This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests - Wikimedia Commons

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Undeletion requestsRevision as of 09:57, 21 August 2018 by Yann (talk | contribs) (→‎Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima: closing request as done) (diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Jump to navigation Jump to search

Current requests

Shortcut: COM:UDR · COM:UDELC · COM:UNDELC

Request undeletion

  Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:

This is a dashboard widget. This is the template page where entries are added. Jump back to Commons:Undeletion requests for information and instructions. See also: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive. Closed requests will be archived after 8 hours. Currently 40 requests (5 waiting for archival).

Contents

File:MDP 91.jpg

This file has been downloaded according to instructions and cleared for use.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Answ3rback227 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

 Info Slightly larger version of File:M. Del Priore.jpg, up for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:M. Del Priore.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:56, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

@Thuresson: Please see User talk:Answ3rback227#Please don't delete: M. Del Priore.jpeg, which alleges that portrait artist, photographer, and uploader are all the same person.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:12, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
 On hold Ankry (talk) 13:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: for how long?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:40, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
I will not restore it before a decision in above DR. If somebody thinks it should be rejected as duplicate, feel free to close. Ankry (talk) 20:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:OsmAnd

This one has to take the cake for the most frivolous deletion. Two users mention that none of the screenshots meet the threshold of originality and thus should be kept. How does User:Srittau decide to close?

Deleted: Only one image had a proper license tag, all others were "licensed" under a clearly invalid CC license.

Translation: I can't be arsed to change around a few licenses (which could literally be copy-pasted from the page that was kept), so instead I'm just going to throw everything out. This kind of disregard for fixing problems is pretty rampant here and quite disappointing considering it's readers who get affected and reduces the utility of the project. Opencooper (talk) 04:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

 Comment This is one of the most frivolous undeletion requests I have seen in a long time. If the uploader (or anyone else) can't be arsed to fix their own license in the 1.5 months this DR was open, it is clearly not the admin's task to do so, especially given our backlog and number of deletion requests and speedy deletions on any given day. But of course it is easy to demand of other people to sacrifice their own free time. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Weak excuse. Would have taken you as much time as you typed in this reply to copy-paste the license templates from the non-deleted file. If you're really so pressed for time you could even post a request in the village pump for assistance. It also shouldn't be an admin's task to delete perfectly fine files just because there's a backlog. Opencooper (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
The sad thing is, if you had just asked to restore these files and fix the template, I would probably have done it. But given your shitty attitude I am not inclined to do just the slightest bit of work for you. I wonder if any other admin will, just to be abused by you. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
the deletions will continue until the attitude improves. the civility burden is on the uploader. charming. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
@Opencooper: The remaining File:Osmand street routing.png is licensed:
{{GPLv3 only}}
{{ODbL OpenStreetMap}}
{{PD-textlogo}}
Do you want those licenses to apply to all restored files from this category?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
If the screenshots only contain simple geometric shapes, then yes (though logos can always be cut out, as has been done in the past). I can only go off of the linked discussion though as the files are all currently deleted and can't be viewed. Opencooper (talk) 02:52, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Alberto Julbe

'[T]he author was listed as "My fiancee" (who happens to be my wife right now). I posted them with my account because she doesn't have one, and according to Spanish law, anything we own is shared.' per these edits.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

 Support Don't think we should be requiring OTRS for uploads from spouses. U.S. law allows for a "duly authorized agent" (not well defined) being able to do almost anything copyright-wise (including file registrations I believe) for the actual copyright owner; a spouse would probably fall under that (unless the author complains of course). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:34, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 Support We can accept OTRS permissions from close relatives, why do not do it here? --Ruthven (msg) 16:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 Question @Ruthven, Clindberg: how do you suggest to mark it to avoid redeletion after nominating again by a user who notices that uploader is not the author? Ankry (talk) 12:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: When you undelete a file, you always add {{undeleted}} template in the talk page (and eventually the {{deleted}} template when the deletion is due to a DR)). It suffices for anyone to be able to check past deletion history. --Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ruthven: I doubt bots will check that. And checking whether it is uploader's work or not may be a bot job. Ankry (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Offtopic section
@Ankry: When you consider a UDR done or not done, please also close it with {{Udelh}} and {{Udelf}}.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I consider it done when the OTRS agent added the OTRS template or nominates for redeletion. I would prefer OTRS requests to bo closed by the nominator, but this is to be discussed elsewhere. Ankry (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Fair enough, I hope @Arthur Crbz understands that.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:09, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Not sure to understand why Jeff G. mentions me in this discussion. Undeletion requests have always been closed by the administrator handling the request. {{undeleted}} is used to keep track of the request and if permission is insufficient, OTRS agent can ask for speedy deletion.
OTRS agents can close these requests but you need to know that sometimes we need several days before adding the permission template on the file (asking to the uploader to provide permission from another person OR clarifying information for instance). So requests could remain open for days... Unless we create a new page dedicated to OTRS agents ? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Balajijagadesh

