment?
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Johannes Harder Andersen,
You posted the same arguments again and again. But, you have never considered the arguments that others and I presented.
Please consider a question: the Newtonian gravity has an effect on an atomic clock. And, the Newtonian effect is much larger than Einstein’s gravitational tine effect. Why have not the Newtonian effect been measured in the Hafele-keating experiment?
Before you have not answered this problem, please not repost your argument again.
Question - Where special theory of relativity breaks down, and why?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. s h s hussainsha,
Einstein’s theory of relativity just and only is a faked story. First, all of the conclusions are plagiarized. Second, all of the mathematics derivations are faked. Third, the accelerator shows that the length contraction and tie dilation are not true. So, all the experiments claimed to prove Einstein’s predictions are incredible. It is stressed: The key to Einstein’s theory of relativity is that whether or not the relative space and time (the length contraction and time dilation) is true. If it was true, in any sense, the theory of relativity should be a great theory. But, it is the fact that the relative space and time only is a faked story. The determined evidence is that, in the high energy accelerator, the speed of particles is the highest close to the speed of light and the condition is the most stable, precession and repeatable. But, no length contraction and time dilation were observed in it. Then, why the relative space and time was observed in other object? It is certain, these observations are false. For example, it is not true that the life of the high speed mesons is longer than that of the stationary ones. First, there are not the so-called stationary particles. Second, the mesons decay with N(t)=N0e-ikt. The life of some mesons is longer than others. Third, crucially, the mean life of the mesons was not considered. The mean life is determined with N0. If the number N0 of the so-called stationary mesons are larger than that of the high speed ones, the mean life of the so-called stationary mesons may be longer than that of the high speed ones. As the relative space and time only is a faked story, the coordinate transformation for it, including the Lorentz transformation, also is only a faked story. So, may I advise the friends who try to advance the theory of relativity or to develop new theory from it. If the space and time are not relative, these tries are unfruitful. May you see: [www.researchgate.net]
Question - How much, and how, does a Global Positioning System (GPS) depend on relativity theories?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Kåre Olaussen,
Now, you have known that, it is a faked story that GPS need be corrected with the Hafele-keating experiment.
Why do you still believe in such a "great theoy" that is made up of faked story?
Best
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
We clearly know, a hourglasses, a mechanical clock and an atomic cklock are always acted by the Newtonian gravity.
But, in all the experiments to "have proven" Einstein's theory of relativity, the Newtonian gravitational effect has never been considered. And, in these experiments, Einstein's theory were "rightly" proven. Why? Because these experiments are all faked. So, in the Hafele-keating experiment, the time on the acurate of nanosecond was measured in a shocking and vibrating plane. In any standard, this is such an experiment that is too irresponsible for science.
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible?
Yin Zhu
Feb 2018
Answer
Dear Dr. Johannes Harder Andersen,
Please consider that what is the Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock.
The effect of Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock is much larger than that of Einstein's general relativity. But, The effect of Newtonian gravitational force on an atomic clock has never been considered in the H-K experiment.
Project - To spread that the theory of relativity is a faked story
Yin Zhu
Jan 2018
To spread that the theory of relativity is a...
Update
To invite coworkers: If you agree with the conclusions in Reference [1], you are welcome to transmit it to others, including your peers, friends and the people you think that who is learned about the theory of relativity.
A Simple Comment on LIGO's Detection of Gravitational WaveDataFile available
Affected by gravity, air, nebula, ionized layer and so on, a light ray cannot run in a straight line. In a distance of 10 billion lightyears, a light ray is delayed and varied direction for many times. So, more time is needed compared it runs in a straight line. And, now, we have had little knowledge about gravitational wave. But, in LIGO's detection of the gravitational wave from two neutron stars merging, the gravitational wave arrive at the Earth is only 0.1 seconds before arrived at the Earth. It need that a gravitational wave is running at the speed of light and is affected by gravity, air, nebula, ionized layer and so on just as light. However, it seems incredible.
Question - ResearchGate scientific journals?
