This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests - Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Undeletion requests(Redirected from Commons:UDELC) Jump to navigation Jump to search

Current requests[edit]

Shortcut: COM:UDR · COM:UDELC · COM:UNDELC

Request undeletion

  Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:

This is a dashboard widget. This is the template page where entries are added. Jump back to Commons:Undeletion requests for information and instructions. See also: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive. Closed requests will be archived after 8 hours. Currently 82 requests (2 waiting for archival).

Contents

Files of ArthurWeasley~commonswiki[edit]

Deletion of these files was incorrect and the deleted ones can be found at this link per COM:VPC#Category:Illustrations by Nobu Tamura.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

It seems most of these were deleted on the author's request for being inaccurate. So it could be argued these particular one should remain deleted for being out of scope. FunkMonk (talk) 12:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Right. Don't undelete own files nominated by ArthurWeasley~commonswiki for any type of deletion.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:46, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Please restore files uploaded by Catsquisher[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Numerous image files that I uploaded years ago have recently been deleted or are pending deletion. All of the images I’m referring to are from utility patents. When I posted the images years ago I used a licensing template that indicated that the drawings are in the public domain because the content of utility patents is typically not copyrightable. The template was later modified to claim that the exemption from copyrights only applies “to images published before March 1, 1989.” That change to the license template may be a reflection that the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals ruled in Yardley, 493 F.2d 1389 (C.C.P.A. 1974) that "Congress has not provided that an author inventor must elect between securing a copyright or securing a design patent." While the consequence of that ruling is that authors/inventors of design patents could assert copyrights on their designs, the ruling did not extend to utility patents. The ruling acknowledges that design patents are granted for the novelty of ornamental design (potentially copyrightable), whereas utility patents are granted based on functional novelty (not copyrightable). All of the patent drawing images I have uploaded are from utility patents that made no copyright claims, and are thus within the public domain. Therefore, I request that they be restored to the creative commons. Catsquisher (talk) 03:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

I think that you need to bring that up either on the talk page of the template, or on COM:Village pump/Copyright (or better bring it up on one and then link notify about it on the other). This isn't something that should be done on the file per file basis. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 09:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Postal. Please see COM:Village pump/Copyright#Reproductions_of_patent_text_and_illustrationsCatsquisher (talk) 20:17, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: @Hystrix, Josve05a: Most of these files were deleted as "out of scope" but they seem to be acceptable images, mostly of natural landmarks. They were indeed uploaded with the intent to promote tourism in Nigeria, but there is no conflict with our project scope. Also, the uploader has verified via OTRS their identity as a representative of the Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation, which should resolve most copyright concerns. Guanaco (talk) 17:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Restore Providing images and other media about tourism in any country is educational at its core. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 17:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Please see homepage of Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation [1], Point 3: “Unless expressly stated otherwise, you may not reproduce, modify, disseminate or otherwise exploit our Content in any way or form without our prior express approval. ... Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation trademarks and Tour Nigeria logos may only be used in conjunction with goods produced by Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation or with the express prior approval of Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation For the avoidance of doubt, the Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation corporate logo may only be used by Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation.” and also com:L and com:advert. --Hystrix (talk) 02:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Yes, but since the account is verified, dual-licensing applies and should be good. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:57, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
As for the mention of COM:advert it links to the section that the file must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Simply stating that something is an advertisement is not sufficient reason to delete it. That section is intended to say that advertisements are not automatically useful, not that they are automatically unuseful. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 11:32, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
@Guanaco: the e-mail to OTRS contains only the permission for the user account (NTDC). All photos are missing the name of the photographer. Some were previously published on Instagram. If NTDC is the rightholder, a permission must be shared for all photos. (Die E-Mail an OTRS enthält nur die Genehmigung für das User-Konto Nigerian Tourism Development Corporation (NTDC). Bei allen Fotos fehlt der Name des Fotografen. Einige wurden zuvor auf Instagram veröffentlcht. Wenn NTDC Rechteinhaber ist, muss eine Freigabe für alle Fotos erfolgen.) Hystrix (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
@Hystrix: These should be OK if they were not previously published elsewhere, or if the EXIF data is consistent. The logo should also be OK. That's the point to have a verified account. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
The logo is restored. However, the photos are so different that they probably come from different photographers or websites. There is currently no approval. EXIF data are not available on any photo. (Das Logo ist wiederhergestellt. Die Fotos allerdings sind so unterschiedlich, dass sie vermutlich von verschiedenen Fotografen oder Webseiten stammen. Es gibt derzeit keine Genehmigung. EXIF data sind bei keinem Foto vorhanden.) Hystrix (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unless the photographers are named (here or via OTRS).   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:13, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Корниловцы Владивосток 2.jpg[edit]

Прошу ответить мне, почему удален этот файл. Нарушение авторских прав? Надо сделать ссылку на сайт?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Спиридонов8 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) Please answer me why this file was deleted. Copyright violation? Need to make a link to the site?
 translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
@Спиридонов8: Вы не представили никакой лицензии. Какая лицензия подходит?
You presented no license. What license is appropriate?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Автор изображения разрешает использовать изображения с его сайта при наличии гиперссылки. Я в тексте ссылки поставил, так что использовать можно это изображение по Свободной лицензии.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Спиридонов8 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Здравствуйте, на Викискладе недостаточно, чтобы файл можно было использовать и распространять при соблюдении какого-либо условия (например предоставления ссылки на источник), также необходимо, чтобы любой человек имел возможность изменять и распространять файл (в том числе в коммерческих целях). Пердоставляет-ли данное право автор этого файла? ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 15:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Akbansel[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Deletion request included statement that no proof of ownership was provided. Ownership attestation was submitted as part of the upload process, as is standard.

In terms of the assertion that the images are advertisements, the placement of all images was contextually appropriate, adding illustrative value. The item in the images is unique, so it necessarily will be identifiable... it's not akin to uploading a generic item and specifying the brand. However, to minimize the "advertisement" aspect, I removed all website links, if such links were present, and removed references to the product name in the descriptions.

Finally, I created a discussion about this deletion request and gave the reasons listed above. Wikimedia's deletion policy states:

The file/page may be deleted on decision by an admin if there were good reasons given in the debate for doing so.

It also states:

Administrators closing deletion requests are expected to provide adequate explanation for their decision.

I reviewed the talk pages and the deletion log, and can't find any reason given by the deleter. I respectfully request undeletion, or if not, at least a review of the deletion criteria and an explanation of why the deletion was valid. Akbansel (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - nomination reason in the DR is clear enough. This is an advertisement and also there is no evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 23:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question When you say «Ownership attestation was submitted as part of the upload process, as is standard.» do you mean that you have followed COM:OTRS?  Comment If you did, I believe that we need to restore. Showing anything can be an advertisement for that item. I think that the no-advertising policy clearly was intended to stop textual images with prices and other nonsense like that, not to stop companies releasing the images of their products under the free licence. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 09:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Aspahbod[edit]

In the deletion request here a person said that "No indication of own work on any of these" images, but the user's page on English wikipedia [2] shows they claimed them as own work and have a consistent artistic style. (A few images survived the deletion request because they were uploaded first to WP, then to commons by other users).

