This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

USDOJ: United States Files Complaint Against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. for Allegedly Paying Kickbacks to Doctors in Exchange for Prescribing Its Drugs

success fail Jan APR May 13 2013 2014 2015 33 captures 28 Apr 2013 - 05 Oct 2019 About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: National September 11 Memorial Museum National September 11 Memorial Museum

Archive-It Partner Since: Dec, 2007
Organization Type: Museums & Art Libraries
Organization URL:[]

The National September 11 Memorial Museum is committed to documenting the events, immediate aftermath, and continuing repercussions of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and February 26, 1993. To that end, the Memorial Museum's Web Archive seeks to identify and preserve web sites that reflect the international scope of this emergent history. These sites will be continually sourced from a wide variety of contributors, and will serve to reflect the full breadth of the post-9/11 world.

References to Institution as a partner on Internet Archive's Website shall carry no legal meaning and simply reflects Institution's status as a user of Internet Archive's Services pursuant to this Agreement.

Collection: National September 11 Memorial Museum this collection honors the nearly 3,000 victims of these attacks and all those who risked their lives to save others TIMESTAMPS Skip to main content | Skip to footer site map

  Home   »  Briefing Room   »  Justice News Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, April 26, 2013 United States Files Complaint Against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. for Allegedly Paying Kickbacks to Doctors in Exchange for Prescribing Its Drugs

The Justice Department announced today that the United States has filed a second civil false claims lawsuit against Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. involving alleged kickbacks paid by the company to health care providers.   The government’s complaint seeks damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act and under the common law for paying kickbacks to doctors to induce them to prescribe Novartis pharmaceutical products that were reimbursed by federal health care programs.   The lawsuit alleges that the payments violated the Anti-Kickback Statute and, as a result of Novartis’s unlawful conduct, the government paid false claims for reimbursement for Novartis pharmaceutical products.  

“Kickback schemes like those alleged in this case not only call into question the integrity of individual medical decisions, but they also raise the cost of health care for all of us,” said Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division.  “Patients deserve care based on a doctor’s sound medical judgment, not the doctor’s personal financial interest.  The Department of Justice will continue to pursue companies that use improper incentives, like those alleged here, to promote their products.”

 “As alleged, Novartis corrupted the prescription drug dispensing process with multi-million dollar ‘incentive programs’ that targeted doctors who, in exchange for illegal kickbacks, steered patients toward its drugs. And for its investment, Novartis reaped dramatically increased profits on these drugs, and Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal healthcare programs were left holding the bag, doling out millions of dollars in kickback-tainted claims,” said U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara. “Healthcare fraud imposes tremendous costs and causes great harm to an already burdened healthcare system, and the government will not tolerate it. The widespread kickback fraud alleged in our two lawsuits against Novartis – which only a few years ago settled a False Claims Act case involving violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute based on illegal payments to doctors – makes us question whether Novartis is getting the message.”

The following allegations are based on the government’s complaint filed in the Southern District of New York:

Novartis, a pharmaceutical company headquartered in East Hanover, N.J., is a subsidiary of Novartis AG, an international pharmaceutical company headquartered in Basel, Switzerland.   From January 2001 through at least November 2011, Novartis systematically violated the Anti-Kickback Statute , which prohibits the payment of remuneration to induce referrals of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally-funded programs.   Indeed, Novartis violated its own internal policies concerning speaker programs, which require that the programs have an educational purpose and that slides about the company’s drugs be presented.   Novartis violated the Anti-Kickback Statute by paying doctors to speak about certain drugs, including its hypertension drugs Lotrel and Valturna and its diabetes drug Starlix, at events that were often little or nothing more than social occasions for the doctors.   The payments and lavish dinners given to the doctors were, in reality, kickbacks to the speakers and attendees to induce them to write prescriptions for Novartis drugs.   In many instances Novartis made payments to doctors for purported speaker programs that either did not occur at all or that had few or no attendees, and thousands of programs were held all over the country at which few or no slides were shown and the doctors who participated spent little or no time discussing the drug at issue.

Many speaker programs were also held in circumstances in which it would have been virtually impossible for any presentation to be made, such as on fishing trips off the Florida coast.   Other Novartis events were held at Hooters restaurants.  

In connection with these programs, Novartis also frequently treated the doctors to expensive dinners that they hosted at high-end restaurants.   For example, a July 5 dinner for three, including the speaker, at a Washington, D.C. restaurant cost $2,016, or $672 per person. Novartis also paid a $1,000 honorarium to the speaker for this program.   One of the two attendees had attended the same program a short time earlier. At another program held on Valentine’s Day in 2006, Novartis paid $3,127, for a meal for two at a West Des Moines, Iowa restaurant, or $1,042 per person.                               