Yin Zhu
In ""Gravitational-magnetic-electric fields interaction", we obtain the equation ∆í µí± = √í µí±í µí°º/í µí¼ 0 ∆B. It is easy to think that, the variation of gravitational field by a magnetic one with this equation is too big to be believed. So, we have this explanation. Factually, this is an unexpected result. If this equation is valid, it means that not only we have a great progress to understand gravitational field, but also we shall can use the gravitational field as we used the electromagnetic one. Here, first, we explain why this equation is valid. Second, we show that, the ratio of energy density between a gravitational and a magnetic field is not very big. So, the variation of a gravitational by a magnetic one can be measured. Third, a gravitational field varied by a magnetic one is compared with a gravitational field produced from a magnetic field. It is shown that, this equation is valid for the two kinds of fields. Fourth, it presented, this equation can be used to design the GemDrive. 1. Condition The condition is that, in a given volume V, there are a gravitational and a magnetic field. Because of the gravitational redshift, the magnetic field is varied by the gravitational field. 2. The variation of the energy of the magnetic field Gravitational redshift showed that light varied by gravity is measurable. As the frequencies of the photons that make up of a magnetic field are varied by gravitational redshift, the energy of this magnetic field is varied correspondingly. And, this variation of energy is only related with that of the frequencies.
Gravitational-magnetic-electric Fields Interaction(v2)PreprintFile available
From the observations that gravity has an action on light and strong magnetic field makes gravitational field varied, describing the gravitational redshift with graviton-photon interaction, relating the energy of both the photons and gravitons to the energy density of the fields, we obtained equations, ∆í µí± = √í µí±í µí°º/í µí¼ 0 ∆B and ∆í µí± = √í µí±Gí µí¼ 0 ∆E , for the interaction between the gravitational and magnetic/electric fields respectively. In the equations, the variation of gravitational acceleration by a magnetic or an electric field is determined respectively with the variation of magnetic flux density B or the electric field intensity E and the parameter ƒ which determines the variation of the frequency of photon by gravitational redshift. Treating the gravitational redshift on the surface of the Earth as a constant, we obtained two Tables to show that as ∆B is varied from 1 T to 10 3 T, the weight of 1kg of a body in this field should be varied from 6.13×10-5 g to 6.13×10-2 g. Now, we can make magnetic field of 2.8×10 3 T. And, as ∆E is varied from 1kV/m to 10 4 kV/m, the weight of 1kg of a body in this field should be varied from 6.53 ×10-11 g to 6.53×10-7 g. It indicates that the variation of gravitational field by a strong magnetic field could be easily measured.
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
This is translated from Chinese:
[www.researchgate.net]
In August or July, a team obtained an analyzing conclusion. It showed that, after the signal of gravitational waves is abstracted, there is a time sequence relationship in the "noise" in the data. Principally, the time sequence relationship is a problem. It means that LIGO's filter algorithm is questioned.
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
GD: copy the original data here.
as I know, your data are wrong.
Question - Stockholm Gate right now ?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Was the detection of gravitational waves manipulated? I cannot know.
But, it is clear, the press conference was manipulated: The observation of the collision of the neutrons stars is reported at the same press conference. Why the two observations can be reported at the same time and treated as same one "big news"? Why the researchers who observed the collision did not report their results independently?
Whether or not the detection is true, many people do not like a manipulated report.
However, there are scientific problem in this detection.
First, as presented previously, the waveform of a gravitational wave from a distance almost 10 billion lightyears must be varied for that its energy can be varied by the instruments of LIGO. But, in this detection, it almost was not varied.
Second, it is well-known that, a light ray can be bended by gravity. So, a light ray from a distance almost 10 billion lightyear is not running in a straight line. But, what is the line that a gravitational wave is running? Now, we have not had a certain knowledge. There is a Bi-metrics theory for this problem. In it, the gravitational wave and light ray are running in different lines. It is concluded that, in the distance of 10 billion lightyears, a gravitational wave should be later almost 6 days than a light ray to arrive at the Earth.
A general reader can have not the knowledge about the line that a gravitational wave running is different from that a light line running. But, LIGO have to tell the readers that what is the line that the gravitational wave is running and when it arrived at the Earth comparing with a light ray.
I read a very interesting article in Chinese in
[www.researchgate.net]
Many problems were discussed in detailed here.
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Was the detection of gravitational waves manipulated? I cannot know.
But, it is clear, the press conference was manipulated: The observation of the collision of the neutrons stars is reported at the same press conference. Why the two observations can be reported at the same time and treated as same one "big news"? Why the researchers who observed the collision did not report their results independently?
Whether or not the detection is true, many people do not like a manipulated report.
However, there are scientific problem in this detection.
