This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Award ceremony as an arbiter of commerce and canon in the popular music industry | Popular Music | Cambridge Core

Please note, due to scheduled maintenance online transactions will not be possible between 08:00 and 12:00 BST, on Sunday 17th February 2019 (03:00-07:00 EDT, 17th February, 2019). We apologise for any inconvenience

Skip to main content Accesibility Help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Cancel Log in × ×
  • Home
Popular Music
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kropf, Jonathan 2019. Digitale Bewertungspraktiken. p. 127.
    Braae, Nick 2018. Musical Anti-Virtuosity in New Zealand’s Nature’s Best. Popular Music and Society, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 176.
    Pallas, Josef Wedlin, Linda and Grünberg, Jaan 2016. Organizations, prizes and media. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 29, Issue. 7, p. 1066.
    Monteiro, Pedro and Nicolini, Davide 2015. Recovering Materiality in Institutional Work. Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 61.
    Cattani, Gino Ferriani, Simone and Allison, Paul D. 2014. Insiders, Outsiders, and the Struggle for Consecration in Cultural Fields. American Sociological Review, Vol. 79, Issue. 2, p. 258.
    Jeacle, Ingrid 2014. “And the BAFTA goes to […]”: the assurance role of the auditor in the film awards ceremony. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 27, Issue. 5, p. 778.
    Lussier, Martin 2014. ‘One for all …’: The case of the MIMIs awards and their exemplarity of Montréal's ‘musiques émergentes’. Popular Music, Vol. 33, Issue. 01, p. 129.
    Desler, Anne 2013. History without royalty? Queen and the strata of the popular music canon. Popular Music, Vol. 32, Issue. 03, p. 385.
    Baker, Sarah and Huber, Alison 2013. Locating the canon in Tamworth: historical narratives, cultural memory and Australia's ‘Country Music Capital’. Popular Music, Vol. 32, Issue. 02, p. 223.
    Moeran, Brian 2010. The book fair as a tournament of values. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 138.
    Kopiez, Reinhard Lehmann, Andreas C. and Klassen, Janina 2009. Clara Schumann's collection of playbills: A historiometric analysis of life-span development, mobility, and repertoire canonization. Poetics, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 50.
    Anand, N. and Jones, Brittany C. 2008. Tournament Rituals, Category Dynamics, and Field Configuration: The Case of the Booker Prize. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, Issue. 6, p. 1036.
    Lena, Jennifer C. and Peterson, Richard A. 2008. Classification as Culture: Types and Trajectories of Music Genres. American Sociological Review, Vol. 73, Issue. 5, p. 697.
    Google Scholar Citations

    View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

    Scopus Citations

    View all citations for this article on Scopus

  • Get access Add to cart USD25.00 Added An error has occurred,
    please try again later. Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register

Award ceremony as an arbiter of commerce and canon in the popular music industry


We show how the Grammy award ceremony played a central role in influencing the US popular music industry through two important inter-organisational processes. The ceremony served as the vehicle through which the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences (NARAS) interlinked with commercial interests in the field: the distributors, wholesalers and retailers who are represented by the National Association of Record Merchandisers (NARM). As music became a more visual medium and television coverage of the ceremony became prominent, merchandisers came to rely on the Grammy awards as their sales cue, and began to aggressively promote nominees and winners. As a result of the retailers' selective attention, Grammy award-winners began enjoying greater popular appeal through increased album sales. Second, attempts made by various constituents of NARAS to influence award decisions resulted in the surfacing of, challenges to and, finally, the resolution of occupational conflicts and normative concerns about the legitimacy of genres in the popular music industry. In the process, NARAS succeeded in championing the Grammy awards as the hallmark of peer recognition. We contend that the unique ability of the Grammy awards to mingle both peer and popular recognition makes them a significant arbiter of canon formation in the popular music industry.

    Copyright 2006 Cambridge University Press Recommend this journal

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

    Popular Music
    • ISSN: 0261-1430
    • EISSN: 1474-0095
    • URL: /core/journals/popular-music


    Full text views

    Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

    Total number of HTML views: 0 Total number of PDF views: 0 * Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.

    Total abstract views: 0 * Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed

    Cancel Confirm ×