Novartis’s internal analyses show that speaker programs had a high return on investment in terms of the additional prescriptions for its drugs written by the doctors who participated in the programs, both as speakers and attendees, with the highest return arising from payments to doctors as “honoraria” for speaking.   In short, doctors increased the number of prescriptions they wrote when they were being paid by Novartis to speak about a drug.    As a result, Novartis spent millions on speaker programs yearly.   According to Novartis’s data, during the period from January 2002 through November 2011, it spent nearly $65 million and conducted more than 38,000 speaker programs for just three drugs:    the hypertension drugs, Lotrel and Valturna, and the diabetes drug, Starlix.   In the absence of a legitimate purpose for many of the programs, the payments were nothing more than kickbacks to the doctors that induced them to write prescriptions in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute .

Novartis was well aware that its speaker programs created opportunities to provide kickbacks to doctors.   In September 2010, Novartis entered into a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice to settle False Claims Act lawsuits based in part on violations of the AKS due to illegal remuneration paid to doctors through such mechanisms as speaker programs, and signed a corporate integrity agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General agreeing to implement a rigorous compliance program.  

Even after entering into the corporate integrity agreement, Novartis’s compliance program failed to prevent kickbacks from being paid in conjunction with Novartis’s speaker programs. No individual at the company was tasked with examining its speaker program data to determine whether the programs were used for an illegitimate purpose.   Furthermore, although instances of speaker program abuse were reported to Novartis, sanctions were generally mere slaps on the wrist.   In some cases, sales representatives who violated Novartis’s own speaker program policies were nevertheless promoted.   Even after September 2010, Novartis continued to conduct bogus speaker programs that were simply vehicles for paying kickbacks to doctors in the form of honoraria and expensive meals.

As a consequence of its violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute , Novartis has caused the submission of numerous false claims for drugs to federal health care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the Department of Veterans Affairs health care program, resulting in millions of dollars in reimbursements. Novartis’s unlawful conduct caused those false claims to be made to and paid by the federal health care programs.  


The complaint seeks treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act for the false claims for reimbursement for Lotrel, Valturna, and Stalix, as well as for other Novartis cardiovascular drugs.   In addition, the United States seeks damages under the common law.  

The complaint was filed in a lawsuit brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act by Oswald Bilotta, a former Novartis sales representative.   Under the Act’s qui tam provisions, a private citizen, known as a “relator,” can sue on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery.   The United States may join the lawsuit, as it has here.   The lawsuit is United States ex rel. Bilotta v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al., No. 11-cv-0071 (S.D.N.Y.).   The claims in the complaint filed by the government are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability.

On April 23, 2013, the United States filed a separate complaint in the Southern District of New York against Novartis, alleging that the company gave kickbacks, in the form of rebates and discounts, to pharmacies in exchange for the pharmacies’ agreement to switch transplant patients from competitor drugs to a Novartis product.   As here, that complaint seeks treble damages and civil penalties under the False Claims Act and remedies under the common law.  

This resolution is part of the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and another step for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced by Attorney General Eric Holder and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services in May 2009. The partnership between the two departments has focused efforts to reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through enhanced cooperation. One of the most powerful tools in that effort is the False Claims Act, which the Justice Department has used to recover more than $10.3 billion since January 2009 in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs. The Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 are over $14.2 billion.

13-481 Civil Division Department of Justice Accomplishments Open Government at the Department of Justice

Report a Crime

Get a Job

Locate a Prison, Inmate, or Sex Offender

Apply for a Grant

Submit a Complaint

Report Waste, Fraud, Abuse or Misconduct to the Inspector General

Find Sales of Seized Property

Find Help and Information for Crime Victims

Register, Apply for Permits, or Request Records

Identify Our Most Wanted Fugitives

Find a Form

Report and Identify Missing Persons

Contact Us

Site Map A to Z Index Archive Accessibility FOIA No FEAR Act Information Quality Privacy Policy Legal Policies & Disclaimers For Employees Office of the Inspector General Government Resources BusinessUSA ABOUT
The Attorney General Budget & Performance Strategic Plans

BUSINESS & GRANTS Business Opportunities Small & Disadvantaged Business Grants RESOURCES
Forms Publications Case Highlights Legislative Histories
NEWS Justice News The Justice Blog Public Schedule Videos Photo Gallery CAREERS
Legal Careers Interns, Recent Graduates, and Fellows Diversity Policy Veteran Recruitment