See Commons:Deletion requests/files from the Press Information Bureau, Government of India Files from PIB are free under {{GODL-India}} Perumalism (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

 Doing… --Majora (talk) 04:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Done: Only the first section is done Perumalism. The other section is  Not done as there wasn't enough source information to confirm Indian Government involvement. --Majora (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Perumalism: Renotify. First one didn't work. --Majora (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Recuperação do Arquivo File:Cidade de Coluna (MG)-2018.jpg

Português do Brasil: Vim pedir a recuperação do arquivo File:Cidade de Coluna (MG)-2018. Venho novamente falar que ele é de minha autoria. Além disso, ele é essencial para a visualização da página da Wikipédia em português Coluna (Minas Gerais). Eu acho que o arquivo foi eliminado por eu não preencher corretamente as informações sobre as licenças (não sou muito bom com isso). E peço que recuperem esse arquivo de minha autoria ou deixem eu carregar uma nova versão do arquivo.

Guerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)Guerreiro do ValeGuerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Portuguese of Brazil: I came to ask for the recovery of file File: Cidade de Coluna (MG) -2018. I come again to say that he is my own. In addition, it is essential to view the Wikipedia page in Portuguese Coluna (Minas Gerais). I think the file was deleted because I did not properly fill out the license information (I'm not very good with this). And I ask that you recover this file of mine or let me load a new version of the file.
 translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


The following is copied from my user talk page; I cannot properly answer because I have access to neither file.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Respondendo a sua pergunta da página de recuperação de arquivos, observe bem no vídeo: ele é antigo, e o formato da imagem é em 3×4, enquanto a minha foto está em formato 16×9. Não teria como eu tirar uma foto desse vídeo, senão ele ficaria em péssima qualidade. O arquivo não carrega metadados porque a foto foi tirada de outro celular. Guerreiro do Vale (talk) 13:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Answering your question from the file retrieval page, look closely at the video: it is old, and the image format is 3 × 4, while my photo is in 16 × 9 format. It would not be like taking a picture of this video, otherwise it would be in bad quality. The file does not load metadata because the photo was taken from another cell phone.
 translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Guerreiro do Vale: The image is reasonable resolution (1040×584) but contains no camera info so it may be hard to prove that it is indeed your image and not made by somebody else. You can try to prove that contacting COM:OTRS; however, if you fail, the image may not be stored in Wikimedia Commons due to COM:PCP (reasonable doubt about authorship). Please note, that you may upload a photo as {{own}} if you made the original photo yourself using your camera (and if you did, it is hard to explain why did you not upload the original photo, full-size with camera info in EXIF). If there is a reason not to publish the original photo, you can also provide it to OTRS, where it will be kept private. As we have many photos, that are claimed to be Own work why they are actually not, we must be extremely carefull axepting photos that atuthorship cannot be verified, even if the image cannot be find in the Internet using services like Google Images.  Weak oppose at the moment and suggest to contact OTRS or upload the original file. Ankry (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

File:HB-HOT 2018 crash at Piz Segnas, Switzerland.jpg

Should be undeleted as it is from a police report ("Kantonspolizei Graubünden" = cantonal police, canton of Graubünden, Switzerland) where {{PD-Switzerland-official}} and {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} applies, the later due to the purely documentary nature of the picture (police photograph of the accident scene). --46.253.188.175 09:18, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Even if so, also a US copyright tag is needed. And I cannot find anything aplicable. Ankry (talk) 13:27, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
E.g. {{PD-ineligible}} would be appropriate. --Fraknö (talk) 15:05, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Let's wait for the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:2018-08-05 Flims Flugzeugabsturz JU52 Bild1 w 1600 h 0.jpg which is related. De728631 (talk) 16:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 On hold Ankry (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Noam Chomsky - Prospects for Survival - 2017 - 1.jpg and File:Noam Chomsky - Prospects for Survival - 2017 - 3.jpg

The files were erroneously marked as copyright violations, when they actually aren't. (See the thread at User talk:Secondarywaltz#Re Chomsky photos for a detailed explanation). Σ (talk) 18:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

 Info unsure if the uploader's explanation is enough here to prove that the uploader and not UMass DML owns copyright to the photos. IMO, a more reliable information from an identifiable person via email to OTRS might be needed here to explain more precisely relations between the photographer/uploader and UMass DML. However, any other opinions are welcome. Ankry (talk) 12:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: Did you read the thread? Because all the objections you note were answered therein. Are there any specific points that you find to be insufficiently explanatory? Σ (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
@Σ: Yes, I did. Let's assume, that you are right. And lets assume that in few years, when you are no longer an active user, we (or WMF) receive fake copyright claim from somebody claiming that they have boght copyright for this image from UMass DML, and they wish take-down and fee from reusers. How can we reject such a claim basing on declaration from an anonymous user only? That is the reason, that I think we need some independent or verifiable confirmation of your (an anonymous user's) words, eg. that Umass DML is a company that loans cameras only and do not claim copyright to any images or that you have some real agreement with them. Note, that I do not object undeletion here, I only raise some doubts for consideretion. Fake copyright claims are real. Ankry (talk) 04:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
It sounds like you're asking Σ to out themselves.
Did you look at the UMass DML website? It's pretty obviously a university service, and not a company. This is a standard arangement at universities I'm familiar with and have attended - you borrow a camera, and have full rights to copyrights to any media producted. Legoktm (talk) 05:11, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
On what basis, the metadata? The DML website clearly explains their policy on lending equipment to university affiliates. The metadata of a photo is text that can be changed by anyone who has photo editing software. I could do it to any file on Commons. I could do it to yours. You could do it to mine. If a hypothetical copyright troll did somehow manage to buy the copyright to all pictures produced by the university, could they come up with a plausible claim of copyright consistent with the DML's loan policy? Maybe. But based on metadata? That would be pretty thin ice to walk on. Σ (talk) 06:32, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Photos of John James allegedly grabbed from campaign videos

I was not given an opportunity to repair link SecretName101 (talk) 23:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

So you have the opportunity to do provide the link here.
 Support if this is [1]. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Without seeing the image (or the broken link I had originally provided), I have no way of confirming the correct link. SecretName101 (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
But quite probably, yes. I beleive that was the source of at least one of the images I am requesting be undeleted.SecretName101 (talk) 20:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I was not given an opportunity to repair link, and will do so if undeletedSecretName101 (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Extracted from video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUGcSecretName101 (talk) 00:02, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

This link www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUfGc SecretName101 (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Extracted from video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzU SecretName101 (talk) 00:03, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

I cannot see any video under the link above. Ankry (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Meant this link www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgUqOSzUfGc SecretName101 (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose because the photos were not found in the videos by the deleting Administrator Ronhjones. Other content uploaded by this uploader may have similar issues. Hyperlink: [www.youtube.com] (cc-by-2.0 on YouTube). One photo in that promotional video is of James in US Army uniform, and may be by a US Army fellow service member on duty, but needs permission via OTRS if not. The video of James was probably shot by members of James' campaign or an outside videographer, and needs permission via OTRS, probably © 2018, JOHN JAMES FOR SENATE, INC. The same goes for the link Ankry provided, [www.youtube.com] (also cc-by-2.0 on YouTube).   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
You misunderstand. It is not that they were not found in the videos, rather, the videos were not found at the broken links I accidentally provided. Besides, the image of him on duty is not one that I uploaded, so that is utterly irelevent. The youtube account (evidently) is his campaign account, thus its licensing as CC-BY is a licensing by the campaign itself. SecretName101 (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment File:John James.png - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment It there are doubts concerning validity oc the videos' CC-license, I think it is worth to restore tha images, fix the broken links and start DR discussions about them. Ankry (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment It has been more than a week since my initial request. Still pending. Hope this is not being forgotten/overlooked.SecretName101 (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
    @SecretName101: We are waiting for other admins' opinion/decision if any doubt. Ankry (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima

I've been waiting for some time for @Yann: to open an undeletion request after the events in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima. But he didn't. I had forgotten about it, until Slowking4 reminded me.

Either we need to delete the laundered negatives again or undelete the original. (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png) The current state makes no sense. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

 Question @Alexis Jazz: This is unclear to me which exactly file you wish to be restored? Ankry (talk) 13:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: at least File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png and File:Iwo Jima Flag Raising - LoC copyright notice.pdf. And anything else that would depict w:File:WW2 Iwo Jima flag raising.jpg, I'm not sure how I could find the links. (I assume admins can search deleted files, so I'm not really the right person to ask for exact filenames) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Ping @Clindberg: who responded quite a bit to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Frankly, I'd want to see the contents of that 1945 Associated Press news annual before I'd be comfortable keeping the Rosenthal photos. If the photo is not in there, there may not be any other valid renewal. But that one had some potential for it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Clindberg: and perhaps File:Marked-ap-letter.jpg as well? Can that be temporarily undeleted anyway so I can see it? I'm curious what they claim. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support Reading the DR mentioned above, it seems most people agree that it is very unlikely that the copyright was renewed. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Offtopic section
@Alexis Jazz: This letter contains AP claim of copyright and information that the image may be ued in Wikipedia as Fair Use (but not copied elsewhere). Not worth undeletion, IMO. Ankry (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: I'm curious how they word it exactly. If I (and Clindberg and whoever else is interested) are not allowed to see it, well.. That'll make it harder for anyone to support undeletion. AP made a statement about their copyright, but we can't see it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I think, it may be published, eg. on the WMF wiki, but not on Commons. Email me, if you wish to receive it privately. Ankry (talk) 13:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Ankry: How? There is no mail user link on your page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I had reason to disable it temporarily on this wiki. @Alexis Jazz: try now. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Done: No objection. {{PD-US-not renewed}} according to previous discussion. --Yann (talk) 09:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Emblem_of_People’s_Militia.svg

该图片确实是中国民兵的标识之一,相应图片为[2][3],适用Template:PD-PRC-exempt。原始速删理由“This is not the Emblem of People’s Militia of China and is a copyrighted work. Source: [4]。”不成立。

The picture is one of the identities of Chinese militia. The actual use is as follows[5][6]. Apply to Template:PD-PRC-exempt. The original speedy deletion reason "This is not the Emblem of People’s Militia of China and is a copyrighted work. Source: [7]." is invalid.Jyxyl9 (talk) 03:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

File:The Dog.jpg

Mistaken speedy deletion. Yesterday I requested deletion of File:A Dog.jpg as a degraded version of what when was available as File:The Dog.jpg. The former has JPEG artefacts one of which is now highlighted as an image note. The latter is compressed milder. Soon I came offline, then a sock puppet tried to remove deletion templates and edit warred, and in the ensuing confusion another file (better quality, or probably the source) was deleted.

I tried to obtain satisfaction from Magog the Ogre but he rejected my request. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Or, alternatively, just upload the better-quality JPEG over A_Dog.jpg. I am too lazy to search for it in the browser cache, whereas you sysops can extract it quickly. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support I suggest restoring and merging the images. However, as the existing one is subject of a DR I also suggest to delay any action until the DR is closed to avoid larger mess. Ankry (talk) 05:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Detlef beim Videodreh zu Feeling Good Juni 2018.jpg

Hallo,

ich beantrage die Wiederherstellung des Bildes File:Detlef beim Videodreh zu Feeling Good Juni 2018.jpg, da ich dieses Bild selber aufgenommen habe. Ich bin eine sehr gute Freundin von Detlef Malinkewitz und bin bei allen Videodrehs dabei gewesen. Dieser Schnappschuss entstand im saarländischen Staatstheater während der Videoaufnamen. Ich kann gerne die Videos und Fotos, die ich bei den Videodrehs (auch für das zweite Video) gemacht habe, zusenden, wenn das hilft, zu beweisen, dass das meine Aufnahme ist.

