This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Earth's nine life-support systems: Biodiversity | New Scientist



Sign up to our daily email newsletter

Subscribe and save Forgotten Password?

Sign up for free|Educational access

Sign up for more online articles

A selection of top articles hand-picked by our editors available only to registered users.

Get increased access now

Manage your subscription

Check your subscription package, update your details, renew or upgrade.

Manage your subscription here

Activate subscription

Earth's nine life-support systems: Biodiversity

24 February 2010

By Fred Pearce

Amphibians like this guy comprise just some of many species at risk from habitat loss, climate change, pollution and pesticides, introduced species, and over-collection for food and pets

(Image: Jeff Pachoud/Getty)

Boundary: Annual species extinction rate no more than 10 per million per year

Current level: At least 100 per million per year

Diagnosis: Boundary far exceeded


Humans are driving species to extinction by ploughing up or paving over their habitats, by introducing alien species like rats and weeds, by poisoning them with pollution, by hunting them for food and, increasingly, by changing the climate. Individual species may not matter much on their own, but collectively they form ecosystems that provide a range of vital “ecosystem services”, such as recycling waste, cleaning water, absorbing carbon and maintaining the chemistry of the oceans.

Although we know that high levels of biodiversity are essential to healthy ecosystems, it is not yet clear how much can be lost before ecosystems collapse, nor which species are the key players in a given ecosystem. So Rockström’s team settled on crude extinction rates as the best “interim indicator” of the state of ecosystems. They put the current extinction rate at more than 100 extinctions per million species per year, and rising. That compares with a natural “background” extinction rate of around 0.3. Up to 30 per cent of all mammal, bird and amphibian species will be threatened with extinction this century.

This cannot go on safely. Current rates may even mirror those of the “big five” mass extinctions of the past half-billion years, including the meteorite strike that did for the dinosaurs. While the world carried on after those events, it was massively transformed. To avoid a repeat, they suggest a safe long-term annual extinction rate of no more than 10 per million species per year. By that measure, they say, “humanity has already entered deep into a danger zone… if the current extinction rate is sustained”.

Read more: From ocean to ozone: Earth’s nine life-support systems

  1. NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of physics
  2. US green economy has 10 times more jobs than the fossil fuel industry
  3. One in 16 US women were forced into having sex for the first time
  4. Extinction Rebellion protests should be embraced, not banned
  5. Extremely dexterous robot can solve a Rubik's cube one-handed
  1. DeepMind AI beats humans at deciphering damaged ancient Greek tablets
  2. Inside Sri Lanka's deadly struggle to live peacefully with elephants
  3. What makes Donald Trump orange, and other taxing questions
  4. Long strand of DNA from Neanderthals found in people from Melanesia
  5. Google gets green light to access five years of NHS patient data
  1. Blue Planet II’s Steve Simpson explores the sounds of the ocean
  2. Mixed reality in military aircraft of the future
  3. How the young can rejuvenate the old
  4. Skeletons: the frame of life
  5. The delightful and dangerous world of liquids
  1. DeepMind AI beats humans at deciphering damaged ancient Greek tablets
  2. Long strand of DNA from Neanderthals found in people from Melanesia
  3. SpaceX plans to put more than 40,000 satellites in space
  4. Early mouse fetuses generated without sperm or eggs for first time
  5. Quiz: How well do you cope with uncertainty?