Streamline8988 (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Restore per nomination ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 09:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aspahbod. Please send the permission and the original, unretouched, high resolution photos with intact EXIF metadata via OTRS for verification.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
    • The files in question are CGI images uploaded in the PNG format. They don't have EXIF. I'm also not the user who created them. Streamline8988 (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Pinging @Aspahbod.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
  •  Restore for evaluation. Images like w:File:Mohajer_2.PNG are obviously not photographic. Jeff_G.’s “original, unretouched…” are risible and demonstrate poor knowledge of computer graphics. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
See "pictures" at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aspahbod. If these are not pictures, they should be in svg format.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Lung capacity measures.png (formerly File:Lung.png)[edit]

A diagram from 2007 speedily deleted and replaced with redirect (emphasis for Yann) to a worse image uploaded in 2014 by a single-purpose account. Rationale provided by Túrelio is wrong – Lung.png is the source of Ký_hiệu_dùng_trong_hô_hấp_2014-03-03_00-06.png, not its derivative. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ký hiệu dùng trong hô hấp 2014-03-03 00-06.png for details. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Mariohsmarino2.jpg[edit]

Esta foto es de mi propiedad y del Dr. Mario Mariño, mi cuñado y amigo, el cual ha prestado a diferentes medios para difusión, tanto de los Premios Konex como en difersos sitios académcios y científicos. No reconomos, ni yo ni el Dr. Mario Mariño, esta decisión de borrar esta fotografia de nuestra propiedad. Contamos con el archivo original en alta definición, situación que demuestra el verdadero poseedor y autoria del material fotográfico

— Preceding unsigned comment added by ERodLeir (talk • contribs) 19:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

File:앞산전망대.jpg[edit]

those pictures are free copyright pictures, those are from Daegu City, and Daegu City permit use it as the Korea pubilc certificate it call 공공누리. and also i have been got OTRS with 공공누리 when i edit 대구광역시, so i think it is not wrong about my upload (talk) 03:37, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment 공공누리 does appear to be a valid free licence. I cannot see the pictures, so I can say nothing else. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
    •  Restore If all the files are like File:스파밸리.jpg then they are freely licenced. Tineye shows no other uses. However, the licence is 공공누리 and not CC-BY-SA 4.0, so it needs to be templatised and and properly stated. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
      •  Restore I mean is that It is only used in korea, and also i have got OTRS before, I think u can see the file 'File:동대구역.jpg' that i got OTRS with the '공공누리' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxpooun (talk • contribs) 09:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Received an OTRS ticket, but non-government-controlled email address asserting government agent. Directed them to re-send using Government email address. The license in permission ticket was CC BY SA 4.0 Intl, not {{KOGL}}. — regards, Revi 10:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Lettera Boratto p2.JPG[edit]

Please compare to File:Lettera Boratto p1.JPG which still exisit on the commons. Evrik (talk) 17:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

File:সিরাজুদ্দিন কাশেমপুরী.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: He is my grandfather and I am writing about him in Wiki. But he has only one image. He died 32 years before. Riyadhtayf (talk) 03:34, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Riyadhtayf: I oppose restoration of this file, copied from [bn.banglapedia.org] , because it has no permission from the photographer. Please have the photographer or heirs send permission via OTRS with a copy to you. Alternatively, please have the subject or his heirs send copies of the written copyright transfer agreements between them and yourself with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:42, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Willem van Waning (1897-1968).jpg[edit]

I took and modified this photo from [3]. It is said in their copyright page, [4], that Verder geldt dat de auteurswet niet van toepassing is op materiaal afkomstig van de overheid, mits het auteursrecht uitdrukkelijk is voorbehouden. Roughly translated in English as "Furthermore, the copyright law does not apply to material originating from the government, provided that the copyright is expressly reserved." (My apology that i don't speak Dutch) Since this photo is a work of the city government of Leek, could this photo is considered copyright-free? Any help from Dutch users here would be really appreciated, Thank you. Afrogindahood (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment I do not see any statement, however, that all the photos there are the work of government. In fact on many of them it lists specific photographer. Since I do not know which specific photo it is, I am unable to comment further. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 16:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

World War I posters...[edit]

Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_on_User:Martin_H./World_War_I_posters_in_the_Library_of_Congress_for_jpg_file_matches_to_"Rehse-Archiv" Please restore these posters by Alfred Offner, who died in 1947. They would now be public domain in the European Union. Obviously, they're PD-1923.

Pinging @: as a courtesy Abzeronow (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment @Abzeronow: I've restored the first one. I haven't found Offner's signature in the other two (for now). Strakhov (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, The way it was grouped in the DR made me think Offner was author of the second and third one. Apologies for the mistake on my part. Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The third one is composed by two posters (only text...), both stating at the bottom something like „R. HELAEZ MÜNCHEN“ „D. RELAEZ. MÜNCHEN“ „R. HELAEZ MÜNCHEN“. „R. KELLER. MÜNCHEN“ or „R. HELLER. MÜNCHEN“. I cannot say. Strakhov (talk) 16:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
{{PD-text}}? [www.loc.gov] Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment The second one includes at the bottom right corner a monogram including at least the letter „T“, I think. Strakhov (talk) 17:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Looking at Kohle ist Brot,[5] neither the Library of Congress, nor the Imperial War Museum have been able to identify the author, or interpret the monogram. All credible sources we can find seem to show the artist as "unknown" and credibly is unknowable. If the artist may or may not be Alfred Offner, the evidence seems sufficient, under a reasonable interpretation of German law, to find the work insufficiently attributed to have any potential claim of copyright. Just my 2c worth. -- (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
If {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} applies, then it could be undeleted. Otherwise, we might have to wait until approx. 2040 for it to age into {{PD-old-assumed}}. Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  • (edition conflict) Well, I'm a fool. I can show you the links. You can check yourself:
Kohle ist Brot LCCN2004666178.jpg
Die Kriegsgefangenen kommen! ... Lassen wir sie nicht im Stich! LCCN2004666182.jpg
Strakhov (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Makes sense, thanks. I do not know where that might leave a potential rationale for "unknown". -- (talk) 17:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg[edit]

File:Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg; you have deleted this image I have uploaded as an illustration in my project of contribution "Nathalie Ros" because you have found it on a website (Koufa Foundation) and thought there was a copyright violation. I have taken this picture myself and I offered it to Nathalie Ros in order for her to use it in her CV; I am the autor and not Koufa Foundation that has no copyright on this image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagrimardière (talk • contribs) 2018-10-31 10:00:00 (UTC)
@Tuvalkin: I can't see it. It's redeleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Indded. Maybe I managed to glimpse it before its actual deletion, or was it redeleted. Eitherway, here’s the UDEL request, based on COM:AGF, if possible. -- Tuválkin 19:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Turns out I might have glimpsed it as re-uploaded. Eitherway, it should be undeleted. -- Tuválkin 17:16, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Question @Lagrimardière: Es que c’est possible de faire apparaitre dans un page ouaibe officielle de la Professeur Ros (et/ou bien ici) une declaration informant que l’auteur de cette photo c’est l’utilisateur Wikimedia Lagrimardière, que a le droit de la licenser comme CC-BY-SA? Ça eteait le plus simple. -- Tuválkin 19:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:"Superweib im Märchenwald", 2012.jpg[edit]

Hallo, ich erkläre in Bezug auf die Bilder, dass ich »Hella de Santarossa«, die Inhaberin/den Inhaber eines vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechtes, rechtmäßig vertrete.

Der Fotograf des Bildes heißt Hella de Santarossa. Der Künstler des Werkes ist Hella de Santarossa die mir ihre Erlaubnis erteilt hat.

Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung der Bilder unter der freien Lizenz »Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, die Bilder (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die die Bilder im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass die Bilder dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt werden.

