Inera Inc. - NLM DTD Resources

success fail Sep FEB May 19 2012 2013 2014 63 captures 13 May 2006 - 15 Feb 2017 About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: Internet Archive The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls. At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer. View the web archive through the Wayback Machine. Collection: Wide Crawl Started January 2013 Wide crawls of the Internet conducted by Internet Archive. Access to content is restricted. Please visit the Wayback Machine to explore archived web sites. TIMESTAMPS Innovative Software Solutions for Publishers    Learn how eXtyles is used
in scholarly publishing

>> Download here Inera brings you practical tips
for editing in Microsoft Word

>> Subscribe here NLM DTD Resources

Introduction

The NLM Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD Suite, co-authored by Inera Inc., Mulberry Technologies, and NCBI, is the de facto standard full-text DTD for scholarly publishing.

Since the DTD was first released in April 2003, it has been (for the scholarly publishing world) rapidly adopted. Whereas ISO 12083 never achieved broad acceptance, the NLM DTD has already been adopted by hundreds of journals (probably north of 500) worldwide. Many small and medium-sized publishers have adopted the NLM DTD, and a number of larger publishers are preparing to deliver content according to the NLM DTD when asked. Most of the major journal publishing compositors and service suppliers are up to speed on the DTD and happy to deliver content tagged with it.

The NLM DTD has also proven popular with aggregators. It is the "house" DTD of Atypon Systems and the recommended DTD for full-text content at Ingenta and Highwire Press. And, of course, NLM uses it for PubMed Central.

The NLM DTD has been no less popular with libraries. In a joint press release, the British Library and the Library of Congress announced that they would support the NLM DTD as their archiving standard for electronic content. It has also been adopted by Portico (a major Mellon-funded archive effort).

NLM DTD FAQ

Q: The DTD is from NLM. Isn't it just for life sciences content?

A: No. The DTD is designed for all scholarly content. The very first step in design of the DTD by the authors was to review a large number of journals published outside of life sciences (e.g., economics, physics, archeology, history, etc.). Based on this analysis, the DTD was developed to serve the entire scholarly publishing community.

Q: How easy is it to transform content from another STM DTD to the NLM DTD?

A: One of the design mandates for the NLM DTD project was to facilitate easy conversion of content from other DTDs to the NLM DTD. The DTD designers reviewed more than 35 journal publishing DTDs as part of their design work to ensure that content tagged in a wide variety of DTDs and styles could be transformed reliably to the NLM DTD.

Q: I have unusual semantic tagging requirements for my content. How can these requirements be accommodated in the NLM DTD?

A: The NLM DTD was designed in an open and modular fashion. In most cases, specific semantic requirements can be handled by the use of attributes within the DTD. For example, one publisher with botanic taxonomies completed the tagging quite easily by using the attributes provided within the definition list and named-content elements. However, if custom extensions are necessary, the DTD has also been built so that publishers can extend the DTD with new elements to meet their specific requirements without altering the core modules of the DTD.

Q: Are there any limitations on modifying the DTD?

A: No. The DTD is in the public domain and may be freely modified. However, most adopters of the DTD use it without modification, in part to facilitate content exchange with other publishers or archives.

Q: Where can I find the authoritative version of the DTD?

A: At [web.archive.org] and [web.archive.org]. The current version is 2.1. An FAQ with more information is available at [web.archive.org].

Q: What are the "blue" and "green" DTDs?

A: The NLM DTD is actually a suite of (now) three DTDs. The DTD developers recognized that in the world of publishing, one size would not fit all requirements, so two DTDs were developed from one core set of modules: "blue" (publishing) and "green" (archiving). The archiving DTD is less restrictive than the publishing DTD to meet the needs of archiving, which are often different from publishing requirements. More recently, NLM published a book version of the DTD in early 2005 designed for use by book publishers.

Q: Why a DTD and not W3C XML Schema or RelaxNG?

A: W3C XML Schema and RelaxNG versions are available from the NLM Web site. However, before jumping to use the Schema version, we recommend you read the section Why not use W3C XML Schema? in the NLM DTD FAQ hosted by NCBI.

Q: How is the DTD updated?

A: To keep the DTD relevant to the publishing and archiving communities, NLM has created the XML Interchange Structure Working Group. This group advises NLM on recommended changes in and/or additions to the tagset. NLM has contracted with Mulberry Technologies (of Rockville, MD) to act as Archiving and Interchange Tagset Secretariat. The Secretariat will collect the feedback to be discussed by the Working Group and will maintain the files and documentation. Feedback may be posted at [web.archive.org].

Q: Where did the NLM DTD come from?

A: The NLM Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD Suite was co-authored by Inera Inc., Mulberry Technologies, and NCBI. The foundations of the DTD can be found in the E-Journal Archive DTD Feasibility Study, a report prepared by Inera Inc. under a Mellon Foundation grant for the Harvard University Libraries that surveyed the DTDs of ten journal publishers.

Another useful Q&A; about the NLM Tag Suite is available on the Mulberry Technologies web site.

____________________________________

Inera, eXtyles, and refXpress
are registered trademarks
of Inera Inc.

Inera's Privacy Policy