--Ankici (talk) 08:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello,

I request the restoration of the image : File: Detlef during the video shoot to Feeling Good June 2018.jpg, since I have taken this picture myself.

I am a very good friend of Detlef Malinkewitz and have been in all the video shoots. This snapshot was taken in the Saarland State Theater during the video recording. I'd like to send the videos and photos I made during the video shoots (including the second video) if that helps prove that this is my shot.
 translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Dieses Foto ist eindeutig nicht in dem YouTube Video enthalten. Die Kameraperspektive und die erhöhte Bühne unterscheiden sich deutlich von dem Video. / According to Ankici, this is not a still from the YouTube video but a photo snapshot taken by her during the filming. I believe this since I can't find this particular image in the video. Note also the different camera perspectives and the enhanced stage in the photo as opposed to the video. De728631 (talk) 15:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Schaeffer in 2016 Profile.png Undelete

The file, Schaeffer in 2016 Profile.png, was flagged and submitted for deletion by user, Patrick Rogel. The reasons for deletion were based on the concern that the video was not a part of a non-free program and/or a part of copy written material. This photo is a part of a publicly broadcasted program and was created by this user, KingHering.

The user who flagged and submitted the file for deletion noted that the image needed to be linked to its original video in description to fit the under WikiCommons. The description was changed and the link was added.

The original issues with this photo have been resolved, and the necessary info has been added. --KingHering (talk) 22:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose I can't find any information about free license on the source page. Ankry (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I've already asked the user to change the license on YouTube. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The original file has been added with a Creative Commons Attribution license. [www.youtube.com]. This is the original file of File:Schaeffer in 2016 Profile.png. In the description of the file is the link. KingHering (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@KingHering: For verification purposes could you give us a rough estimate of the time when this image appears? The video is over four hours long and we would have to verify that the image exists on that video. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 01:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Participation Party.jpg

In some countries witch include Japan and South Korea, escheat copyright works became public domain. --Sharouser (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

If there is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is not implemented into our copyright templates, it should be discussed in COM:VPC before posting here. If it is already implemented, please point out appropriate template (or exact paragraph in the copyright law if you need help to find it; or court cases). The {{PD-textlogo}} rationale was rejected in the Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Pipenavis. Ankry (talk) 06:30, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:PD-South Korea contains escheat cases. (There are exceptional cases. Property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws upon the death of a copyright owner without heir or, in the case of a legal person or organization, upon its dissolution. )
Participation Party was merged into the Unified Progressive Party. After the dissolution of Unified Progressive Party by the Constitutional Court of Korea, All of property of UPP was transfered to South Korean government.
  • Political Parties Act of Korea, Article 48
    • The residual assets of a political party dissolved by a ruling for dissolution by the Constitutional Court, shall revert to the National Treasury.
  • In that case, copyrigts are become public domain by South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • South Korean copyright law Article 49(Expiry of Author's Property Rights)
  • Author's property rights shall expire in any of the following cases:
  • 1.Where, after the author's death without heir, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to provisions of the Civil Law and other laws
  • and
  • 2. Where, after the dissolution of a legal person or an organization who is the owner of author's property rights, author's property rights are to belong to the state according to the provisions of the Civil Law and others laws.
There is an exclusion in the local copyright law that is implemented into our copyright templates. {{PD-South Korea}} --Sharouser (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Approval opinion for the environmental impact report on Atush vocational skills training center project.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am not too sure about the nature of the image being speedy deleted, however from the look of it from the source link from archive.org, it appears that the link goes to an administrative document published by Chinese authority which should be PD. As such when content was prepared from the document, it should not have copyright concern that requires speedy deletion? C933103 (talk) 06:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Info This file was submitted with a Creative Commons CC-BY-SA license. Thuresson (talk) 11:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
According to online archive it seems like the user was submitting the image as "own work" and then applied a license, probably misunderstanding that he applied afterprocess procedure onto the image made him become the creator of the file. If it is just the misunderstanding then that could be corrected instead of having to delete the file itself.C933103 (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Files by User talk:יאיר צפורי Ticket#2018040610008646