Die Künstlerin hat mit die Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung dieser und aller auf Ihrer Wikipedia-Seite ersichtlichen Bilddateien erteilt. Dies gilt für diese Datei sowie für die folgenden:

File:Kopie von 1+1+1=1, Lichtinstallation, zur Ökomenischen Kirchen Tag.jpg

File:Expo 2000 in Hannover – Marienfenster im Christus-Pavillon.jpg

File:Simon-Petrus Kirche in Bremen-Habenhausen.png

File:Hella De Santarossa (Mitte), Hausbesetzung mit J. Beuys.png

File:2013 Restaurierung des Bilfries im Reichstag,Fraktionsraum der SPD.jpg

File:Ausstellungsplakat Fahrradbilder.jpg

File:Performance „Rogenhaut“, 1984.png

File:Expo 2000, Marienfenster, Hella Santarossa .png

Gern kann ich Ihnen Email-Verläufe weiterleiten, aus denen hervorgeht, das Mir die Künstlerin explizit für diesen Zweck die Dateien zur Verfügung gestellt hat. In diesem Zusammenhang verweise ich auch auf meine E-Mail Anfrage an das Support - Team (Vorgangs-Nummer: 2287-e97c789db77a56c7) die sich ebenso auf die Freischaltung der Bilddateien bezieht. Herzlichen Dank Schrippchen (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Boris Lobanov.jpg[edit]

The main reason lies in my forgetting to note that the photo had been already published on the Internet page ([ssrlab.by]). The photo was uploaded there on July 23, 2007. The photo represents my own work. Could it be restored for this reason? SSR Lab (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

@SSR Lab: Do you already have an OTRS ticket in which we accepted your relationship with ssrlab.by? If not, please send one or indicate that relationship on that site and point us to that indication.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Н.В. Рязанцева.jpg[edit]

That media used to be published at [www.krskstate.ru] when Ryazanceva was Deputy Prime Minister of Krasnoyarsk Krai. The picture also published in mass media: [www.trk7.ru]Ab067 (talk) 02:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@Ab067: Hello, Unfortunately Russia does not have the same legal stance when it comes to the works by the government as the United States. In Russia only laws, the documents, and a few other creations of the government are considered to be in public domain, all other works can be copyrighted. You can look at {{PD-RU-exempt}} for the list of what government works you can upload under the public domain. Therefore in this case the copyright owner is either the photographer oneself or the Office of Governor of Krasnoyarskiy kray (if they transferred the copyright). While there is an exemption in Russian law for educational purposes, such mandatory licences are not allowed on Commons. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 04:56, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Marek Michalak and Tymon Radzik.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file shouldn't have been deleted as it is not a copyright violation. It is an official material and therefore, by the law of the Republic of Poland, it belongs to public domain. Please note, the photo has been published in .gov.pl domain (governmental domain extension). It has been misleadingly marked as copyright protected by some newspapers, which used it. These newspapers could use it without mentioning the original author only because it's an official material. Rembertow02 (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Haldjad ooperist Midsummernights Dream Madis Nurms.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It has been tagged with {{npd}} by User:Mitte27 most probably by mistake (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carmen Finale.jpg as another example). It has a valid OTRS ticket (ticket:2009122810016222). If there is any issue with this file, it should be clearly explained in a regular DR. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

The same story for the following files:

4nn1l2 (talk) 01:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC) 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose - I don't think these OTRS tickets should ever have been accepted. The permission comes from the organizer of the event, apparently not from the photographers. Jcb (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
I added five other files to the list. Each file should be evaluated separately, preferably in a regular DR. For example, see ticket:2009122810016357 in which the customer has stressed they are both the designer and the photographer. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Yes, maybe one or two files can be saved. But most of the files have no valid permission. Also many deleted uploads of this uploader had no OTRS ticket at all. Jcb (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Generałowie podczas Święta Wojska Polskiego 2007.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The license was valid. The photo was taken in 2007 and the licensor's license terms for photos from MON were changed in September 2013. There's more photos taken by MON on Commons. File:Gen. Marek Dukaczewski.JPG, and File:Jarosław Kraszewski.JPG were uploaded in January 2018. Both files were kept after starting the deletion request. User:Nemo5576/MON doesn't specify if the license is valid for files uploaded to Commons or MON before September 2013. Photos taken by MON before September 2013 don't mention their authors. ElCet (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Tontonyua[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: These files are all inseparable and extremely important part of Beijing City Overall Plan (2016-2035) and Beijing City Overall Plan (2004-2020) announced by People's Government of Beijing Municipality. According to Article 5 of Copyright Law of People's Republic of China, as well as Article 9 of Urban and Rural Planning Law of People's Republic of China ("All units and individuals shall abide by the urban and rural planning approved and announced in accordance with the law, ..."), these files are out of copyright protection. Where are copyright violations? WQL (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

  • @Shizhao, Jcb: Pinging sysops concerned. --WQL (talk) 14:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
    •  Oppose - We do not work for the Chinese government. I see no valid reason why these files would be PD. None of the reasons for {{PD-PRC-exempt}} applies. Jcb (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose How can urban planning law make something public domain? ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 06:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
    • @Jcb, Gone Postal: Because in China, all plans are enforced according to these texts and maps in the plan. Government shall enforce the plan in reference of these maps according to the planning law. And, in many time, maps are the ONLY legal reference. So, these maps have an obvious administrative nature, and are not subject to copyright, which meets the criterion of "resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs". --WQL (talk) 07:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
      • Ok, that sounds reasonable, but I do not know enough about China's law to say more. There was that case where annotated legal documents were judged as public domain in the USA even though they were created by the private entity[1], so this is not unreasonable to believe that something that appears not to be "law" is still in public domain. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 10:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
        • In fact, all content created by government with administrative nature to all people are in public domain, and all these maps have this nature. In the letter Reply of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council on the "Beijing Urban Master Plan (2016-2035)", the State Council said, "XIII. (The Beijing Municipal People's Government shall) [R]esolutely safeguard the seriousness and authority of the plan. The "Master Plan" is the basic basis for the development, construction and management of urban areas in Beijing. It must be strictly implemented. No department or individual may arbitrarily modify or violate regulations." Also, if there are any parts that are not covered in the planning text, planning maps shall be followed as the only reference. --WQL (talk) 11:45, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
          • I disagree that these maps would be documents with an administrative nature. They are also derivative works of maps that are unsourced and probably not in the Public Domain. Jcb (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
          • I have given sources in this request before (repeat them again:Beijing City Overall Plan (2016-2035) and Beijing City Overall Plan (2004-2020)), and I affirm that my view is right. Also, in China there is no doubt that all government planning documents' copyrights held by the government. WQL (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
            •  Support This appears to be a benefit to us of China's system of government.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
            • copyrights held by the government ≠ public domain (in China). and see [6]: "以北京市城市规划设计研究院、中国城市规划设计研究院、清华大学三家研究单位牵头,30个国家级和市级权威机构、近200名专家学者参与了研究工作。",很难说这些文件与图表全部都属于PD(特别是政府完全可以以行政司法名义合理使用受著作权保护的作品)--shizhao (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
              • 或许我们也得看是相关机构做了这些工作是为了谁。您看,此类大型规划,政府必须向符合一级城乡规划资质的机构公开招标,同时也一定会拨给一定款项,所以我基于这一原因也相信政府拥有相关版权。--WQL (talk) 13:50, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. [www.youtube.com]

File:印军越界现场照片(一).png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: These files are all inseparable part of The fact that the Indian border guards crossed the border into the Chinese territory in the Sikkim section of the Sino-Indian border and China’s position(《印度边防部队在中印边界锡金段越界 进入中国领土的事实和中国的立场》), a diplomatic statement announced by The Department of Foreign Affairs, People's Republic of China. According to Article 5 of Copyright Law of People's Republic of China,, these files are out of copyright protection. Also, a part of vandalism of INeverCry. WQL (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Support per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. Why there pics is "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature"?--shizhao (talk) 02:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
    • It's an original (author: a part of PLA, affilated to Chinese Government) and indispensible part of a diplomatic statement, which clearly shows its administrative in nature. --WQL (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Teatro de Hierápolis, Pamukkale Theater 10216841227333395o.jpg 2[edit]

In Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-11#File:Teatro de Hierápolis, Pamukkale Theater 10216841227333395o.jpg, I asked DIEGO73 to overwrite the file in full size with EXIF metadata intact per COM:HR.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Done. Type/Size/Px/Ppp DIEGO73 (talk) 03:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
@DIEGO73: By "overwrite", I meant for you to use the link "Upload a new version of this file".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Beegees lifeinatincan reinterpreted.jpg[edit]

hello,

I'm seeking to reinstate my upload [by you].

It seems the reason it was deleted is because I incorrectly claimed the modified album cover as my own. I did not realise at the time that the original cover would still hold copyright, and thus chose the wrong option.

Is it possible to reinstate the image with the appropriate credit? I am not sure which license is applicable here, but certainly I do think the image is not violating any such copyrights if I give credit.