First, as presented previously, the waveform of a gravitational wave from a distance almost 10 billion lightyears must be varied for that its energy can be varied by the instruments of LIGO. But, in this detection, it almost was not varied.
Second, it is well-known that, a light ray can be bended by gravity. So, a light ray from a distance almost 10 billion lightyear is not running in a straight line. But, what is the line that a gravitational wave is running? Now, we have not had a certain knowledge. There is a Bi-metrics theory for this problem. In it, the gravitational wave and light ray are running in different lines. It is concluded that, in the distance of 10 billion lightyears, a gravitational wave should be later almost 6 days than a light ray to arrive at the Earth.
A general reader can have not the knowledge about the line that a gravitational wave running is different from that a light line running. But, LIGO have to tell the readers that what is the line that the gravitational wave is running and when it arrived at the Earth comparing with a light ray.
I read a very interesting article in Chinese in
[www.researchgate.net]
Many problems were discussed in detailed here.
Question - If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
E=mc^2 was presented before 1905. Einstein derived E=mc^2 for more than 10 times. But, all of his derivations are wrong. Einstein only faked his derivations.
Please see the cited reference.
Question - If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Ramesh Chandra,
That "It would be difficult to interpret the constant 'c' in the Maxwell's equations properly on the ground of the principle of relativity."
cannot mean that Einstein's theory of relativity is valid.
In my cited reference, it is shown that, in the Lorentz transformation, the speed of light along the y' and z' axes is infinitely large.
Best wishes.
Question - If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Mutasem Z. Bani-Fwaz,
Thank you very much for your comments.
I think, although the four forces had been unified, we cannot have the "theory for every things". For example, how to use the gravitational field has never been considered in the "theory for every things".
Best wishes.
Question - If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Nizar Matar,
I think, many people think you are genius.
Best wishes.
Question - If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
Yin Zhu
Question
If there was not Einstein’s theory of relativity, what we should lose?
We are very clear, if there was not Newtonian theory, we should not have car and satellite and many other productions. If there was not the Faraday's law of induction, we should not have electric power. If there was not the Rutherford-Bohr atomic model and quantum theory, we should not have modern instruments, such as mobile phone and PC.
But, if there was not Einstein's theory of relativity, what we should not have?
Einstein's theory of relativity has never contributed anything to our world, why it is a great theory?
This is a determined problem for Einstein's theory of relativity. So, relativists faked that the GPS need be corrected with the Hafele-keating experiment. But, factually, the Hafele-keating experiment is incredible.
About the related problems, please see:
[www.researchgate.net]
Question - Why the Galaxies are shaped as a disk not as ball?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Maybe, this is another possible:
[www.researchgate.net]
However, more evidences are needed.
Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
Question - We have addressed this issue in the attached publication, is it useful?
Yin Zhu
Oct 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Harold E. Puthoff,
I think, the orbit of satellite is the best-known object to understand the theory of gravity. Now, only the Newtonian theory of gravity can be used to design this orbit. If a theory of gravity cannot be used to design this orbit, this theory is questioned.
It is certain, in the Newtonian theory of gravity, the speed of gravity is instantaneous. Our first observation about the speed of gravity is an observation based on the orbit of a satellite perturbed by the Sun. It is clearly shown that, the speed of gravitational force of the Sun acting on the satellite is much larger than c.
Please see:
[www.researchgate.net]
here, the speed of gravitational force is defined. And, the speed related to the gravitational wave detected by LIGO is discussed.
Putting van Flandern’s case and the arguments of the authors who against to van Flandern into the Milky Way, we can have an intuitive and much more clear imagine that the speed of gravity is much larger than c. please see:
[www.researchgate.net]
Therefore, I think, the speed of gravitational force is much larger than c.
In addition, I think, Einstein’s theory of relativity is invalid. We need develop new theory of physics. Please see:
[www.researchgate.net]
And, as some (or many?) of the mainstream physicists presented: Is it time to discard the theory of relativity? Please see:
J. Bekenstein, Physics crunch: Time to discard relativity? [www.researchgate.net]
I think, I have a systematic study about the speed of gravity. If these studies could be useful for you, I should be very glad.
Best regards.
Yin
Article Trouble with physics: Time to discard relativity?
Experiment Findings The speed of gravity: An observation on galaxy motions
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Data The speed of gravity: An observation on satellite motions v2The speed of gravity: An observation on satellite motions v2DataFile available
This is the second version. Here, the speed of gravitational force is defined. And, the speed of gravity related the gravitational wave detected by LIGO is discussed.
Question - What is a shape of spherical light wave in moving frame?
Yin Zhu
Aug 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Zbigniew,
I read your question and answers. I know, there was a current reiew that as two spheres respectively at the origins of the satationary and moving systems, observed at O' of the origin of the moving system, the sphere in the stationary system also is ellipsoid. In this explanation, the relative effect only is one obsvered one.
But, please note the Hafele-keating experiment. The moving clock is really become slower with velocity as it returned to the Earth. So, in the theory of relativity, this is not one observed effect. It is a real effect. Just in this sense, the twin paradox is possible.
So, in my work Ref.[5], it is sentenced: "In the standard explanation of length contraction and time dilation....". The meaning of "standard explanation" is that it has been known well by a learned relativist.
Question - Does electromagnetic radiation (or electromagnetic energy) show gravity?
Yin Zhu
Answer
Dear Dr. Johannes Harder Andersen,
Thank you for your answers.
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is the Hafele-keating experiment credible?
Yin Zhu
Aug 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Peter Jackson presented a very valued data on [www.researchgate.net]
I copy it here:
I researched H&K quite deeply.
Hafele's NY speech before submission of the paper was telling, clearly stating the results were not consistent with the theory. The draft was unfortunately rejected, even initially by their professor, and they were forced to change it against their will to get it published.
Adrian
That's all your misguided comments can achieve. Professors and editors won't tolerate any advancement of understanding if it appears to conflict with older 'established' theory.
Article Does an intrinsic time dilatation really exist?
Question - What you wil tell about the Tesla opinion about the Theory of Relativity?
Yin Zhu
Aug 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Angel Toshkov,
A very crucial problem. If you should tell me where the Tesla's opinion is from, I should thank you very much.
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is it possible to control gravitation using an electromagnetic field?
Yin Zhu
Aug 2017
Answer
Dear Brian,
Thank you very much for your information.
Question - Does the length of a clock will occur changed after journey in space?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Dear friends,
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is it possible to control gravitation using an electromagnetic field?
Yin Zhu
Answer
Dear Dr. Arturo Tozzi,
You have to discuss and argue the theory of relativity with scientific standard.
As you asked a question about this theory, you have to know what it is first. If you think the theory of relativity cannot be argued with scientific standard, it just show that it is pseudoscience.
Question - In special relativity, a fast sphere is perceived as squeezed, or unchanged?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Arturo Tozzi,
No people can tell you a valid result for this.
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Dear Henk Smid,
Thank you for your information.
Question - Is the non locality of the gravitational energy a serious problem for General Relativity (GRT)?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Dear friends,
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is Einstein's curved spacetime version of gravity truely equivalent to a flat spacetime in which clocks and rulers adjust their rates and lengths?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Dear Dr. Ilja Schmelzer,
Before you have a conclusion on my work, you have to read it first.
Question - Is the Minkowski metric valid, since it cannot explain Mercury's perihelion advance nor the bending of light?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is Einstein's curved spacetime version of gravity truely equivalent to a flat spacetime in which clocks and rulers adjust their rates and lengths?
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
Very unfortunately, not only Einstein’s theory of relativity is just a faked story or pseudoscience, but also the so-called Standard Model should result in pseudoscience if we cannot rightly treat it. May you see:
[www.researchgate.net]
I am spreading this article. If anyone should help to this spreading, I should thank him/her very much.
Data Anti-ethics and pseudoscience: On Albert Einstein's theory o...
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu
Jul 2017
Answer
GD: I think you clearly sentenced your opinions. So, my words is not reply for you. The next words is my opinion.
1. The black hole cannot be directly observed. It only can be indirectly observed with the object near the black hole, such as the motion of celestial bodies, magnetic field. Now, the black hole has not been confirmed with indirect evidence.
2. LIGO have never observed the merging of two black holes. They have not known the direction of this merging.
3. LIGO detected some kinds of signal which they claimed that this signal is the gravitational waves.
4. But, this signal may be: 1) merging of two black holes. 2) earthquake which is very weak that cannot be detected with general gravimetor/seismometer. 3) only noise. 4) some kinds of conclusion accordant with a special parameter for the instrument.
Question - Is the detection of gravitational wave by LIGO true? An open question to LIGO
Yin Zhu