The files below handled in Ticket:2018040610008646. The files contain photographs of Prof. Moshe Amirav is historical events around the world. We have permissions from Prof. Moshe Amirav himself. According to him all photographers are unknown bystanders. Also the ticket contain a letter from Israeli lawer - Ya’akov Manor, Law Offices & Notary which claims that according to the old Israeli law from 1911 which applies until 2008 (the photos taken before) section 21: ...the person who was owner of such negative at the time when such negative was made shall be deemed to be the author of the work,... . The copyright owner of these photos is Prof. Moshe Amirav. I am not a lawer and we hed big discussion about bystander selfies, so I'll appreciate community guidance.

-- Geagea (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Support A lawyer usually knows the law. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:27, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 Support I think there was no shadow of doubt in the first place. Thanks. יאיר צפורי (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose - the 'bystander selfie' proposal failed for an obvious reason: no legal base. The depicted person does not somehow become the copyright holder by claiming that the photographers are unknown, nor does copyright somehow disappear if the depicted person does not remember who the photographer was. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
A closer look to the picture also gives the impression that these are pictures from professional news photographers rather than random bystanders. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 Comment Concerning the legal base, there is no binding international law, so the matter of these pictures should rely on Israeli law, as explained by the lawyer, who is an Israeli expert in the field.
I spoke with Prof. Amirav. According to him, during his participation in the 2000 Camp David Summit, his son Iri Amirav accompanied him and apparently he was the one who took two pictures with Prof. Amirav's camera. Although Prof. Amirav was happy to give credit to his son, even the son does not remember what pictures he took.
Professor Amirav indeed have pictures taken at various events by professional press photographers, but certainly not the pictures that are here. יאיר צפורי (talk) 08:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

bonjour

je suis a la demande d un de vos administrateur JP ALESSI (qui est jp alessi et quel droit il a) JE suis le manager du site web officiel de EMANUEL PAUL autorisation officiel de Wilhemina Paul sa fille. le site est depose depuis l an 2000 et j estime savoir de quoi je parle . j ai passe des annees a recueillir et trouver des information liees a EMANUEL PAUL et ceci dans un but purement BENEVOLE le livre BLUES for MANNy PAUL est un livre dedie a EMANUEL PAUL et il n parle de sa vie de musicien et de sa complete bibliographye musicale et video. LE livre en est plus a vendre car RUPTURE DE STOCK et j en suis l'editeur. Alors a la personne qui a ecrit qui est ALESSI JP et quelle droit il a je reponds je connais EMANUEL PAUL depuis 1983 date de ma rencontre avec lui et je suis ctalogue dans le monde entier comme la reference mondiale au sujet d'Emanuel Paul. je ne comprends pas je demande que le site OFFICIEL d'emanuaul apparaisee sur WIKIPEDIA et vous refuser ? ? je demande que le livre OFFICIEL dedicace a EMANUEL PAUL soit affiche et vous refuser ? je ne demande ni droit ni taxe ni quoi que se soit je veux juste que les gens sachent qu il y a un site WEB OFFICIEL et c est HTTP://www.emanuelpaul.com

MERCI par avance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessi JP (talk • contribs) 11:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
@Alessi JP: Bonjour,
1. Merci d'indiquer les fichiers concernés. 2. Pour tous documents publiés auparavant ailleurs, une autorisation écrite formelle du détenteur des droits est nécessaire. Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour les instructions. 3. Merci d'utiliser les majuscules à bon escient, et de respecter l'orthographe, car votre message est difficilement lisible en l'état. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: as per my message above. Please send a permission via OTRS. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Malan Breton in 2018.jpg