I would be happy to amend the caption of the image in order to assert the credit belongs to the Bee Gees, as I think that would be the missing requirement that necessitated the deletion.

Please advise.


Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LifeInATinCan (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @LifeInATinCan: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, RSO Records or an heir, successor or assign probably still owns the copyright for that album cover.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:51, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Pauli Heikkilä - Tampere - 26.10.2005.jpg[edit]

I'm the photographer of this portrait and therefore also the copyright owner. I was requested to upload it myself because previous version which was uploaded by a person to whom I gave my permission to use it here was deleted. I accepted that this portrait is licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0. What did I do wrong?

--Zabex (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

The other user who uploaded the photo was asked to use Commons:OTRS to verify the license. You can do that as well. Thuresson (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

I sent official release of rights statement to Finnish OTRS ([email protected]). --Zabex (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

@Zabex: Unfortunately, that queue is backlogged 294 days.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Oh my God! I need it much faster ... Is there any way to speed up the process? If I publish this image under a domain owned by me with correct license information, is that enough? The backlog of English OTRS is quite long too, I assume? --Zabex (talk) 06:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
En queue is 170 days. I see the ticket in the fi queue Ticket:2018110510009544. I can tell you now that a gmail e-mail address is going to be a stumbling block - the whole purpose is to validate that the permission is correct, anyone can create any unused gmail address in seconds - your best option might be to put it on your web site (add the logo from [creativecommons.org]) so long as that web site can be properly traced to you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Ok then. If I'll register a fresh new .fi-domain and put this image under it with correct lisence is that proof enough? Finnish Communications Regulatory Authory verifies me when allocating domain to a private person (via my Finnish personal identification number). The owner of the domain in the whois-database will be me (Petri Sabel). --Zabex (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: The 300 day backlog doesn't meant that it takes that long to solve new tickets in the Finnish queue. Maybe there is one problematic ticket that has been abandoned and it makes the backlog seem so long. Unfortunately there is only one Finnish user handling the queue, so it depends on how he has time to check it. -kyykaarme (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gabriella Crespi photographed by her son Gherardo Crespi in 1970.jpg[edit]

The author itself released the licensing. You can find it here.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenzo Mattiello (talk • contribs) 11:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File:La torre Embriaci.JPG[edit]

It appears that this file was deleted because the top of the tower was cut. Category:Torre_Embriaci does have a number of depictions of this building, but I don't think this particular picture is too bad even if the top is not fully depicted. You could argue it shows more of the bottom instead. whym (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Lorena Bernal.jpg[edit]

To whom it may concern,

I would like to ask for the permission to publish the attached photo. I'm the owner of the photo. Here I send you the copyright permission. It has been deleted previously because it really hard for me to understand all the instructions. I hope everything is correct now. If not, please let me know what else I can do.

Best regards Beatriz Rodriguez

To whom it may concern

I hereby affirm that I Beatriz Rodriguez , the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here: in the attached images and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Beatriz Rodriguez

Copyrigth holder 08/11/2018 --BeatrizRodriguezTIK (talk) 11:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Максим Кучеренко.jpg[edit]

Прошу срочно восстановить удаленную "по подозрению " в неправильном использовании личную фотографию Максима Кучеренко. Фото принадлежит мне.

Комментарии по английски я не понимаю,даже через гугл переводчик, в связи с чем прошу ответить мне на русском языке, почему я не могу использовать фотографию Максима Кучеренко для оформления личной страницы Максима Кучеренко??

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Тётя Юля (talk • contribs) 14:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Planetshakers band en concierto en vivo.jpg[edit]

No estoy de acuerdo que se me haiga borrado esa imagen, puesto que lo tengo desde hace dos años desde el 2016 que yo lo subi esa foto y no tuve problemas porque fue por creación propia, no viole los derechos de autor porque esa imagen nunca fue subida al facebook como lo afirma el usuario que lo nomino para el borrado. Considere mi petición de poder restaurarla mi imagen. Por favor considera mi petición. Bendiciones. Chico sensación (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:SanDiegoChickenByPhilKonstantin.jpg[edit]

SanDiegoChickenByPhilKonstantin.jpg - I do not understand why the photo was removed. It is my personal photo. I took it myself. It is not a screen shot, or copy of anyone else's work. Ted came by the TV station where I worked at the time KUSI. I took the photo then. Look at all of the photos I have posted on my user page to confirm I did work there, and I took photos of lots of famous people.

[en.wikipedia.org]

Here is what is listed on the former photo: File:SanDiegoChickenByPhilKonstantin.jpg From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Jump to navigationJump to search This page has been deleted. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 14:22, 2 December 2016 Jameslwoodward (talk | contribs) deleted page File:SanDiegoChickenByPhilKonstantin.jpg (per Commons:Deletion requests/Mascotts in de.wp) (thank) (global usage; delinker log) No file by this name exists, but you can upload it.

Phil Konstantin Philkon (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose There was no doubt that you took the photo, but the chicken costume itself is copyrighted and non-free. Therefore we cannot host such images without permission from the copyright holder of the mascot. Please see our notes on derivative works. De728631 (talk) 17:17, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:BASS & FLINDERS POINT - Official point - Cronulla - Syd - nSW (22.07.2018).jpg[edit]

Please restore this file because its my own work and wasn't available on any sites other than Wikimedia Commons --HutheMeow (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Matthew Flinders - Inscript - Cronulla - Syd - nSW (23.07.2018).jpg [edit]

Please restore this file because its my own work and hasn't been available on any sites other than Wikimedia Commons --HutheMeow (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Mercedes de Vega 2015, Feria del Libro de Madrid.jpg[edit]

Solicito la recuperación de mi archivo fotográfico: Mercedes de Vega 2015, Feria del Libro de Madrid.jpg Este archivo es de mi propiedad en exclusiva. Sin derechos cedidos a terceros. Espero que pronto lo restituyan. Gracias,

Mercedes de Vega

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercedesdevega (talk • contribs) 09:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

El archivo es de mi propiedad y mantengo todos sus derechos en exclusiva. Ruego su restauración

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercedesdevega (talk • contribs) 10:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Dhaan Mandi.png[edit]

I am the creator of this logo.

I have rights to use it on wikimedia and wikipedia.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyofjawad (talk • contribs) 05:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose Out of scope unless en:Draft:Dhaan Mandi is approved. Thuresson (talk) 11:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

File:461472 144118915720601 141251566007336 176409 1205232217 o.jpg[edit]

The file was deleted by User:JurgenNL for having no permission. However, it is found on English Wikipedia as en:File:Whangarei airport upgrade.jpg with sufficient author and permission information. Therefore the file can be considered to be undeleted. (But anyways, major cleanup and renaming process is needed.)廣九直通車 (talk) 07:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

 Info Uploaded to Commons on May 17, 2012, deleted on January 16, 2014, uploaded to en: on June 6, 2014. Thuresson (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
@ThuressonThank you.Then how can I transfer the file to Commons without using Commons Helper? It just returned that the file was uploaded to Commons previously but was deleted here.(ERROR: Warning duplicate-archive : 461472_144118915720601_141251566007336_176409_1205232217_o.jpg)廣九直通車 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
You have asked for the file to be undeleted. If the file is OK an administrator will undelete it. Thuresson (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Сипягин В.В..png[edit]

глупое основание для удаления - использование этой фото на регнуме, где указано, что АП принадлежат мне АнатоликДАМ (talk) 08:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:20 xu mặt trước.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per this DR: Commons:Deletion_requests/Banknotes_of_Vietnam2, Vietnamese currency is publication + 50. These banknotes were published in 1966 and are public domain in Vietnam Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

