success fail Jan FEB Mar 27 2008 2009 2010 199 captures 27 Feb 2009 - 29 Jul 2019 About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: Alexa Crawls Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period. Collection: alexa_web_2009 this data is currently not publicly accessible. TIMESTAMPSHOME / chatterbox: Gossip, speculation, and scuttlebutt about politics.
The Terrorists-Are-Dumb TheoryDon't mistake these guys for criminal masterminds.By Timothy NoahPosted Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2009, at 11:00 AM ET
This is the first in a series of eight essays exploring why the United States suffered no follow-up terror attacks after 9/11. To read the series introduction, click here.
The 9/11 attacks were heralded as the harbinger of a new era of foreign-based terrorism in the United States. What if they were really a fluke?DISCUSSE-MAILRSSSINGLE PAGE FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUpon
Al-Qaida's successful elimination of the Twin Towers, part of the Pentagon, four jetliners, and nearly 3,000 innocent lives makes the terror group seem, in hindsight, diabolically brilliant. But when you review how close the terrorists came to being exposed by U.S. intelligence, 9/11 doesn't look like an ingenious plan that succeeded because of shrewd planning. It looks like a stupid plan that succeeded through sheer dumb luck.
• Conspirator Khalid Almihdhar, who was (at least theoretically) under U.S. surveillance for his suspected role in the bombing of the USS Cole, aroused suspicion at a San Diego flight-training school with his impatient request that he be taught how to fly a Boeing jet. (On 9/11, Almihdhar would help crash American Flight 77 into the Pentagon, killing 189 people.)
• Another conspirator, Nawaf Alhazmi, aroused suspicion when he boasted to a fellow gas-station employee that he would become famous. (Alhazmi would go down with Almihdhar on Flight 77. For more on what the Federal Bureau of Investigation knew about Almihdhar and Alhazmi prior to 9/11, click here.)
• By late July, former Central Intelligence Agency chief George Tenet told the 9/11 Commission, "the system was blinking red," and earlier that same month, FBI special agent Kenneth Williams sent a memo from the Phoenix office to Washington noting "an inordinate number of individuals of investigative interest" attending flight school in Arizona. (To read the memo, click here.)
• In early August, President Bush received a classified daily brief famously titled "Bin Laden Determined To Strike in U.S." (To read it, click here.)
• Later in August, the FBI's Minneapolis office interrogated Zacarias Moussaoui, who had aroused suspicion at a Minnesota flight school by asking about New York City flight patterns and whether a jetliner's cockpit doors could be opened while it was airborne. (To read a summary of what the Minneapolis office knew as of Aug. 19, click here.) Moussaoui's recklessness and volatility made his al-Qaida superiors reluctant to use him in the 9/11 attack; he was likely being held in reserve for a future al-Qaida attack, or possibly as a backup pilot for 9/11.
• In trying to obtain a warrant to examine Moussaoui's laptop, a field officer in the FBI's Minneapolis office told FBI headquarters that he was "trying to keep someone from taking a plane and crashing into the World Trade Center." The FBI did not obtain the evidence of Moussaoui's al-Qaida link deemed necessary to obtain that warrant until two days after 9/11.
Nearly eight years after the attacks, it remains physically sickening to review these for-want-of-a-nail details about what the U.S. government knew prior to 9/11. The various intelligence agencies' failures to pool their knowledge about the plot should surprise no one familiar with Washington's bureaucratic culture. But it's equally true that to count on so extreme a degree of government dysfunction, as al-Qaida effectively did, was foolhardy in the extreme. The terrorists took an unacceptably high risk that they'd get caught, and, just barely, they beat the odds. That they succeeded does not prove they were smart to try.Page: 1 | 2SINGLE PAGE
E-mail Timothy Noah at .E-MAILRSS FacebookMySpace Mixx Digg Reddit del.icio.us Furl Ma.gnolia SphereStumbleUpon Timothy Noah is a senior writer at Slate. What did you think of this article? Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES SPONSORED CONTENT SPONSORED CONTENT More Chatterbox columns
- The Melting-Pot Theory
Why American Muslims don't blow things up.
Timothy Noah | Feb. 26, 2009
- Why No More 9/11s? Part 2
Is al-Qaida too preoccupied with Pakistan and Afghanistan to attack the United States?
Timothy Noah | Feb. 26, 2009
- The Near-Enemy Theory
Are Pakistan and Afghanistan preoccupying al-Qaida?
Timothy Noah | Feb. 26, 2009
- Search for more Chatterbox articles
- Subscribe to the Chatterbox RSS feed
- View our complete Chatterbox archive
TODAY'S HEADLINES FROM OUR PARTNER SITES:
- SBA's 'Goodwill' Cap Is Generating, Er, Ill Will
- Small Business Salon: Dan Ford, Community Banker
- In Which Your President Talks About You
- [audio] Fort Knox Receives 85 From Cash4Gold
- CIA Awkwardly Debriefs Obama On Creation Of Crack Cocaine
- Struggling Americans Forced To Work Extra-Dimensional 4th Shift
- Broad Blueprint a Risk Obama Is Willing to Take
- Budget Signals Priority Shift
- Senate Passes D.C. Voting Bill
- T-Shirts, Custom Jerseys, Barack Obama T-Shirts
- Equifax can help you monitor your credit. Learn more.
- Presidential Puppies: a Slide Show
- Why American Muslims Don't Join al-Qaida
- Crossing Over: They Don't Make Harrison Ford Movies Like They Used To
- Help! My Wife Wants To Sell Her Eggs To Get Us Through the Recession.
- I Need To Hire a Hit Man. How Much Is It Going To Run Me?
- Why the Coming Kindle Monopoly Is Bad News for the Book Industry
| | advertise | newsletters | mobile | make Slate your homepage
2009 Washington Post.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC