This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Comparative Demography of Two Commensal Macaques in India: Implications for Population Status and Conservation - Abstract - Folia Primatologica 2013, Vol. 84, No. 6 - Karger Publishers

JavaScript is currently disabled, this site works much better if you enable JavaScript in your browser.

0 item 0 item Login Help

Login to MyKarger

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or OpenAthens)

For the academic login, please select your organization on the next page. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

OpenAthens/Shibboleth

Journal Menu

Technical Report

Comparative Demography of Two Commensal Macaques in India: Implications for Population Status and Conservation

Kumar R.a · Sinha A.a, b · Radhakrishna S.a

Author affiliations

aEcology, Behaviour and Conservation Programme and School of Natural Sciences and Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore, and bThe Primate Programme, Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, India

Keywords: PrimatesRhesus macaqueBonnet macaqueDistributionAnthropogenic habitatsHuman introductions

Related Articles for ""

Folia Primatol 2013;84:384-393 [doi.org]

Do you have an account?

To view the fulltext, please log in To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: June 30, 2011
Accepted: May 08, 2013
Published online: September 10, 2013
Issue release date: October 2013

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0015-5713 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9980 (Online)

For additional information: [www.karger.com]

Abstract

Rhesus and bonnet macaques are among the most common primates found in India and have been categorised as being of Least Concern by the IUCN. Despite the wealth of information on their ecology and behaviour, little attention has been paid to their demography or population status. We studied the demographic status of the two species along their common distribution zone in western, central and south-eastern India. Bonnet macaques were largely found in forest areas whereas rhesus macaques were observed more often in human-dominated habitats. The troop sizes of the two species also tended to be largest in different habitats, bonnet macaques in forested areas and rhesus macaques in urban areas. We suggest that the presence of large numbers of rhesus macaques in anthropogenic areas in south-eastern India is not a natural phenomenon but has been caused by human intervention. The bonnet macaque population has decreased in number in the common distribution zone, and as this species, unlike the rhesus macaque, is endemic to India, we strongly recommend the need to reassess its conservation status.

© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Alexander RD (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 325-383. External Resources
  2. Barton RA (1993). Sociospatial mechanisms of feeding competition in female olive baboons, Papio anubis. Animal Behaviour 46: 791-802. External Resources
  3. Barton RA, Byrne RW, Whiten A (1996). Ecology, feeding competition and social structure in baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38: 321-329. External Resources
  4. Datta-Roy A, Sinha A (2001). Food, sex and society: social evolution among wild bonnet macaques. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tropical Ecosystems: Structure, Diversity and Human Welfare (Ganeshaiah KN, Uma Shaanker R, Bawa KS, eds.), pp 727-731. New Delhi, Oxford IBH.
  5. Dittus WPJ (1979). The evolution of behaviors regulating density and age-specific sex ratios in a primate population. Behaviour 69: 265-302. External Resources
  6. D'Souza L, Singh M (1992). Density and demography in roadside bonnet monkeys (Macaca radiata) around Mysore. Journal of Ecobiology 4: 87-93.
  7. Eisenberg JF (1979). Habitat, economy, and society: some correlations and hypotheses for the Neotropical primates. In Primate Ecology and Human Origins: Ecological Influences on Social Organization (Bernstein IS, Smith EO, eds.), pp 215-262. New York, Garland Press.
  8. Eisenberg JF, Muckenhirn NA, Rudran R (1972). The relation between ecology and social structure in primates. Science 176: 863-874. External Resources
  9. Fooden J (1981). Taxonomy and evolution of the sinica group of macaques. 2. Species and subspecies account of the Indian bonnet macaque, Macaca radiata. FieldianaZoology (New Series) 9: 1-52.
  10. Fooden J (2000). Systematic review of the rhesus macaque, Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780). FieldianaZoology (New Series) 96: 1-180.
  11. Fooden J, Mahabal A, Saha SS (1981). Redefinition of rhesus macaque-bonnet macaque boundary in peninsular India (Primates: Macaca mulatta, M. radiata). Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 78: 463-474.
  12. Isbell LA (1990). Sudden short-term increase in mortality of vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) due to leopard predation in Amboseli National Park, Kenya. American Journal of Primatology 21: 41-52. External Resources
  13. Isbell LA (1994). Predation on primates: ecological patterns and evolutionary consequences. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 3: 61-71. External Resources
  14. IUCN (2011). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2011.1. www.iucnredlist.org (accessed June 21, 2011).
  15. Janson CH, Goldsmith ML (1995). Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behavioral Ecology 6: 326-336. External Resources
  16. Johns A, Skorupa J (1987). Responses of rain-forest primates to habitat disturbance: a review. International Journal of Primatology 8: 157-191. External Resources
  17. Koyama N, Shekar PB (1981). Geographic distribution of the rhesus and the bonnet monkeys in west central India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 78: 240-255.
  18. Kumara HN (2007). Impact of Local Hunting on Abundance of Large Mammals in Three Protected Areas of the Western Ghats, Karnataka. Final Technical Report submitted to Rufford Maurice Laing Foundation, UK. Bangalore, National Institute of Advanced Studies.
  19. Kumara HN, Singh M (2004). Distribution and abundance of primates in rain forests of the Western Ghats, Karnataka, India and the conservation of Macaca silenus. International Journal of Primatology 25: 1001-1018. External Resources
  20. Kumara HN, Kumar R, Singh M (2009). Of how much concern are the ‘least concern' species? Distribution and conservation status of bonnet macaques, rhesus macaques and Hanuman langurs in Karnataka, India. Primates 51: 37-42. External Resources
  21. Kumar R, Radhakrishna S, Sinha A (2011). Of least concern? Range extension by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) threatens long-term survival of bonnet macaques (M. radiata) in peninsular India. International Journal of Primatology 32:945-959. External Resources
  22. Molur S, Brandon-Jones D, Dittus W, Eudey A, Kumar A, Singh M (2003). Status of South Asian Primates: Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (CAMP) Workshop Report, 2003. Coimbatore, Zoo Outreach Organization/CBSG-South Asia.
  23. Pirta RS, Singh M (1978). Establishment of home range, intraspecific and interspecific relations in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) under infant-infant rearing conditions. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences - Section B, Animal Sciences, 87 (9), pp 267-278. External Resources
  24. Richard AF, Goldstein SJ, Dewar RE (1989). Weed macaques: the evolutionary implications of macaque feeding ecology. International Journal of Primatology 10: 569-594. External Resources
  25. Roonwal ML, Mohnot SM (1977). Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology, and Behavior. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  26. Singh M, Rao NR (2004). Population dynamics and conservation of commensal bonnet macaques. International Journal of Primatology 25: 847-859. External Resources
  27. Singh M, Erinjery J, Kavana T, Roy K, Singh M (2011). Drastic population decline and conservation prospects of roadside dark-bellied bonnet macaques (Macaca radiata radiata) of southern India. Primates 52: 149-154. External Resources
  28. Sinha A (2001). The bonnet macaque revisited: ecology, demography and behaviour. In ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Non-Human Primates of India (Gupta AK, ed.), vol 1, pp 30-39.
  29. Sinha A, Mukhopadhyay K, Datta-Roy A, Ram S (2005). Ecology proposes, behaviour disposes: ecological variability in social organization and male behavioural strategies among wild bonnet macaques. Current Science 89: 1166-1179. External Resources
  30. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. New York, Freeman.
  31. Southwick CH, Beg MA, Siddiqi MR (1961a). A population survey of rhesus monkeys in villages, towns and temples of northern India. Ecology 42: 538-547. External Resources
  32. Southwick CH, Beg MA, Siddiqi MR (1961b). A population survey of rhesus monkeys in northern India. II. Transportation routes and forest areas. Ecology 42: 698-710. External Resources
  33. Sterck EHM (1999). Variation in langur social organization in relation to the socioecological model, human habitat alteration, and phylogenetic constraints. Primates 40: 199-213. External Resources
  34. Sterck EHM, Watts DP, van Schaik CP (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41: 291-309. External Resources
  35. Terborgh J, Janson CH (1986). The socioecology of primate groups. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 111-136. External Resources
  36. Umapathy G, Kumar A (2000). The occurrence of arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the Anamalai Hills, south India. Biological Conservation 92: 311-319. External Resources
  37. Van Schaik CP (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems. Behaviour 85: 91-117. External Resources
  38. Van Schaik CP (1999). The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in orangutans. Primates 40: 69-86. External Resources
  39. Van Schaik CP, van Noordwijk MA (1988). Scramble and contest in feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behaviour 105: 77-98. External Resources
  40. Van Schaik CP, van Noordwijk MA, Boer RJ, Tonkelaar I (1983). The effect of group size on time budgets and social behaviour in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 13: 173-181. External Resources
  41. Wrangham RW (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262-300. External Resources

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: June 30, 2011
Accepted: May 08, 2013
Published online: September 10, 2013
Issue release date: October 2013

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0015-5713 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9980 (Online)

For additional information: [www.karger.com]


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. Top
Article Tools Article Details

2013, Vol.84, No. 6

October 2013

previous Article next

Recommend This

© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel

Karger International: COM | DE | CN

Switch to desktop view

About Us

Services

Resources