@Abzeronow: Are they PD in the US? If so, why?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:41, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Why would US copyright matter when copyright holder would have been the State Bank of Vietnam? Other UDRs of currency that has expired copyright in their country of origin have ignored any potential URAA issue. Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 Support This type of legal tender was certainly avaible in the US exchange booths within 30 days after its first issue in Vietnam, so US copyright provisions would apply. However, as there is no copyright notice (see also File:20 xu mặt sau.jpg for comparison), it is a case of {{PD-US-no notice}}. De728631 (talk) 18:20, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Would availability in United States exchange booths count as publication in the United States? It sounds like the same situation as a bookshop which sells foreign imported books. Anyway, money is probably often published in local information material long before entering circulation.
Also, why are references made to URAA? If they were published in 1966, then they were already in the public domain in Vietnam on the URAA date in 1998 (if the correct copyright term is 50 years from publication - {{PD-Vietnam}} suggests life+50 years). --Stefan2 (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
It's possible that the template has an omission. Other DRs of Vietnamese currency basically used publication + 50 as the baseline (this DR from 2011 Commons:Deletion requests/Banknotes of Vietnam said "Per Commons:Currency#Vietnam and List of countries' copyright length, coins and banknotes from Vietnam printed/made after Jauary 1, 1961 are copyrighted. " DR for these two files (in 2012) said "Per Commons:Currency#Vietnam and List of countries' copyright length, coins and banknotes from Vietnam printed/made after Jauary 1, 1962 are copyrighted.") Abzeronow (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The quote states that banknotes which are more recent than 50 years are copyrighted. It does not necessarily mean that earlier banknotes are in the public domain. The user who wrote that could just have assumed that no banknotes were published after the death of the artist, or the user may have had author death information which was not stated there. For example, all Swedish pre-1916 coins are, to my knowledge, PD-old-100. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Lamentation of Christ - Niccolò dell'Arca.jpg[edit]

My own original work - both photos and collage. Provides a helpful overview of the terracotta group. I agree to free public use.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipub (talk • contribs) 08:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
@Wikipub: What about the sculptures? They seem to be old enough to be out of copyright, but we would need to know the original artist. If the sculptor is unknown, please tell us the period of time when the sculptures were made. De728631 (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
PS: Niccolò dell'Arca died in 1494, so the sculptures are free of copyright.  Support undeletion. De728631 (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
 Support since sculptures seem to have been in public domain for a very long time now. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your support - where do I go from here? I just want to make public (free public domain) the photo collage of Nicolò dell'Arca's (ca. 1435 - 1494) Compianto sul Cristo morto (Lamènt sül Crìst Mort - Lamentation of Christ) from the Santuario di Santa Maria della Vita ([en.wikipedia.org]).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipub (talk • contribs) 11:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Just be a little more patient. This process can take a while. Abzeronow (talk) 15:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Kyaik Htee Saung Pagoda.jpg[edit]

My wife originally tried to upload this photo on my behalf from her Wiki account but it was taken down because she was not the original photographer. I am the original photographer and opened this account in order to upload it myself. I used the same file she used, so it was automatically recognized and marked for deletion. I am the photographer. I permit this photo to be used on Wikipedia.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ye Myat Tun, Discover Myanmar (talk • contribs) 03:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Belu Gurading Kyaik Htee Saung.jpg[edit]

My wife originally tried to upload this photo on my behalf from her Wiki account but it was taken down because she was not the original photographer. I am the original photographer and opened this account in order to upload it myself. I used the same file she used, so it was automatically recognized and marked for deletion. I am the photographer. I permit this photo to be used on Wikipedia.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ye Myat Tun, Discover Myanmar (talk • contribs) 03:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Planetshakers band en concierto en vivo.jpg[edit]

Foto borrada sin motivo y sin sustento. Soy el propietario de los derechos de autor de esta imagen. Por favor restauren la foto. Muchas gracias.Chico sensación (talk) 04:27, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Ранко Кеча.jpg, File:Гордана Ковачек Станић.jpg, File:Јелена Видић-Трнинић.jpg, File:Атила Дудаш.jpg,FileМарко Кнежевић.jpg,File:Слободан Орловић.jpg,File:Зоран Лончар.jpg,File:Гордана Дракић.jpg,File:Наташа Деретић.jpg,File:Антун Маленица.jpg,File:Милана Писарић.jpg,File:Драго Дивљак.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following images with valid OTRS permissions :

Reason: I have received erroneous advice. Now it's clear to me that I should not tag the files as {OTRS received}.
ID007NS (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 173 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 17:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Affiche sweetcocoon.png[edit]

Bonjour je fais cette demande au sujet du fichier File:Affiche sweetcocoon.png, que j'ai ajouté une première fois, et qui a été supprimée. J'ai suivi la procédure, et ai demandé au détenteur des droits d'auteur de donner son accord express pour la publication de ce document sur wikimedia commons. Cette requête a bien été envoyée le 19/10/2018 dernier, par mail de la part de [email protected] à permissions-f[email protected] Sur la base de ces informations, pourriez-vous réhabiliter le document ? Merci par avance de votre retour --Lindaz818 (talk) 08:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

@AntonierCH: pourrais-tu regarder si l'autorisation convient ? VIGNERON (talk) 10:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
@VIGNERON: Permission reçue - 2018101910005541, cependant il y en a d'autres à traiter avant (backlog d'une centaine de jours que je suis en train de clearer cette semaine). Si je regarde la permission, elle semble ok, mais il faut encore qu'on fasse les vérifications d'usage pour voir si écoles créatives peut raisonnablement être l'auteur de ces médias. --AntonierCH (d) 10:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daeger-Gregori.jpg[edit]

Used under permission by the author, Andreas Günter. "hiermit gebe ich das foto für jedwede verwendung gerne frei, auch zur nutzung in wikipedia!"

Sowifakten (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose In dem Fall brauchen wir eine Freigabe per Email direkt durch Herrn Günther. Siehe COM:OTRS/de. De728631 (talk) 18:02, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done by @Krd.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Kim Frank - 2018.jpg[edit]

I sent the form regarding this photo being a self Portrait. But it still got deleted some weeks later. Please undelete. Thank you.

Mikknarf (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 173 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:First 8K Video from Space - Ultra HD.webm[edit]

The reason that was given was that it was a duplicate file but I don't found any file like it.--√Tæ√ 13:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose @: File:First 8K Video from Space - Ultra HD VP9.webm - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:16, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Alexis Jazz: Agree with you but the file was firstly uploaded by me so my file should be kept and this file should be delete.--√Tæ√ 13:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
@: but your file was VP8 I assume? Was the quality of your file better? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Logo_CCR.jpg[edit]

Nova logo do Grupo CCR A deleção foi feita erroneamente pois precisamos trocar a logo que se encontra nessa página [pt.wikipedia.org] Agradecemos antecipadamente. Junior Heads Propaganda MKTCCR (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC) --MKTCCR (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

New CCR Group logo The deletion was made wrong because we need to change the logo that is on this page [pt.wikipedia.org] Thanks in advance. Junior Heads Advertisement
 translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Eu me oponho à restauração deste logotipo porque a página de descrição do arquivo cita uma fonte externa e não tem licença e nenhuma permissão, e o logotipo não está sob TOO no país de origem. Por favor, peça ao designer de logo original que envie permissão via OTRS/pt com uma cópia carbono para você.
I oppose restoration of this logo because the file description page cites an external source and has no license and no permission, and the logo is not under TOO in the country of origin. Please have the original logo designer send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Green places Community Clubhouse.jpg[edit]

I am the copyright owner but my file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter.

