This website does readability filtering of other pages. All styles, scripts, forms and ads are stripped. If you want your website excluded or have other feedback, use this form.

Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba, and the Counterrevolution

Shanthi Kalathil,  Taylor Boas
  • July 16, 2001
  • Paper
Summary:   Related Media and Tools

    Sign up for weekly updates from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

    If you enjoyed reading this, subscribe for more!

    Summary
    It is widely believed that the Internet poses an insurmountable threat to authoritarian rule. But political science scholarship has provided little support for this conventional wisdom, and a number of case studies from around the world show that authoritarian regimes are finding ways to control and counter the political impact of Internet use. While the long-term political impact of the Internet remains an open question, Kalathil and Boas argue that these strategies for control may continue to be viable in the short to medium term.

    Many authoritarian regimes translate a long and successful history of control over other information and communication technologies into strong control of Internet development within their borders. Potential challenges to the state may arise from Internet use in several areas: the mass public, civil society, the economy, and the international community. Authoritarian states will likely respond to these challenges with a variety of reactive measures: restricting Internet access, filtering content, monitoring on-line behavior, or even prohibiting Internet use entirely. In addition, such states seek to extend central control through proactive strategies, guiding the development of the medium to promote their own interests and priorities. Through a combination of reactive and proactive strategies, an authoritarian regime can counter the challenges posed by Internet use and even utilize the Internet to extend its reach and authority.

    In this paper the authors illustrate how two authoritarian regimes, China and Cuba, are maintaining control over the Internet's political impact through different combinations of reactive and proactive strategies. These cases illustrate that, contrary to assumptions, different types of authoritarian regimes may be able to control and profit from the Internet. Examining the experiences of these two countries may help to shed light on other authoritarian regimes' strategies for Internet development, as well as help to develop generalizable conclusions about the impact of the Internet on authoritarian rule.

    Click on link above for full text of this Carnegie Paper.

    End of document

    Related Topics

    Popular Articles

    Featured

    The World Unpacked

    The World Unpacked is a weekly foreign policy podcast, hosted by Jen Psaki, that breaks down the hottest global issues of today with experts, journalists, and policymakers who can explain what is happening, why it matters, and where we go from here.

    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

    1779 Massachusetts Avenue NW
    Washington, DC 20036-2103

    Phone: 202 483 7600
    Fax: 202 483 1840

    Contact By Email

    © 2019 All Rights Reserved

    Please note...

    You are leaving the website for the Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy and entering a website for another of Carnegie's global centers.

    请注意...

    你将离开清华—卡内基中心网站,进入卡内基其他全球中心的网站。