Hi, This is Malan Breton, I sent a full copyright release to wikipedia after being alerted to the issue, I own the full usage and rights of this image, I am not clear after sending you proof of this, why it has been deleted but please reinstate the image, all copyrights were transferred to me for use.--MalanBreton2 (talk) 17:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 189 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply. Did you tag the file {{subst:OP}} as instructed at OTRS and COM:CONSENT?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Reuploaded as File:Malan Breton 2018.jpg. OTRS received and processing now. Closing since this version isn't needed anymore. --Majora (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:৭১ এর স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে প্রকাশিত দৈনিক আজাদী.jpg

please it's don't delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patiya Road (talk • contribs) 18:34, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Patiya Road: This appears to be a copyvio. Please have the copyright holder send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. @Patiya Road:, your local project may allow local uploads and may allow fair use. To find out please visit m:Non-free content and find the project. If you need assistance please let me know. --Majora (talk) 04:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:CarlBarksFinland.jpg

[commons.wikimedia.org]

Can't believe this mess.. Undelete this, I'll overwrite with a proper white balance correction and the abomination that is File:Carl Barks a Finnland 94.jpg, well, there is already a DR for it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:06, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

 Support File:CarlBarksFinland.jpg (now a redirect) was uploaded years before File:Carl Barks a Finnland 94.jpg, so the latter should have been deleted. De728631 (talk) 14:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed, the author uploaded a better scan of the (analog) photo: File:Carl Barks signing autographs in Finland in 1994.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Marco Enríquez-Ominami 2018.jpg

Don't exist copyright problems with this photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpeirano (talk • contribs) 23:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The same file is being used at Facebook without a free licence. So we need a permission by email from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for details. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:NOI the init-azubi.png

Mail bez. Berechtigung wurde bereits gesendet, trotzdem wurde gelöscht. --NOI-init.at (talk) 13:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Wenn eine Email an OTRS gesendet wurde, wird die Datei letztendlich wieder hergestellt. Die Bearbeitungszeit für die Adresse permissions-commons liegt derzeit leider bei 131 Tagen, also werden einige Bilder zwischendurch routinemäßig gelöscht, wenn sie noch nicht geprüft werden konnten. Die Berechtigungs-Emails werden ausschließlich von Freiwilligen bearbeitet, also hab bitte noch etwas Geduld. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:NOI the init-azubi Geburt .png

Mail bez. Berechtigung wurde bereits gesendet, trotzdem wurde gelöscht. --NOI-init.at (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Wenn eine Email an OTRS gesendet wurde, wird die Datei letztendlich wieder hergestellt. Die Bearbeitungszeit für die Adresse permissions-commons liegt derzeit leider bei 131 Tagen, also werden einige Bilder zwischendurch routinemäßig gelöscht, wenn sie noch nicht geprüft werden konnten. Die Berechtigungs-Emails werden ausschließlich von Freiwilligen bearbeitet, also hab bitte noch etwas Geduld. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Cierre de campaña 2017 - Marco Enríquez-Ominami.jpg

Is not the same photo. This link is an RT of a video, not a picture.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpeirano (talk • contribs) 14:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I cannot find this particular image in the video that was allegedly the source. It is obviously from the same event but the video does not contain a frame like this image. De728631 (talk) 14:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support My bad. This one is correct. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Poster Ultraman Orb The Chronicle.jpg

Muhd Ailman Aisy (talk) 15:05, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  •  Oppose @Muhd Ailman Aisy: I am sorry, but we do not have sufficient permission for this film poster. Please have production company Tsuburaya Productions send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:BP 2018 Headshot Wide.jpg

This photograph was taken by Erica Sherman at the Office of Brooklyn Borough President Eric L. Adams in Brooklyn, New York. We have the copyright on this photo and it should not be deleted. We produced this photo and are using it for Eric Adams' Wiki page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bkbpeugene (talk • contribs) 17:52, 20 August 2018‎ (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose @Bkbpeugene: Please have HUNTER COLLEGE NEW YORK CITY FOOD POLICY CENTER and Erica Sherman send permission via OTRS with a copy to you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:58, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Fresque des Lyonnais - Realisation.jpg

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung der Datei, da sie mir von CitéCréation eigens zur Übersetzung der französischen Wikipedia-Seite "La fresque des Lyonnais"ins Deutsche zugesandt wurde --MW62 (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose Hier benötigen wir eine Freigabe per Email direkt durch die Rechteinhaber (siehe COM:OTRS). Dabei müssen sowohl der Fotograf als auch die Malerin des Bildes ihre Zustimmung zu einer freien Lizenz erklären. De728631 (talk) 09:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Andrea Matheisen, ON EQUAL FOOTING, 2015 Bronze, h 44 cm.jpg

Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung, da mir die Datei von der Urheberin eigens für die Erstellung eines Wikipedia-Artikels zugesandt worden ist.--MW62 (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose In solchen Fällen benötigen wir eine Freigabe per Email direkt durch den Rechteinhaber (siehe COM:OTRS). Das ist allerdings meistens der Fotograf und nicht die abgebildete Person. De728631 (talk) 09:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Lavinia El Vals Roto.jpg

la foto aqui proporcionada tiene una licencia libre la cual fue agregada como se me sugería hiciera aparte se ha otorgado el permiso por parte del autor mismo (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Tu y Yo.jpg

se me han otorgado los permisos de está imagen pues es de mi propiedad por compra a la dibujante de el, le encargue la comisión hace 1 año está hecha especialmente para lo que es este articulo (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Flor Amargo.jpg

está foto fue agregada con licencia libre para tener la biografia complementada la misma Flor amargo a aceptado el que se use la foto sin lucros ni problemas [www.facebook.com]

(AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Flor Amargo Videoclip Carrusel.jpg

he subido este corte sin fin de lucros o problema en usarlo Flor Amargo como tal no tiene conflicto en que use fotos o contenido de ella ya que llegamos a un acuerdo en que se darán créditos a ella sobre sus fotos o contenidos ajenos a ella, incluidos mis trabajos que fueron usados por ella en 2016 (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Ju, Ju, Ju.jpg

todo contenido referente a Flor Amargo se me ha permitido usarlo del mismo modo que ella usa trabajos que fueron realizados por Arashi Matoi y un servidor en 2016 (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Espejo Cristal.jpg.

se me ha permitido sin problemas usar este contenido con total permiso a parte de meter una licencia libre que no perjudica a terceros

(AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

Lavinia ekaterina.jpg

está foto fue otorgada el permiso a usar totalmente, se le agrego la licencia libre no hay problemas en la utilización de dicha foto ya que el autor está mencionado y todo está en orden (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 00:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:Un Corazón + Nostalgia.jpg.

es una foto tomada por Lavinia Ekaterina personalmente me ha obsequiado fotos y todo referente a lo que hay en esta biografia (AnthonyOlivano (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC))

File:San Justo de las Dorigas Asturias.jpg

i have permission of author to use this photo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Fuente San Justo de las Dorigas.jpg

i have permission of the author to use this photo

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


I'm the author of this photo. The link suggested "bookin.com" is again my own photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
So are you the author or not? Yann (talk) 09:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:San Justo de las Dorigas Asturias.jpg

I'm the author of this photo. The link suggested "bookin.com" is again my own photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Viñalbero (talk • contribs) 06:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose In cases like this we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Unfortunately the image at Booking.com is not credited to any particular photographer, and we have no possibility to verify your claims through your Wikimedia account. Therefore the Booking.com staff would have to confirm that this photo comes with a free licence. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Girl and prince.jpg

It’s art made by me for the TV shows Wikipedia page.

I fixed the descriptions to include their names.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Treelearning (talk • contribs) 07:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 Oppose The original characters are copyrighted and non-free. Derivative works like this cannot be published without permission from the original copyright holders. De728631 (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Objective SAM 2019.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am a member of the organisation that created the logo. Therefore, I have been granted the right to upload it on the page. Please let me know when it is back on the page. Conor hollywood (talk) 07:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

 Oppose This has been published elsewhere online without a free licence. Therefore we require a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. If you are affiliated with the organisation that holds the rights for this logo, please send an email from your official account as outlined in COM:OTRS. However, the processing of such a mail by our volunteers will currently take up to three months. Alternatively you may release the logo under a free licence at the website of your organisation. This latter option would considerably speed up the undeletion process at Commons. De728631 (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "[commons.wikimedia.org]" Hidden category:

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

    Views

    More

      Navigate

      Participate

      Print/export

      Tools

      In Wikipedia

        Add links