I wish to release my works under a specific free license.

attach the my link [www.chain10.com]

Not just this work,

Please tell me how should I do it.

thank you so much!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chain10 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Chain10: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chain10. Please have the original photographer send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File: Kalantar1926.jpg[edit]

This photo is of 1926, the author is unknown but this photo is published in A.Kalantar, From Stone Age to Middle Ages, Yerevan, 2007 (in Armenian); Ashkharbek Kalantar, Armenia: From the Stone Age to the Middle Ages, Civilisations du Proche Orient, Se´rie 1, Vol. 2, Recherches et Publications, Neuchâtel, Paris, 1994; ISBN 978-2-940032-01-3

So, please restore this photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kashin (talk • contribs) 07:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Kashin: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I oppose restoration of this image because it appears to be a recreation of a copyright violation due to lack of evidence of permission from the copyright holder, and it appears not to be old enough for {{PD-anon-1923}}. Please have the original photographer or heir send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you, or wait until 1 January 2021.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Files of WIKIBASIA[edit]

I do not understand why this photo has been removed. I am its author and I agree to use it according to Wikicommons principles --WIKIBASIA (talk) 10:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)WIKIBASIA

Do you mean File:NOVI SINGERS IN WHITE PORTRAIT 2 (1977) fot. Barbara Szeremeta.jpg? -- Asclepias (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
@Polimerek: Are these files covered by Ticket:2018102910006334?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File: Gawriil_H._Oroschakoff,_1886.jpg[edit]

File: Gawriil_H._Oroschakoff,_1886.jpg

The portraied, Gawriil H. Oroschakoff, was minister of justice in Bulgaria in 1886. The painting was executed that same year, its physical owner is Haralampi G. Oroschakoff, Berlin, the greatgrandson of the portraied. It was never published. The painting's author is unknown. As the painting was made 132 years ago by an unknown author, the work is in the public domain with the permission PD-old-assumed applying. Sictransit (talk) 11:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

If it was never published, why does it look like a scan from a book? Thuresson (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Eurohelp[edit]

Eurohelp Don´t find any coherent reason for deletion. Logo was created by and belongs to Eurohelp Consulting S.L.U. There isn't any rights violations. --Eurohelp (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Published earlier without a free license here. Thuresson (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
That shouldn't be a problem because the logo is really simple and would qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}. However, it was essentially deleted as spam, so this issue should be addressed here. Is the company within our project scope? De728631 (talk) 14:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

De728631 Thuresson I can`t understand the logical behind wikirules / wikicommonsrules. If the image shouldn't be a problem because the logo is really simple and would qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}, why undeletion request can't solve in a positive way? Why user who have authorization to "control and solve" that kind of little problems do not really help and always punish? For Eurohelp, Author or the logo, there is a real interest into share the logo, make it public and get an association image-name, can't be any doubts about authorship or origin (www.eurphelp.es)

Any way re-upload the image in the correct way, (Published earlier without a free license) is motive of punishment too. I understood deletion (I made a mistake uploading the file) but Don´t find any coherent reason for have not undeletion positive answer, taking account the type of image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurohelp (talk • contribs) 09:47, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Three files by Maurice Chabas (1862-1947)[edit]

These would now be public domain in the country of origin of France since w:Maurice Chabas died in 1947. Abzeronow (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

OK, just undelete the two. Neither the DR nor "all public logs" search for File:Maurice Chabas.jpg gives any additional helpful information so that can stay deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Bryan Kibble. Image courtesy NPL. © NPL Management Ltd.jpg[edit]

I e-mailed the National Physical Laboratory at 00:23 on 9 July 2018 that I had created the webpage for Bryan Kibble and asked them if I could have an image of him to use, and an image of his invention. An image of Dr.Kibble was e-mailed to me later that day at 16:19 on 9 July 2018 from John Cherry at the NPL with permission for usage on Wikipedia, hence the 'Image courtesy NPL'.Dm4244 (talk) 17:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Dm4244: I oppose restoration of this image because it appears to be a copyright violation due to lack of evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Please have the original photographer send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Drs. Bryan Kibble (r) and Ian Robinson (l) working together on the improved Kibble balance. Image courtesy NPL. © NPL Management Ltd.jpg[edit]

I e-mailed the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) at 00:23 on 9 July 2018 that I had created the webpage for Bryan Kibble and asked them if I could have permission to use an image of him to use on Wikipedia, and an image of his invention. I received an image to use of Dr.Kibble later that day from John Cherry at the NPL, but he said that I would have to wait until he got permission for my usage of a picture of his invention as there was another person in the image in addition to Dr.Kibble, namely his collaborator Dr.Ian Robertson, who was on leave. On at 09:49 on 18 July 2018, with permission granted, I received an e-mail from John Cherry once more with the aforementioned image attached. Both images had 'Image courtesy NPL' under them. Dm4244 (talk) 17:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Permission for use at Wikipedia is insufficient. All uploads at Commons must be free for anyone to use anywhere without restrictions. Please have the copyright holder release this under a free licence and verify it via COM:OTRS. --De728631 (talk) 18:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by 恵比寿大好き[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I work for the company and we have the rights for these images and wish to upload them to Wikipedia. They are also accessible online. Feel free to email me at [email protected] and if I need to create a specific company Wikipedia account, I will do so. Thanks! 恵比寿大好き (talk) 18:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

File:شاهزاده اکبر میرزا.jpg[edit]

File:شاهزاده اکبر میرزا.jpg {{PD-IRAN}}

--Emtiov (talk) 03:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

 Comment Didn't have a date according to logs. Abzeronow (talk) 03:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Faruk Malami Yabo[edit]

Hello, I write to appeal for the page titled "Faruk Malami Yabo" deletion. I wrote an email using [email protected] with Ticket#2018110310004141 but no respond. As requested, the Facebook post that is considered as plagiarism is deleted. Moreover, i used the domain tbcn.com.ng to prove I am the source of the article on the website. Please, unload the article.

Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bashirmsaad (talk • contribs) 05:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 173 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by SønnavLeif[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ref.2018091310009168 I was a novice, I am still a novice,. I get a little bit of help now, from my dauther, but it is still difficult too be Perfect. I make my mistakes - it was a slip of the pen. These files are very good paintings from an anknown painter I will use some of these paintings instead of those i have used. SønnavLeif SønnavLeif (talk) 06:42, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

  • @SønnavLeif: Thanks for contributing. Are you sure that these paintings are in public domain? How long ago were they painted? What country? ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 07:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Public in generally do not like art, they will buy a copy in the shop of IKEA. But som people see the art in the painting. He was a norwegian artist, Leif Børresen. The first painting is at masterpeace, he said that. No2 Stilleben with kitchenware from old days. no3 is a Croquis made very fast, like they french artist from 1880. no 4 was his painting from 1939, the Danish schol of art gave him, as a foreinger - entree'. But Leif Børresen travelled around i europe in 1938, his goal was to fight agaist Franco in Spain. But sorry, he got Tuberkulose. Thous other paintings are fra 1940 too 1949 --SønnavLeif (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

 Info Other uploads from OP have approved OTRS, eg. File:Min have.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

File:1001 jobs for modern women - Key to success book.jpg[edit]

File was made at library. It is photographical work. Not add book cover with trade mark. I will add more description if needed. Maria Steve 72 (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2018 (UTC).

  •  Oppose Please see Commons:Derivative works. Even if you took this photograph, the book cover shown there is too prominently displayed, so we can't keep the image without permission from the copyright holder of the cover image. De728631 (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Ip Chun with Felix Leong.jpg[edit]

Release has been emailed by 3 individuals including photographer and 2 people from The LATIN AUSTRALIAN TIMES in which the photo was published, Ticket#2018111210002215 Australianblackbelt (talk) 06:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 173 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.

If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. De728631 (talk) 17:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Note that there is also a discussion on the file talk page. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:2018年台风玛利亚登陆前连江一户人家凉台花盆舞蹈.webm and so on[edit]

I request to undelete these files:

My reason: These files are uploaded to Commons first, so, I think, I do not need to do any claiming of copyright attribution. If these files can be found in other websites, they must be later then Commons.

Think about it. Other websites use files of Commons, then Commons delete its own files. It is ridiculous. - I am Davidzdh. 06:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

One year ago, a reply to Ticket#2017071410005022 has also pointed this out: If a photo is not appeared in other websites, you are no need to send the e-amil to OTRS. (It is also ironic that the photo mentioned in Ticket#2017071410005022 was requested to be deleted one year later because it has not been confirmed by OTRS volunteers.)- I am Davidzdh. 07:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

{{support}} nominated by B dash, deleted by Jcb → support. I know both these users for various careless edits and actions. If there are FoP cases they should be dealt with in a DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:24, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Go away with your clueless personal attacks! Jcb (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Factual observations are not personal attacks. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose - not own work by uploader, no permission from authors - Jcb (talk) 07:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@Davidzdh: is this true? Are you not the author? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz:Thank you for your attention. Please see my latest reply.- I am Davidzdh. 10:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@4nn1l2: at least File:福州三中罗源校区走廊 01.jpg from the list was uploaded by Cyclohexane233. You converted a "no permission" from B dash to this DR. Any comment? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz:, please see Special:diff/328083588. I checked half of the listed files (mostly those uploaded by User:Cyclohexane233). None of them can be restored without OTRS approval. Their source is WeChat or QQ. Some of them have been claimed to be own-work, but that claim is obviously questionable. I will check the other half later. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@4nn1l2: thanks for this information. I have a question though: according to Davidzdh, some authors did send permission to OTRS, but were declined for using a free mail address. These are not professional photographers, so they can't be expected to have paid mail addresses. Does that mean it's now impossible to release the rights for these photos, even by the authors? That can't be how this was meant to work. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
This depends on the circumstances. I have accepted many permissions from free mail addresses in the past 10 years. Permission from a free mail address is not a problem per se, sometimes the statement is credible anyway and sometimes we can verify a free address to belong to the author. Jcb (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: I checked every single file listed above. At the moment, I can only  Support undeletion of File:华南优教研究所大门远摄.jpg, File:华南优教研究所大门及牌匾.jpg, File:华南优教研究所内.jpg, File:华南优教研究所大门.jpg, and File:高盖山公园大门.jpg per Ticket:2017043010001331 which has been processed by User:Taiwania Justo and partially by User:Wong128hk. I can confirm that the customer had been told that OTRS ticket was not required for their submitted files. This has also been reflected on the file history page with edit summaries written by User:Taiwania Justo (example).
Regrading your question, as I had already told you, OTRS agents do accept permission statements sent from free email addresses.
Each case should be evaluated separately, and there is no hard and fast rule. I may accept a permission statement which another OTRS agent does not accept. Such things are common at OTRS. I am not sure why these people send their works to User:Davidzdh and User:Cyclohexane233 rather than uploading them themselves, but if it has anything to do with Great Firewall, I would be happy to help them upload their works to Wikimedia Commons, as a user who himself suffered and suffers from Internet blockage. Maybe they can send their files to photosubmissionwikimedia.org which is a different queue from permissions queue, or maybe we can arrange a custom license template similar to {{George Bergman permission}} for this special situation. However, these issues should be discussed and resolved at COM:OTRSN. Feel free to ping me there. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
@4nn1l2: I know, but the messages from Davidzdh would seem to suggest the authors were turned down for using a free mail address. It's a special case and I hope a solution can be worked out. I doubt they can (or even: should) send anything to a wikimedia.org address. Even if the firewall doesn't stop all communication: what if they take a photo of something the president doesn't like? This would result in passive censorship as they would hold back photos that may get them into trouble. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:00, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Let me explain in detail. These files were taken or recorded by who were able to do and sent to me. I went to their consent, filled in the author's name as they wished, and released it at Commons using designated copyright agreements.

Previously, after uploading the file, I would also ask them to send emails to OTRS. After I got the reply to Ticket#2017071410005022, I safely omitted the step to seek confirmation from OTRS volunteers. Because no website publishes these files before Commons.

In the summer of this year, these files were deleted (including the files which had sent emails to OTRS). I was told that I am not them (of course I am not them, I have already filled in the authors' names) and asked the real authors to send emails to OTRS. So I asked the authors to send emails. Some people (such as Ticket#2018081310006494) received replies from OTRS saying that "it was impossible to prove that the person who sent the email was able to represent the websites that originally posted the content". This is strange because the site that originally published these files is Commons. I think maybe OTRS volunteers think that these files were first published on other websites, and they want to declare copyright ownership on other websites. Other sites use Commons' files, but Commons wants to delete them, asks authors to request other websites that use Commons files post their names and copyright agreements, and then treat other sites as the sources of these files. This is not reasonable.

These files were not released on other websites first, then with the author's permission, the authors' names were clearly filled out and the specified copyright agreements were used. They had already satisfied the copyright regulations.

Many of these files have been used by the Mingdong Wikinews. This mass deletion has seriously damaged the confidence of the Mindong Wikinews volunteers. The enthusiasm of volunteers to post photos and videos on the news scenes is far less than before.

Please end this boring game of "deleting" as soon as possible.

P. S.: Some of the files were uploaded by Cyclohexane233. Since their problems are the same as the files I uploaded, they are presented together here. - I am Davidzdh. 10:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Skipping the OTRS process was not 'safely', it was a mistake. As you can read at Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS?, you should contact OTRS in cases where this applies: "I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons.". If the permission is valid, this case can be resolved by going to OTRS. Jcb (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms.jpg.jpg[edit]

This image is located in the principal entrance of the University and was painted a long time ago, I take a picture and modificate y delete the background and others imperfections. I paint again the bad parts. This is Universities logo, is not unlegal here. This image I take a picture

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nahim Peregrine (talk • contribs) 12:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Without further details about the original designer we cannot undelete this image. This version of the arms would have to have been published before 1 January 1951 to be in the public domain in the Ukraine (apparently not a problem here), but also the creator would have to have died before this date. That said, there is also the question of its copyright status in the United States. De728631 (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Rudolf Kaiser foto.jpg[edit]

Fotografie Rudolfa Kaisera českého loutkáře

Rudolf Kaiser byl můj děd, zasloužil se o položení základů československého loutkářství, z tohoto důvodu se domnívám, že si zaslouží, aby jeho osobnost a jeho památka byla zachována i dalším generacím. Hrál se svým divadlem po celou dobu mezinárodní výstavy 1929 v Praze na výstavišti. Během této výstavy byla ustanovena mezinárodní loutkářská organizace UNIMA. Zastupoval profesionální lidové loutkáře. Byl im meroriam vyznamenám za československé loutkářství a přece dodnes sedí v české republice v čele loutkoherecké sekce divadelní fakulty, žena činná v komunistickém režimu a která dosud nehodlá uznat zásluhy Rudolfa Kaisera a jeho rodiny. Také dle našeho názoru není objektivní k zásluhám Prof.Dr. Jindřicha Veselého a Prof. Josefa Skupy. Prostě ještě v naší zemi na některých místech existují totalitní struktury. Nikde stránkách divadelních portálů jsme fotografie našeho dědy ani následovníků nenašli. Z tohoto důvodu dáváme k dispozici soukromou fotografii Rudolfa Kaisera. Zároveň tuto fotografii použijeme v článku, který bude napsán v blogu na portálu idnes.cz --ArtKaiser (talk) 18:06, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

@Podzemnik: can you please check this request? De728631 (talk) 18:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 Comment - uploader blocked for a week for repeated reuploading of this file after warning - Jcb (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Files uploaded by TheRichic[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: License: Template:PD-SpanishGov TheRichic (talk) 10:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose PD-Spanish-Gov is only applicable for "laws, resolutions" and other texts, but not for photographs. De728631 (talk) 14:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
    • True, but there is no template that includes the Law 37/2007, of November 16, on reuse of public sector information, that allows to use all the 'documents' of the Spanish Public Administration and says in the annex that, for the purposes of this law, the word 'document' means: «All information or part of it, whatever its support or form of expression, is this textual, graphic, visual or audiovisual sound, including the associated metadata and the data contained with the highest levels of precision and disaggregation. For these purposes, computer programs that are protected by the specific legislation applicable to them will not be considered documents.» So this template is the closest one. TheRichic (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Uploads by Accipite7[edit]

File:USSR_territorial_claims_to_Turkey_1945-1953.png[edit]

Прошу сообщить по какой причине был удалён этот файл?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Accipite7 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Historical_regions_of_Georgia.png[edit]

Прошу сообщить по какой причине был удалён этот файл?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Accipite7 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Accipite7. These files were deleted because there were doubts about your authorship, i.e. other editors did not believe you made these maps yourself. De728631 (talk) 14:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Surya Bonaly.jpg[edit]

I do not understand the logic behind deleting this photograph. The source and the author was clearly indicated. It is clear from the author's photo stream that the photographs do indeed belong to him and he has agreed to change the license to one acceptable to the Commons. Are we now deleting photographs given to us by authors for being reproduced on random blogs? Pinging Túrelio. Surtsicna (talk) 08:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

  • {{O}} @Surtsicna: [fan-patinage.skyrock.com] was "Posted on Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 10:33 AM". Three years later, [www.flickr.com] was "Taken on October 30, 2010" with an "HP Scanjet G3010" that is not a camera. I think John Mathew Smith is flickrwashing. Please have the original photographer send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:39, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
    • @Jeff G.: This photograph is also available here, on Smith's website. He says he took the photograph on 6 April 2000 and that it was taken from his website to fan-patinage. Surtsicna (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
      • @Surtsicna: I see. It seems that photo [www.celebrity-photos.com] on galleryf was edited using Photoshop 2003:05:09 19:05:42 and that Smith has been lax in publicly documenting when he took his photos with 35mm film, instead letting Flickr assume that EXIF metadata from his scans with his Scanjet G3010 are definitive. I now  Support restoration of this upload and a move of the 2nd upload mentioned below to a different filename.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

I may have just made a mistake by uploading another photograph under the name of the old one. Surtsicna (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Surtsicna: You are correct in calling that a mistake.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate the bluntness :D Surtsicna (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Eurohelp Consulting S.L.U.jpg,[edit]

File:Eurohelp Consulting S.L.U.jpg, Can´t understand why a logo, made by Eurohelp to public use and identification of Eurohelp in all stages (physical and online) have been deleted. Can't be any doubts about existence or authorship, www.eurohelp.es. [www.google.com] --Eurohelp (talk) 08:41, 19 November 2018 (UTC) --Eurohelp (talk) 08:47, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Eurohelp:, because you are advertising here. Lotje (talk) 08:53, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:King Power Group กลุ่มบริษัท คิง เพาเวอร์ Photographed by Trisorn Triboon 03.jpg[edit]

File:King Power Group กลุ่มบริษัท คิง เพาเวอร์ Photographed by Trisorn Triboon 03.jpg I am photographed the images by myself and i owned the copyrights of the images i uploaded in commons please recover those file back and letting me know .. Thank you perhaps in future please kindly ask and wait for response from contributor, User , Editor first.. thank youTris T7 09:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tris T7 (talk • contribs)
  •  Oppose @Tris T7: That file depicts the work of one or more Disney employees. Please read DW and have them send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Encomio Solenne.pdf[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: mistake in deletion MarcoMichele2018 (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

 Comment. You shouldn't recreate deleted files out of process. Why is this Italian WWII document free of copyright? You need to tell us. Don't license historical documents cc-by-sa 4.0 unless you get them from a reputable source that licenses them that way. This document is not your "own work" (own work means you created the document). Relevant DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MarcoMichele2018 Abzeronow (talk) 12:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Igor Shulepov 01.jpg[edit]

File:Igor Shulepov 01.jpg Hello. We ask you to restore the photo. The rights to this photo belong to the ASC volleyball club. I am an employee of this club (press attache). And this photo is the head coach of our team - [www.nn-volley.ru] --Gollumer (talk) 11:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Gollumer: Please post permission on that page or have the photographer send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Daniel Rene.jpg[edit]

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2018053110008151 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:00, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
@Thuresson: Thanks, I have asked for additional info.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg[edit]

There is no copyright infringement done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberts Jack (talk • contribs) 23:07, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Roberts Jack: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted. Too many of the uploader's deleted files to guess.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:costasparliament.png[edit]

The image has been used by CBC, the publically funded broadcaster in Canada. See [www.cbc.ca]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Roberts Jack (talk • contribs) 23:14, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright belongs to CBC, no matter the funding. If they don't release under a compatible license, no return is foreseeable. --küñall (nütramyen) 23:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose no indication CBC released it under a license that is acceptable for Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 02:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A into Virtual Reality.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I used a NASA phone to have my colleague (NASA funded) take this photo of me during NASA funded work. It is public domain, and it's me. Please restore. A wiki person said it was probably deleted b/c the source I used was from an article I wrote on the CAPJournal web site. But that was just to show the official credit (NASA) in an official publication. Thank you. WikiXray75 (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @WikiXray75: I oppose restoration of this image because it appears to be a copyright violation due to lack of evidence of permission from the copyright holder, and it has been published on the Internet with a license we do not accept. Please have the original photographer (your colleague) send permission via OTRS with a carbon copy to you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Anarosmanli-4.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hello. Image (anarosmanli-4.jpg) that deleted from that page is not copyright, please restore it. He is our employee and we use same image both in www.adu.edu.az and wikipedia page MelumatlarADU (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Note that most uploads by this user are copyright violations. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Portrait NB de Jacques (Jack) Koch.jpg[edit]

I for now own an authorisation of the photograph to use the related picture.

I join hereby the document.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Glandor (talk • contribs) 08:11, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Le document ci-contre est un contrat par lequel un photographe accorde des droits d'exploitation à la société Jack Koch illustrations. En conséquence, deux clarifications sont nécessaires.
Premièrement ce contrat est un contrat d'exploitation. Il accorde des droits d'exploitation à la société Jack Koch illustrations pour ses fins. Mais il n'est pas évident que ces droits d'exploitation accordés incluent le droit pour cette société d'offrir les photographies sous licences libres pour utilisation inconditionnelle par toute personne du public en général pour ses propres fins. Il serait utile que vous développiez votre analyse en indiquant très précisément le passage du texte du contrat sur lequel pourrait se fonder une telle offre de licences libres.
Deuxièmement, puisque ce contrat accorde des droits spécifiquement à la société Jack Koch illustrations, et non à l'utilisateur Glandor de Wikimedia Commons, il faudrait donc que ce soit la société Jack Koch illustrations qui offre la licence, par exemple par l'envoi à Wikimedia d'une déclaration de licence par une personne qui représente cette société. Alternativement, il faudrait clarifier si vous représentez la société Jack Koch illustrations et à quel titre. Êtes-vous officiellement le fondé de pouvoir de la société par actions Jack Koch illustrations, c'est-à-dire que cette société vous a délégué le pouvoir de la représenter et de la lier par vos déclarations ? Il n'est pas nécessaire de dévoiler publiquement votre identité sur la présente page, mais, si vous représentez en effet cette société, alors il faudra que cette société fasse parvenir à Wikimedia, au moins par courriel (voir OTRS), une confirmation explicite du fait que vous représentez légalement cette société. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Operisan od ljubavi.jpg[edit]

This photo is the official cover for single "Operisan od ljubavi".

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LoreanLor (talk • contribs) 11:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @LoreanLor: Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I oppose restoration of this image because it appears to be a copyright violation due to it being a music recording cover. Please have the image designer, photographer, or music recording publisher (who generally holds copyrights to a music recording cover) send permission via OTRS with a copy to you. Have you uploaded anything that you actually created in full, as opposed to DW?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff, "Der europäische Altar (Wind of Change). Feuchte Träume. Perverse Schwärmerei.".jpg[edit]

Hello Team, could you please restore all these images, permission with CC-BY-SA-4.0 is given at the website of the artist - [www.matthiaslaurenzgraeff.com] Thank you very much in advance!

Greetings --Donald1972 (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

@Yann: DR for the first file: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matthias Laurenz Gräff, "Der europäische Altar (Wind of Change). Feuchte Träume. Perverse Schwärmerei.".jpg Abzeronow (talk) 17:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "[commons.wikimedia.org]" Hidden category:

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

    Views

    More

      Navigate

      Participate

      Print/export

      Tools

      In Wikipedia

        Add links